Quantitative visualization of gastrointestinal motility in critically ill patients using a non-invasive single-channel electro amplifier: A prospective observational cohort feasibility study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Gen Aikawa, Tetsuya Hoshino, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Akira Ouchi, Mitsuki Ikeda, Misaki Kotani, Saiko Okamoto, Yuki Enomoto, Nobutake Shimojo, Yoshiaki Inoue
{"title":"Quantitative visualization of gastrointestinal motility in critically ill patients using a non-invasive single-channel electro amplifier: A prospective observational cohort feasibility study.","authors":"Gen Aikawa, Tetsuya Hoshino, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Akira Ouchi, Mitsuki Ikeda, Misaki Kotani, Saiko Okamoto, Yuki Enomoto, Nobutake Shimojo, Yoshiaki Inoue","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using electrogastrography (EGG)/electroenterography (EEnG) to quantitatively visualize gastrointestinal (GI) motor function in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EGG/EEnG were performed at baseline and before and after nutrition in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Enteral nutrition varied in content. Dominant frequency (DF), dominant power (DP), and power ratio (PR) were calculated and compared with those from healthy controls (previous study; n = 50).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 20 % of patients were unstable and could not be analyzed. Of the 54 patients analyzed, 41 were on enteral nutrition, and their age and body mass index differed from controls. Gastric DF differed significantly between critically ill patients and controls (p < 0.001). No significant difference was noted in gastric log<sub>10</sub> DP between pre- and post-prandial periods in critically ill patients (2.79 vs 2.86, p = 0.328), but controls showed a significant increase (3.04 vs 3.22, p = 0.009). Critically ill patients had lower gastric log<sub>10</sub> DP than controls (pre-prandial p = 0.038; post-prandial p = 0.003). In the small intestine, log<sub>10</sub> DP did not differ significantly between pre- and post-prandial periods in critically ill patients (1.45 vs 1.52, p = 0.181), but controls showed a significant increase (1.70 vs 1.86, p < 0.001). Critically ill patients had lower small intestinal log<sub>10</sub> DP than controls (pre-prandial p = 0.004; post-prandial p < 0.001). PR was inferior in critically ill patients than in controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EGG/EEnG could enable quantitative visualization of GI motor function in critically ill patients. Larger studies can determine the association of GI symptoms with risk factors and prognostic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"87 ","pages":"155031"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using electrogastrography (EGG)/electroenterography (EEnG) to quantitatively visualize gastrointestinal (GI) motor function in critically ill patients.

Methods: EGG/EEnG were performed at baseline and before and after nutrition in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Enteral nutrition varied in content. Dominant frequency (DF), dominant power (DP), and power ratio (PR) were calculated and compared with those from healthy controls (previous study; n = 50).

Results: Data from 20 % of patients were unstable and could not be analyzed. Of the 54 patients analyzed, 41 were on enteral nutrition, and their age and body mass index differed from controls. Gastric DF differed significantly between critically ill patients and controls (p < 0.001). No significant difference was noted in gastric log10 DP between pre- and post-prandial periods in critically ill patients (2.79 vs 2.86, p = 0.328), but controls showed a significant increase (3.04 vs 3.22, p = 0.009). Critically ill patients had lower gastric log10 DP than controls (pre-prandial p = 0.038; post-prandial p = 0.003). In the small intestine, log10 DP did not differ significantly between pre- and post-prandial periods in critically ill patients (1.45 vs 1.52, p = 0.181), but controls showed a significant increase (1.70 vs 1.86, p < 0.001). Critically ill patients had lower small intestinal log10 DP than controls (pre-prandial p = 0.004; post-prandial p < 0.001). PR was inferior in critically ill patients than in controls.

Conclusions: EGG/EEnG could enable quantitative visualization of GI motor function in critically ill patients. Larger studies can determine the association of GI symptoms with risk factors and prognostic factors.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信