Examining the relationship between monocytes and monocyte-derived ratios in post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients and their impact on coronary artery disease progression.

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ilan Merdler, Kalyan R Chitturi, Abhishek Chaturvedi, Lior Lupu, Ryan Wallace, Matteo Cellamare, Cheng Zhang, Vaishnavi Sawant, Itsik Ben-Dor, Brian C Case, Ron Waksman
{"title":"Examining the relationship between monocytes and monocyte-derived ratios in post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients and their impact on coronary artery disease progression.","authors":"Ilan Merdler, Kalyan R Chitturi, Abhishek Chaturvedi, Lior Lupu, Ryan Wallace, Matteo Cellamare, Cheng Zhang, Vaishnavi Sawant, Itsik Ben-Dor, Brian C Case, Ron Waksman","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammation plays a key role in the progression and instability of coronary atherosclerosis. Monocytes and their ratios with eosinophils and lymphocytes serve as valuable markers for assessing inflammation. We explored blood monocyte levels and their related ratios in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) or significant de novo lesions (DNL).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A total of 3912 PCI procedures were identified from a single-center retrospective registry (2013-2022) and categorized into three groups: single PCI and no subsequent intervention (control group, n = 3342), significant ISR requiring repeat PCI (ISR-PCI group, n = 219), and significant de novo lesions requiring repeat PCI (DNL-PCI group, n = 351). Monocyte counts and monocyte-related ratios were evaluated at the index procedure and follow-up (clinical or repeat PCI procedures). Comorbidities were more prevalent in the ISR-PCI and DNL-PCI groups than those in the control group. In comparison to the control group, both ISR-PCI (15.6 ± 26.7 vs. 24.4 ± 37.8, P < 0.001) and DNL-PCI groups (16.2 ± 28.5 vs. 24.4 ± 37.8, P < 0.001) exhibited a significantly lower baseline monocyte-to-eosinophil ratio. In the adjusted regression models, a lower baseline monocyte-to-eosinophil ratio (P = 0.001) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.04) were associated with DNL, whereas no such association was observed in ISR-PCI cases (P = 0.4 for both ratios).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reinforce the role of inflammatory markers, such as monocytes and monocyte-related ratios, in identifying individuals at risk for the progression of coronary disease post-PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.01.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inflammation plays a key role in the progression and instability of coronary atherosclerosis. Monocytes and their ratios with eosinophils and lymphocytes serve as valuable markers for assessing inflammation. We explored blood monocyte levels and their related ratios in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) or significant de novo lesions (DNL).

Methods and results: A total of 3912 PCI procedures were identified from a single-center retrospective registry (2013-2022) and categorized into three groups: single PCI and no subsequent intervention (control group, n = 3342), significant ISR requiring repeat PCI (ISR-PCI group, n = 219), and significant de novo lesions requiring repeat PCI (DNL-PCI group, n = 351). Monocyte counts and monocyte-related ratios were evaluated at the index procedure and follow-up (clinical or repeat PCI procedures). Comorbidities were more prevalent in the ISR-PCI and DNL-PCI groups than those in the control group. In comparison to the control group, both ISR-PCI (15.6 ± 26.7 vs. 24.4 ± 37.8, P < 0.001) and DNL-PCI groups (16.2 ± 28.5 vs. 24.4 ± 37.8, P < 0.001) exhibited a significantly lower baseline monocyte-to-eosinophil ratio. In the adjusted regression models, a lower baseline monocyte-to-eosinophil ratio (P = 0.001) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.04) were associated with DNL, whereas no such association was observed in ISR-PCI cases (P = 0.4 for both ratios).

Conclusion: Our findings reinforce the role of inflammatory markers, such as monocytes and monocyte-related ratios, in identifying individuals at risk for the progression of coronary disease post-PCI.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信