Missing the message to brain tumor patients: a 2023 twitter analysis among patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals in glioblastoma multiforme.
Jay A Jani, David Cowan, Lionel Ouonkap, Daniel Adesina, Tianwen Ma, Shumeng Chen, Salman Aldakhil, Kimberly B Hoang
{"title":"Missing the message to brain tumor patients: a 2023 twitter analysis among patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals in glioblastoma multiforme.","authors":"Jay A Jani, David Cowan, Lionel Ouonkap, Daniel Adesina, Tianwen Ma, Shumeng Chen, Salman Aldakhil, Kimberly B Hoang","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-04948-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Social media platforms, particularly Twitter (X), play an important role in healthcare communication by sharing information and personal disease experiences. We investigated glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) posting behaviors on Twitter by comparing patient and informal caregiver tweets to healthcare professional tweets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Keyhole, a third-party analytics tool, we analyzed 1,639 tweets containing the keyword \"#glioblastoma\" from January 1 to December 31, 2023. Users were categorized as patients, informal caregivers, or healthcare professionals. We employed Generalized Estimating Equation models and multinomial distributions to compare sentiment, thematic, and frequency engagement patterns across stakeholder groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Informal caregivers produced the slight majority of tweets (51.6%), followed by healthcare professionals (39.0%). Informal caregivers expressed significantly more negative sentiments (relative to neutral ones) than healthcare professionals (p < 0.001). Thematic analysis revealed that patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) engaged in more emotional support than healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals were more likely than patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) to self-promote. Patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) tweeted more on survival/mortality than healthcare professionals. Additionally, patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) had a higher average posting frequency per user than healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that GBM patients and informal caregivers were more likely to discuss emotional aspects of GBM care, while healthcare professionals had more informational and professional motives. Healthcare professionals who address these emotional, social, and financial communication disconnects can make their social media engagement more meaningful to patients who are often at least one of the primary targets of these accounts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-04948-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Social media platforms, particularly Twitter (X), play an important role in healthcare communication by sharing information and personal disease experiences. We investigated glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) posting behaviors on Twitter by comparing patient and informal caregiver tweets to healthcare professional tweets.
Methods: Using Keyhole, a third-party analytics tool, we analyzed 1,639 tweets containing the keyword "#glioblastoma" from January 1 to December 31, 2023. Users were categorized as patients, informal caregivers, or healthcare professionals. We employed Generalized Estimating Equation models and multinomial distributions to compare sentiment, thematic, and frequency engagement patterns across stakeholder groups.
Results: Informal caregivers produced the slight majority of tweets (51.6%), followed by healthcare professionals (39.0%). Informal caregivers expressed significantly more negative sentiments (relative to neutral ones) than healthcare professionals (p < 0.001). Thematic analysis revealed that patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) engaged in more emotional support than healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals were more likely than patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) to self-promote. Patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) tweeted more on survival/mortality than healthcare professionals. Additionally, patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) had a higher average posting frequency per user than healthcare professionals.
Conclusion: Our findings indicate that GBM patients and informal caregivers were more likely to discuss emotional aspects of GBM care, while healthcare professionals had more informational and professional motives. Healthcare professionals who address these emotional, social, and financial communication disconnects can make their social media engagement more meaningful to patients who are often at least one of the primary targets of these accounts.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
