Enhancing Data Quality in a Statewide Birth Defects Registry: Insights from an Ongoing Quality Improvement Initiative.

Q4 Medicine
Journal of registry management Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Rebecca Howell, Rachel Allred, Dayana Betancourt, Caitlyn Yantz, A J Agopian, Charles Shumate
{"title":"Enhancing Data Quality in a Statewide Birth Defects Registry: Insights from an Ongoing Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Rebecca Howell, Rachel Allred, Dayana Betancourt, Caitlyn Yantz, A J Agopian, Charles Shumate","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since 1999, the Texas Birth Defects Registry (TBDR) has conducted active statewide surveillance of congenital anomalies in Texas. The TBDR has established quality assurance procedures and protocols. With the aim of supplementing these existing procedures with a new approach to proactively identify operational issues impacting data quality, we sought to implement a survey to identify procedural and operational challenges and develop strategies to mitigate the effects of practices (eg, changes in reporting practices at hospitals), external events (eg, pandemics), and other issues that may impact data quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An open-text, anonymous survey was developed and distributed to TBDR staff. The survey elicited responses from staff related to TBDR operations, partnerships, and communication with external health care facilities. In years 2 and 3, the survey was abbreviated from 9 to 3 questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Completion rates were 45%, 74%, and 49% in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Thematic analysis across all 3 years identified 7 primary themes: (1) data timeliness, (2) data quality improvements, (3) workflow optimization, (4) fundamental training needs, (5) specialized or technical training needs, (6) system challenges, and (7) internal communication and coordination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project provides a proof-of-concept that active surveillance birth defects registries can collect information on data quality-related staff experiences in a real-time, systematic manner and implement short- and long-term strategies to address data quality. The survey results prompted internal strategic planning, additional employee training initiatives, and data system enhancements. Additional work is needed to monitor the long-term improvements resulting from these strategic actions. The data quality survey results and implemented strategies may be useful to other surveillance programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":39246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of registry management","volume":"51 3","pages":"109-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of registry management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since 1999, the Texas Birth Defects Registry (TBDR) has conducted active statewide surveillance of congenital anomalies in Texas. The TBDR has established quality assurance procedures and protocols. With the aim of supplementing these existing procedures with a new approach to proactively identify operational issues impacting data quality, we sought to implement a survey to identify procedural and operational challenges and develop strategies to mitigate the effects of practices (eg, changes in reporting practices at hospitals), external events (eg, pandemics), and other issues that may impact data quality.

Methods: An open-text, anonymous survey was developed and distributed to TBDR staff. The survey elicited responses from staff related to TBDR operations, partnerships, and communication with external health care facilities. In years 2 and 3, the survey was abbreviated from 9 to 3 questions.

Results: Completion rates were 45%, 74%, and 49% in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Thematic analysis across all 3 years identified 7 primary themes: (1) data timeliness, (2) data quality improvements, (3) workflow optimization, (4) fundamental training needs, (5) specialized or technical training needs, (6) system challenges, and (7) internal communication and coordination.

Conclusions: This project provides a proof-of-concept that active surveillance birth defects registries can collect information on data quality-related staff experiences in a real-time, systematic manner and implement short- and long-term strategies to address data quality. The survey results prompted internal strategic planning, additional employee training initiatives, and data system enhancements. Additional work is needed to monitor the long-term improvements resulting from these strategic actions. The data quality survey results and implemented strategies may be useful to other surveillance programs.

提高全州出生缺陷登记的数据质量:来自正在进行的质量改进倡议的见解。
背景:自1999年以来,德克萨斯州出生缺陷登记处(TBDR)对德克萨斯州的先天性异常进行了积极的全州监测。TBDR建立了质量保证程序和协议。为了用一种新方法来补充这些现有程序,以主动识别影响数据质量的业务问题,我们设法开展了一项调查,以确定程序和业务挑战,并制定战略,以减轻做法(例如,医院报告做法的变化)、外部事件(例如,流行病)以及可能影响数据质量的其他问题的影响。方法:开发了一份开放文本的匿名调查问卷,并分发给TBDR工作人员。调查得到了与TBDR业务、伙伴关系以及与外部卫生保健机构沟通有关的工作人员的答复。在第2年和第3年,调查问题从9个缩减到3个。结果:第1年、第2年和第3年的完成率分别为45%、74%和49%。三年来的专题分析确定了七个主要主题:(1)数据及时性,(2)数据质量改进,(3)工作流程优化,(4)基本培训需求,(5)专业或技术培训需求,(6)系统挑战,(7)内部沟通和协调。结论:该项目提供了一个概念验证,即主动监测出生缺陷登记可以实时、系统地收集与数据质量相关的工作人员经验信息,并实施短期和长期战略来解决数据质量问题。调查结果促进了内部战略规划、额外的员工培训计划和数据系统改进。需要进一步的工作来监测这些战略行动所产生的长期改善。数据质量调查结果和实施策略可能对其他监测项目有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of registry management
Journal of registry management Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信