Psychological readiness of return to sport after arthroscopic Bankart repair: A systematic review

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Ryan W. Paul , Alim Osman , Jordan T. Windsor , Charlotte Slavick , Anthony A. Romeo , Brandon J. Erickson
{"title":"Psychological readiness of return to sport after arthroscopic Bankart repair: A systematic review","authors":"Ryan W. Paul ,&nbsp;Alim Osman ,&nbsp;Jordan T. Windsor ,&nbsp;Charlotte Slavick ,&nbsp;Anthony A. Romeo ,&nbsp;Brandon J. Erickson","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2024.12.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Surveys such as the Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) scores can help identify athletes who are better prepared to return to sport (RTS) after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR). Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to clarify how psychologically ready athletes are to RTS after ABR, with the secondary purpose of evaluating the impact of psychological readiness on athletes’ ability to RTSS after ABR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Ovid Medline, PubMed, and SportDiscus databases were searched from inception until January 2023 using keywords such as Bankart, anterior labral repair, shoulder stabilization, return to play, and return to sport. Original studies were included if both RTS outcomes after ABR and a psychological factor were reported, with potential psychological factors being psychological readiness to RTS and reasons of failing to RTS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 707 studies were screened and 16 met criteria for inclusion. The mean MINORS score of included studies was 13.3 ± 4.1. In patients who failed to RTS, most (74 %) patients failed due to recurrent shoulder instability, pain, or injury, while 26 % reported failing to RTS due to non-shoulder related causes such as apprehension and fear of reinjury. Eight studies evaluated post-operative SIRSI scores with a mean of 65.4 (95 % CI: 62.9–72.8) at an average of 5.4 years post-operatively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Most athletes fail to RTS due to shoulder-related causes, with apprehension and fear of reinjury as common causes as shoulder-independent causes for failed RTS. The mean SIRSI score after ABR was 65.4, and athletes with higher post-operative SIRSI scores were more likely to RTS.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"66 ","pages":"Pages 43-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24004616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Surveys such as the Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) scores can help identify athletes who are better prepared to return to sport (RTS) after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR). Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to clarify how psychologically ready athletes are to RTS after ABR, with the secondary purpose of evaluating the impact of psychological readiness on athletes’ ability to RTSS after ABR.

Methods

The Ovid Medline, PubMed, and SportDiscus databases were searched from inception until January 2023 using keywords such as Bankart, anterior labral repair, shoulder stabilization, return to play, and return to sport. Original studies were included if both RTS outcomes after ABR and a psychological factor were reported, with potential psychological factors being psychological readiness to RTS and reasons of failing to RTS.

Results

Overall, 707 studies were screened and 16 met criteria for inclusion. The mean MINORS score of included studies was 13.3 ± 4.1. In patients who failed to RTS, most (74 %) patients failed due to recurrent shoulder instability, pain, or injury, while 26 % reported failing to RTS due to non-shoulder related causes such as apprehension and fear of reinjury. Eight studies evaluated post-operative SIRSI scores with a mean of 65.4 (95 % CI: 62.9–72.8) at an average of 5.4 years post-operatively.

Conclusion

Most athletes fail to RTS due to shoulder-related causes, with apprehension and fear of reinjury as common causes as shoulder-independent causes for failed RTS. The mean SIRSI score after ABR was 65.4, and athletes with higher post-operative SIRSI scores were more likely to RTS.

Level of evidence

IV.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信