Net worth poverty and child Well-being: Black–White differences

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Christina Gibson-Davis , Lisa A. Keister , Lisa A. Gennetian
{"title":"Net worth poverty and child Well-being: Black–White differences","authors":"Christina Gibson-Davis ,&nbsp;Lisa A. Keister ,&nbsp;Lisa A. Gennetian","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.108047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Net worth poverty, defined as having wealth (assets minus debts) that is less than one-fourth the federal poverty line, can have negative associations with children’s development. Net worth poverty can reflect the lack of assets or the presence of debts, with the former posing greater developmental risks than the latter. Structural inequalities and racial discrimination have led to higher rates of asset poverty for Black than White families, suggesting that net worth poverty may pose disproportionate risks for Black children. To inform this hypothesis, this study examines how net worth poverty and its subcomponents of asset and debt poverty relate to Black and White children’s academic and behavioral outcomes. Data come from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and its Child Development Study, which includes 3,164 Black and 3,578 White children aged 3–17 observed between 2002 and 2019. Regression models estimated the association between poverty (measured as net worth, income, assets, or debt) and four child outcomes: reading and math achievement and externalizing and internalizing behavior scores. In models that control for income poverty, among White children, net worth poverty, as well as asset and debt poverty, was associated with worse outcomes. Contrary to expectations, using the same set of covariates, net worth poverty among Black children was not a significant predictor of outcomes. For this racial group, asset poverty was negatively related to outcomes, but effects were roughly half the size as those found for White children. Additionally, debt poverty among Black children was not associated with either positive or negative effects. The small effect of asset poverty, when coupled with the lack of effects for debt poverty, mechanically explains why net poverty was not detrimental for Black children. This study underscores the importance of wealth deprivation in studies of poverty and shows that the negative effects of net worth poverty differ between White and Black children.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 108047"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924006194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Net worth poverty, defined as having wealth (assets minus debts) that is less than one-fourth the federal poverty line, can have negative associations with children’s development. Net worth poverty can reflect the lack of assets or the presence of debts, with the former posing greater developmental risks than the latter. Structural inequalities and racial discrimination have led to higher rates of asset poverty for Black than White families, suggesting that net worth poverty may pose disproportionate risks for Black children. To inform this hypothesis, this study examines how net worth poverty and its subcomponents of asset and debt poverty relate to Black and White children’s academic and behavioral outcomes. Data come from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and its Child Development Study, which includes 3,164 Black and 3,578 White children aged 3–17 observed between 2002 and 2019. Regression models estimated the association between poverty (measured as net worth, income, assets, or debt) and four child outcomes: reading and math achievement and externalizing and internalizing behavior scores. In models that control for income poverty, among White children, net worth poverty, as well as asset and debt poverty, was associated with worse outcomes. Contrary to expectations, using the same set of covariates, net worth poverty among Black children was not a significant predictor of outcomes. For this racial group, asset poverty was negatively related to outcomes, but effects were roughly half the size as those found for White children. Additionally, debt poverty among Black children was not associated with either positive or negative effects. The small effect of asset poverty, when coupled with the lack of effects for debt poverty, mechanically explains why net poverty was not detrimental for Black children. This study underscores the importance of wealth deprivation in studies of poverty and shows that the negative effects of net worth poverty differ between White and Black children.
净资产贫困与儿童幸福:黑人与白人的差异。
净值贫困的定义是财富(资产减去债务)低于联邦贫困线的四分之一,它可能与儿童的发展存在负面关联。净值贫困可以反映缺乏资产或存在债务,前者比后者带来更大的发展风险。结构性不平等和种族歧视导致黑人家庭的资产贫困率高于白人家庭,这表明净资产贫困可能给黑人儿童带来不成比例的风险。为了说明这一假设,本研究考察了净资产贫困及其资产和债务贫困的子组成部分与黑人和白人儿童的学业和行为结果的关系。数据来自收入动态小组研究及其儿童发展研究,该研究包括2002年至2019年期间观察的3164名3-17岁的黑人和3578名白人儿童。回归模型估计了贫困(以净值、收入、资产或债务衡量)与四项儿童成绩之间的关系:阅读和数学成绩、外化和内化行为得分。在控制收入贫困的模型中,在白人儿童中,净资产贫困以及资产和债务贫困与更糟糕的结果相关。与预期相反,使用同一组协变量,黑人儿童的净资产贫困并不是结果的显著预测因子。对于这个种族群体来说,资产贫困与结果呈负相关,但影响程度大约是白人儿童的一半。此外,黑人儿童的债务贫困与积极或消极影响无关。资产贫困的影响很小,再加上对债务贫困没有影响,这就机械地解释了为什么净贫困对黑人儿童不是有害的。这项研究强调了财富剥夺在贫困研究中的重要性,并表明净资产贫困的负面影响在白人和黑人儿童之间是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信