Does high body mass index increase the risk of shoulder instability surgery? The LUXE prospective cohort study on 227 recurrent anterior shoulder instability

Q2 Medicine
Vincent Roy MD, MSc , Claire Bastard MD, MSc , Emilie Sandman MD, MSc, FRCSC , Alexis Rousseau-Saine MD, FRCSC , Marie-Lyne Nault MD, PhD, FRCSC , Dominique M. Rouleau MD, MSc, FRCSC
{"title":"Does high body mass index increase the risk of shoulder instability surgery? The LUXE prospective cohort study on 227 recurrent anterior shoulder instability","authors":"Vincent Roy MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Claire Bastard MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Emilie Sandman MD, MSc, FRCSC ,&nbsp;Alexis Rousseau-Saine MD, FRCSC ,&nbsp;Marie-Lyne Nault MD, PhD, FRCSC ,&nbsp;Dominique M. Rouleau MD, MSc, FRCSC","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The aim of this study was to determine whether body mass index (BMI) plays a role in overall morbidity following shoulder instability surgery and whether some surgical techniques are BMI-sensitive.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective, multicenter database was created that included the following three surgical techniques: arthroscopic Bankart (AB), arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage (ABR), and Open Latarjet (OL). Patient data (demographic, strength, laxity and functional outcomes (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [QuickDASH]; Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; and QuickDASH Pain subscore) were compared at enrollment and last postoperative follow-up. Functional outcomes, complications, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the different groups and then subdivided by BMI. Follow-up radiographs were evaluated for graft position and complications for all patients who underwent OL.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 227 patients (164 men, 63 women) were included with at least 1-year follow-up (3.3y AB (n = 126), 4.5y ABR (n = 34), and 3y OL (n = 62)). At baseline, patients with high BMI (37(17%)) had significantly worse QuickDASH Pain subscores (2.9 ± 1.0, <em>P</em> value &lt;.05) and QuickDASH (46.8 ± 21.6, <em>P</em> value &lt; .001) scores compared to all other BMI groups. All BMI groups had similar QuickDASH (<em>P</em> value .22) and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (<em>P</em> value .69) scores at last follow-up. Complication rates for patients with high BMI were significantly higher in ABR compared to AB (<em>P</em> value .042) and so were reoperation rates in patients with high BMI after OL compared to patients with high BMI after ABR (9.5%, <em>P</em> value .049).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with high BMI showed significantly worse baseline functional scores but no difference was found in postoperative functional scores between BMI groups. Complication rates were significantly higher in patients with high BMI following ABR compared to AB, and so were reoperation rates in patients with high BMI undergoing Latarjet compared to AB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 274-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663832400478X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to determine whether body mass index (BMI) plays a role in overall morbidity following shoulder instability surgery and whether some surgical techniques are BMI-sensitive.

Methods

A prospective, multicenter database was created that included the following three surgical techniques: arthroscopic Bankart (AB), arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage (ABR), and Open Latarjet (OL). Patient data (demographic, strength, laxity and functional outcomes (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [QuickDASH]; Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; and QuickDASH Pain subscore) were compared at enrollment and last postoperative follow-up. Functional outcomes, complications, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the different groups and then subdivided by BMI. Follow-up radiographs were evaluated for graft position and complications for all patients who underwent OL.

Results

A total of 227 patients (164 men, 63 women) were included with at least 1-year follow-up (3.3y AB (n = 126), 4.5y ABR (n = 34), and 3y OL (n = 62)). At baseline, patients with high BMI (37(17%)) had significantly worse QuickDASH Pain subscores (2.9 ± 1.0, P value <.05) and QuickDASH (46.8 ± 21.6, P value < .001) scores compared to all other BMI groups. All BMI groups had similar QuickDASH (P value .22) and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (P value .69) scores at last follow-up. Complication rates for patients with high BMI were significantly higher in ABR compared to AB (P value .042) and so were reoperation rates in patients with high BMI after OL compared to patients with high BMI after ABR (9.5%, P value .049).

Conclusion

Patients with high BMI showed significantly worse baseline functional scores but no difference was found in postoperative functional scores between BMI groups. Complication rates were significantly higher in patients with high BMI following ABR compared to AB, and so were reoperation rates in patients with high BMI undergoing Latarjet compared to AB.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信