Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of fistulae in cleft palate repair: A quality improvement study

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Nitisha Narayan , Suhavi Kapoor , Alistair Cobb , Neil McLean , David David , Shaheel Chummun
{"title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of fistulae in cleft palate repair: A quality improvement study","authors":"Nitisha Narayan ,&nbsp;Suhavi Kapoor ,&nbsp;Alistair Cobb ,&nbsp;Neil McLean ,&nbsp;David David ,&nbsp;Shaheel Chummun","doi":"10.1016/j.jpra.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Post-operative infection following cleft palate repair can lead to wound dehiscence and subsequent fistula formation. To prevent this, many surgeons advocate using post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis. The use of antibiotics in children is not without risks and with limited published data and variability both countrywide and in our unit, we wanted to address this research question.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess fistula rates and whether the provision of antibiotics post-operatively affected the incidence of oronasal fistula formation in patients with cleft palate.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We performed an institutional retrospective study using data from patients undergoing primary palatoplasty between August 2021 and August 2022. These patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A included patients who received antibiotics only on induction and Group B additionally received post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis for 7 days. All participants (97) were evaluated for incidence of post-operative fistula formation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no evidence to suggest a difference in the fistula rate between the different timings of antibiotic regimen in Cycle 1; on induction + 2 intravenous doses (Group A) P = 0.807 and 7 days post-operatively (Group B) P = 0.820. Also, in cycle 2 there was no difference in the fistula rates between the 2 groups; P = 0.546 for Group A and P = 0.571 for Group B.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study suggests that the use of antibiotics post-operatively does not influence the formation of post-operative fistulae in cleft palate. This calls for a national randomised controlled study to answer this research question and achieve standardisation of practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37996,"journal":{"name":"JPRAS Open","volume":"43 ","pages":"Pages 377-383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPRAS Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Post-operative infection following cleft palate repair can lead to wound dehiscence and subsequent fistula formation. To prevent this, many surgeons advocate using post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis. The use of antibiotics in children is not without risks and with limited published data and variability both countrywide and in our unit, we wanted to address this research question.

Objective

To assess fistula rates and whether the provision of antibiotics post-operatively affected the incidence of oronasal fistula formation in patients with cleft palate.

Methodology

We performed an institutional retrospective study using data from patients undergoing primary palatoplasty between August 2021 and August 2022. These patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A included patients who received antibiotics only on induction and Group B additionally received post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis for 7 days. All participants (97) were evaluated for incidence of post-operative fistula formation.

Results

There was no evidence to suggest a difference in the fistula rate between the different timings of antibiotic regimen in Cycle 1; on induction + 2 intravenous doses (Group A) P = 0.807 and 7 days post-operatively (Group B) P = 0.820. Also, in cycle 2 there was no difference in the fistula rates between the 2 groups; P = 0.546 for Group A and P = 0.571 for Group B.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the use of antibiotics post-operatively does not influence the formation of post-operative fistulae in cleft palate. This calls for a national randomised controlled study to answer this research question and achieve standardisation of practice.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JPRAS Open
JPRAS Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: JPRAS Open is an international, open access journal dedicated to publishing case reports, short communications, and full-length articles. JPRAS Open will provide the most current source of information and references in plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. The Journal is based on the continued need to improve surgical care by providing highlights in general reconstructive surgery; cleft lip, palate and craniofacial surgery; head and neck surgery; skin cancer; breast surgery; hand surgery; lower limb trauma; burns; and aesthetic surgery. The Journal will provide authors with fast publication times.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信