Quantitative visualization of gastrointestinal motility in critically ill patients using a non-invasive single-channel electro amplifier: A prospective observational cohort feasibility study.
{"title":"Quantitative visualization of gastrointestinal motility in critically ill patients using a non-invasive single-channel electro amplifier: A prospective observational cohort feasibility study.","authors":"Gen Aikawa, Tetsuya Hoshino, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Akira Ouchi, Mitsuki Ikeda, Misaki Kotani, Saiko Okamoto, Yuki Enomoto, Nobutake Shimojo, Yoshiaki Inoue","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using electrogastrography (EGG)/electroenterography (EEnG) to quantitatively visualize gastrointestinal (GI) motor function in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EGG/EEnG were performed at baseline and before and after nutrition in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Enteral nutrition varied in content. Dominant frequency (DF), dominant power (DP), and power ratio (PR) were calculated and compared with those from healthy controls (previous study; n = 50).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 20 % of patients were unstable and could not be analyzed. Of the 54 patients analyzed, 41 were on enteral nutrition, and their age and body mass index differed from controls. Gastric DF differed significantly between critically ill patients and controls (p < 0.001). No significant difference was noted in gastric log<sub>10</sub> DP between pre- and post-prandial periods in critically ill patients (2.79 vs 2.86, p = 0.328), but controls showed a significant increase (3.04 vs 3.22, p = 0.009). Critically ill patients had lower gastric log<sub>10</sub> DP than controls (pre-prandial p = 0.038; post-prandial p = 0.003). In the small intestine, log<sub>10</sub> DP did not differ significantly between pre- and post-prandial periods in critically ill patients (1.45 vs 1.52, p = 0.181), but controls showed a significant increase (1.70 vs 1.86, p < 0.001). Critically ill patients had lower small intestinal log<sub>10</sub> DP than controls (pre-prandial p = 0.004; post-prandial p < 0.001). PR was inferior in critically ill patients than in controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EGG/EEnG could enable quantitative visualization of GI motor function in critically ill patients. Larger studies can determine the association of GI symptoms with risk factors and prognostic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"87 ","pages":"155031"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using electrogastrography (EGG)/electroenterography (EEnG) to quantitatively visualize gastrointestinal (GI) motor function in critically ill patients.
Methods: EGG/EEnG were performed at baseline and before and after nutrition in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Enteral nutrition varied in content. Dominant frequency (DF), dominant power (DP), and power ratio (PR) were calculated and compared with those from healthy controls (previous study; n = 50).
Results: Data from 20 % of patients were unstable and could not be analyzed. Of the 54 patients analyzed, 41 were on enteral nutrition, and their age and body mass index differed from controls. Gastric DF differed significantly between critically ill patients and controls (p < 0.001). No significant difference was noted in gastric log10 DP between pre- and post-prandial periods in critically ill patients (2.79 vs 2.86, p = 0.328), but controls showed a significant increase (3.04 vs 3.22, p = 0.009). Critically ill patients had lower gastric log10 DP than controls (pre-prandial p = 0.038; post-prandial p = 0.003). In the small intestine, log10 DP did not differ significantly between pre- and post-prandial periods in critically ill patients (1.45 vs 1.52, p = 0.181), but controls showed a significant increase (1.70 vs 1.86, p < 0.001). Critically ill patients had lower small intestinal log10 DP than controls (pre-prandial p = 0.004; post-prandial p < 0.001). PR was inferior in critically ill patients than in controls.
Conclusions: EGG/EEnG could enable quantitative visualization of GI motor function in critically ill patients. Larger studies can determine the association of GI symptoms with risk factors and prognostic factors.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice.
The Journal will include articles which discuss:
All aspects of health services research in critical care
System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine
The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain
Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery
Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients
The team approach in the OR and ICU
System-based research
Medical ethics
Technology in medicine
Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education
Residency Education.