Postinsertion Management of Cholecystostomy Tubes for Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Andrea Spota, Ali Shahabi, Emma Mizdrak, Marina Englesakis, Fabiha Mahbub, Eran Shlomovitz, Eisar Al-Sukhni
{"title":"Postinsertion Management of Cholecystostomy Tubes for Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Andrea Spota, Ali Shahabi, Emma Mizdrak, Marina Englesakis, Fabiha Mahbub, Eran Shlomovitz, Eisar Al-Sukhni","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PGD) is indicated to treat high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis. Trends suggest increasing use of PGD over time as the population ages and lives longer with multiple comorbidities. There is no consensus on the management of cholecystostomies tube once inserted. This review aims to synthesize and describe the most common protocols in terms of the need and timing of follow-up imaging, management of a destination tube, timing of tube removal, and optimal interval time from tube positioning to delayed cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study protocol has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews-PROSPERO. Studies on adult patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis who underwent a PGD from 2000 to November 2023 were included. The databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. The quality assessment tools provided by the NHLBI (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute) were applied and descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 22,349 patients from 94 studies with overall fair quality (6 prospective and 88 retrospective). In 92.7% of papers, the authors checked by imaging all patients with a PGD (41 studies included). Depending on protocol time, 30% of studies performed imaging within the first 2 weeks and 35% before tube removal (40 studies included). In the case of a destination tube, 56% of studies reported removing the tube (25 studies included). In the case of tube removal, the mean time after insertion was more than 4 weeks in 24 of the 33 included studies (73%). Interval cholecystectomies are more frequently performed after 5 weeks from PGD (32/38 included studies, 84%). Limitations included high clinical heterogeneity and prevalent retrospective studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A standard management for percutaneous cholecystostomy after insertion is difficult to define based on existing evidence, and currently we can only rely on the most common existing protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PGD) is indicated to treat high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis. Trends suggest increasing use of PGD over time as the population ages and lives longer with multiple comorbidities. There is no consensus on the management of cholecystostomies tube once inserted. This review aims to synthesize and describe the most common protocols in terms of the need and timing of follow-up imaging, management of a destination tube, timing of tube removal, and optimal interval time from tube positioning to delayed cholecystectomy.

Methods: The study protocol has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews-PROSPERO. Studies on adult patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis who underwent a PGD from 2000 to November 2023 were included. The databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. The quality assessment tools provided by the NHLBI (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute) were applied and descriptive statistics were performed.

Results: We included 22,349 patients from 94 studies with overall fair quality (6 prospective and 88 retrospective). In 92.7% of papers, the authors checked by imaging all patients with a PGD (41 studies included). Depending on protocol time, 30% of studies performed imaging within the first 2 weeks and 35% before tube removal (40 studies included). In the case of a destination tube, 56% of studies reported removing the tube (25 studies included). In the case of tube removal, the mean time after insertion was more than 4 weeks in 24 of the 33 included studies (73%). Interval cholecystectomies are more frequently performed after 5 weeks from PGD (32/38 included studies, 84%). Limitations included high clinical heterogeneity and prevalent retrospective studies.

Conclusions: A standard management for percutaneous cholecystostomy after insertion is difficult to define based on existing evidence, and currently we can only rely on the most common existing protocols.

急性胆囊炎胆囊造瘘管置入后的处理:系统回顾。
背景:经皮胆囊引流术(PGD)是治疗高危急性胆囊炎的有效方法。趋势表明,随着人口老龄化和多重合并症的寿命延长,PGD的使用随着时间的推移而增加。胆囊造口管置入后的处理尚无共识。本综述旨在综合和描述最常见的方案,包括随访成像的需要和时间、目的管的管理、取管的时间以及从置管到延迟胆囊切除术的最佳间隔时间。方法:该研究方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册- prospero上注册。研究纳入了2000年至2023年11月期间接受PGD的诊断为急性胆囊炎的成年患者。检索的数据库包括MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane。采用NHLBI (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute)提供的质量评估工具,并进行描述性统计。结果:我们纳入了来自94项研究的22,349例患者,总体质量公平(6项前瞻性研究,88项回顾性研究)。在92.7%的论文中,作者通过影像学检查所有PGD患者(包括41项研究)。根据治疗时间的不同,30%的研究在前2周内进行了影像学检查,35%的研究在拔管前进行了影像学检查(包括40项研究)。在目的管的情况下,56%的研究报告了移除管(包括25项研究)。33项纳入的研究中有24项(73%)拔管后的平均时间超过4周。间隔胆囊切除术更常在PGD后5周进行(32/38纳入研究,84%)。局限性包括较高的临床异质性和流行的回顾性研究。结论:经皮置入后胆囊造瘘的标准处理很难根据现有的证据来确定,目前我们只能依靠最常见的现有方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信