Stijntje W Dijk, Eline Krijkamp, M G Myriam Hunink
{"title":"Economic evaluation of resilience training for medical students: A cohort state-transition model.","authors":"Stijntje W Dijk, Eline Krijkamp, M G Myriam Hunink","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2459371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resilience training shows moderate effect in combatting burnout, yet little is known about its cost-effectiveness. This study analyzes the cost-effectiveness of offering resilience training to medical students with elevated stress from a Dutch university medical center (payer) perspective compared to mental health support as usual.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We constructed a state-transition cohort (Markov) model to estimate quality-adjusted lifeyears and associated costs of offering resilience training to a cohort of 410 first-year medical students over a 6-year timeframe. Utility values were obtained through baseline data from the DEcrease STress through RESilience training for Students (DESTRESS) study. Data on transition probabilities and the effect of resilience training were based on the best available literature. We resampled all data to generate 10,000 simulations of incremental costs and effects in a probabilistic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average students gained 0.15 QALYs (95%CI 0.09, 0.20) at a cost-saving of €1076 (95%CI 412, 2008), making resilience training the dominant strategy. These savings resulted from an assumed reduction in study delay due to a reduction in symptoms of stress and burnout. For every euro the university invests in resilience training, we estimatea return of investment of €2.79.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence that offering resilience training to medical students is cost-effective and cost-saving.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2459371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Resilience training shows moderate effect in combatting burnout, yet little is known about its cost-effectiveness. This study analyzes the cost-effectiveness of offering resilience training to medical students with elevated stress from a Dutch university medical center (payer) perspective compared to mental health support as usual.
Methods: We constructed a state-transition cohort (Markov) model to estimate quality-adjusted lifeyears and associated costs of offering resilience training to a cohort of 410 first-year medical students over a 6-year timeframe. Utility values were obtained through baseline data from the DEcrease STress through RESilience training for Students (DESTRESS) study. Data on transition probabilities and the effect of resilience training were based on the best available literature. We resampled all data to generate 10,000 simulations of incremental costs and effects in a probabilistic analysis.
Results: On average students gained 0.15 QALYs (95%CI 0.09, 0.20) at a cost-saving of €1076 (95%CI 412, 2008), making resilience training the dominant strategy. These savings resulted from an assumed reduction in study delay due to a reduction in symptoms of stress and burnout. For every euro the university invests in resilience training, we estimatea return of investment of €2.79.
Conclusions: This study provides evidence that offering resilience training to medical students is cost-effective and cost-saving.
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.