An Open Letter on Advancing HIV prevention: Augmenting an ecosystem-based approach to understand prevention decision-making.

Gates Open Research Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/gatesopenres.16067.2
Nishan Gantayat, James Baer, Alok Gangaramany, Rosemary Pierce-Messick
{"title":"An Open Letter on Advancing HIV prevention: Augmenting an ecosystem-based approach to understand prevention decision-making.","authors":"Nishan Gantayat, James Baer, Alok Gangaramany, Rosemary Pierce-Messick","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.16067.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the last two decades, HIV programs have been able to avert millions of AIDS-related deaths and reduce HIV incidence. However, the 1.3 million new HIV infections in 2022 remain significantly above the UNAIDS target of fewer than 370,000 new infections by 2025. HIV programs worldwide also did not achieve the UN's 90-90-90 target for testing and treatment set for 2020. Within this broader picture, HIV continues to disproportionately affect key and at-risk populations, including gay men and other men who have sex with men, female sex workers, and adolescent girls and young women. As HIV incidence declines and biomedical advances continue, it will become critical for public-health practitioners to reach key and at-risk populations with prevention services and limit primary transmission. In this Open Letter, we focus on factors that influence uptake of HIV prevention products and thereby demand for HIV prevention products and services. These factors exist at three levels of the decision-making ecosystem - the individual level, interaction level and systemic level. We argue that approaching HIV prevention solely through the lens of these levels creates a static view of prevention decision-making. There is a need instead for a dynamic viewpoint that can mirror the changing contexts in which users find themselves and make prevention decisions. We demonstrate that the current ecosystem viewpoint is useful to understand the gaps that exist in program implementation, but does not provide adequate insights into the underlying behaviors that contribute to these gaps. To address this, we suggest an approach to include dynamic aspects of decision-making with factors that influence the individual's assessment of risk, their evaluation of the opportunities to use HIV prevention, and their effective use of prevention products.</p>","PeriodicalId":12593,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":"8 ","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.16067.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last two decades, HIV programs have been able to avert millions of AIDS-related deaths and reduce HIV incidence. However, the 1.3 million new HIV infections in 2022 remain significantly above the UNAIDS target of fewer than 370,000 new infections by 2025. HIV programs worldwide also did not achieve the UN's 90-90-90 target for testing and treatment set for 2020. Within this broader picture, HIV continues to disproportionately affect key and at-risk populations, including gay men and other men who have sex with men, female sex workers, and adolescent girls and young women. As HIV incidence declines and biomedical advances continue, it will become critical for public-health practitioners to reach key and at-risk populations with prevention services and limit primary transmission. In this Open Letter, we focus on factors that influence uptake of HIV prevention products and thereby demand for HIV prevention products and services. These factors exist at three levels of the decision-making ecosystem - the individual level, interaction level and systemic level. We argue that approaching HIV prevention solely through the lens of these levels creates a static view of prevention decision-making. There is a need instead for a dynamic viewpoint that can mirror the changing contexts in which users find themselves and make prevention decisions. We demonstrate that the current ecosystem viewpoint is useful to understand the gaps that exist in program implementation, but does not provide adequate insights into the underlying behaviors that contribute to these gaps. To address this, we suggest an approach to include dynamic aspects of decision-making with factors that influence the individual's assessment of risk, their evaluation of the opportunities to use HIV prevention, and their effective use of prevention products.

一封关于推进艾滋病毒预防的公开信:加强基于生态系统的方法来理解预防决策。
在过去的二十年里,艾滋病毒项目已经能够避免数百万与艾滋病有关的死亡,并降低艾滋病毒发病率。然而,2022年新增艾滋病毒感染人数为130万,仍远高于联合国艾滋病规划署到2025年新增感染人数少于37万的目标。世界各地的艾滋病毒项目也没有实现联合国为2020年制定的90-90-90检测和治疗目标。在这一更广泛的情况下,艾滋病毒继续不成比例地影响关键和高危人群,包括男同性恋者和其他男男性行为者、女性性工作者、少女和年轻妇女。随着艾滋病毒发病率的下降和生物医学的不断进步,公共卫生从业人员向关键和高危人群提供预防服务并限制初级传播将变得至关重要。在这封公开信中,我们重点关注影响艾滋病毒预防产品的使用,从而影响对艾滋病毒预防产品和服务的需求的因素。这些因素存在于决策生态系统的三个层面——个体层面、交互层面和系统层面。我们认为,仅仅通过这些层面的镜头来接近艾滋病毒预防,会产生一种静态的预防决策观点。相反,我们需要一种动态的观点,能够反映用户发现自己并做出预防决策的不断变化的环境。我们证明了当前的生态系统观点对于理解项目实施中存在的差距是有用的,但是并没有对导致这些差距的潜在行为提供足够的见解。为了解决这一问题,我们建议采取一种方法,将决策的动态方面纳入影响个人对风险的评估、对使用艾滋病毒预防措施的机会的评估以及对预防产品的有效使用的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gates Open Research
Gates Open Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信