Are ICU Bedspaces Based in Evidence, and Do They Support Patient Sleep? A Narrative Review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Oystein Tronstad, Irene Szollosi, Dylan Flaws, Barbara Zangerl, John F Fraser
{"title":"Are ICU Bedspaces Based in Evidence, and Do They Support Patient Sleep? A Narrative Review.","authors":"Oystein Tronstad, Irene Szollosi, Dylan Flaws, Barbara Zangerl, John F Fraser","doi":"10.1177/19375867251317239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This narrative review summarizes some of the evidence guiding current intensive care unit (ICU) design, focussing on environmental factors impacting on sleep, and compares available evidence and recommendations to current ICU designs and builds. <b>Background:</b> The importance of sleep for recovery after illness is well known. However, hospitalized patients frequently experience poor and disrupted sleep. This is especially true for patients admitted to the ICU. There are many factors negatively impacting on ICU patients' ability to sleep. Some relate to their illness or pre-existing sleep problems; others relate to patient care activities. While the ICU bedspace may facilitate 24h care, there is growing awareness of the detrimental impact the bedspace environment (especially suboptimal lighting and excessive sound/noise) has on sleep quality, and important questions raised regarding how this may impact on recovery and health outcomes. Multiple guidelines and recommendations exist to guide ICU bedspace design. However, questions have been raised whether contemporary ICUs are evidence-based, and whether the available evidence is effectively translated into the built ICU. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive literature review was conducted, exploring the evidence supporting current ICU bedspace design and the impact of ICU design and environmental factors on patient sleep. <b>Results and conclusion:</b> This review summarizes the impact of the ICU bedspace environment on patient outcomes and describes features of the ICU bedspace design that may not adhere to best evidence and contribute to poor sleep. Suggestions on how ICU bedspaces can be improved to optimize sleep are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19375867251317239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251317239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This narrative review summarizes some of the evidence guiding current intensive care unit (ICU) design, focussing on environmental factors impacting on sleep, and compares available evidence and recommendations to current ICU designs and builds. Background: The importance of sleep for recovery after illness is well known. However, hospitalized patients frequently experience poor and disrupted sleep. This is especially true for patients admitted to the ICU. There are many factors negatively impacting on ICU patients' ability to sleep. Some relate to their illness or pre-existing sleep problems; others relate to patient care activities. While the ICU bedspace may facilitate 24h care, there is growing awareness of the detrimental impact the bedspace environment (especially suboptimal lighting and excessive sound/noise) has on sleep quality, and important questions raised regarding how this may impact on recovery and health outcomes. Multiple guidelines and recommendations exist to guide ICU bedspace design. However, questions have been raised whether contemporary ICUs are evidence-based, and whether the available evidence is effectively translated into the built ICU. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted, exploring the evidence supporting current ICU bedspace design and the impact of ICU design and environmental factors on patient sleep. Results and conclusion: This review summarizes the impact of the ICU bedspace environment on patient outcomes and describes features of the ICU bedspace design that may not adhere to best evidence and contribute to poor sleep. Suggestions on how ICU bedspaces can be improved to optimize sleep are provided.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
22.70%
发文量
82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信