Elina Hynninen, Heli Tolppanen, Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte, Tuukka Tarvasmäki, Veli-Pekka Harjola, Benjamin Deniau, Mari Hongisto, Ewa A Jankowska, Raija Jurkko, Toni Jäntti, Anu Kataja, Alexandre Mebazaa, Tuija Sabell, Alessandro Sionis, Johan Lassus
{"title":"Validation of a biomarker-based mortality score for cardiogenic shock patients: Comparison with a clinical risk score.","authors":"Elina Hynninen, Heli Tolppanen, Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte, Tuukka Tarvasmäki, Veli-Pekka Harjola, Benjamin Deniau, Mari Hongisto, Ewa A Jankowska, Raija Jurkko, Toni Jäntti, Anu Kataja, Alexandre Mebazaa, Tuija Sabell, Alessandro Sionis, Johan Lassus","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the deadliest manifestation of acute heart failure, with persistently high mortality rates and a lack of recent therapeutic breakthroughs. Accurate risk prediction is crucial in clinical decision-making and the design of future clinical trials. We aimed to validate the CLIP score, a biomarker-based risk score comprising cystatin C, lactate, interleukin-6 and NT-proBNP, for predicting mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) related CS, and to compare its predictive value with the previously published CardShock risk score.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The study is a post hoc analysis of the CardShock Study, a prospective, observational European multicentre study on CS. The CLIP score was calculated 12 h after hospital admission, and its ability to predict 90-day mortality was assessed using are under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The discriminative ability of the CLIP score was compared with the CardShock risk score by comparing the AUC's. The cohort was dichotomized into low and high risk groups by the optimal cut-off value derived from the ROC analysis of the CLIP score. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to evaluate risk stratification when combining the CLIP and CardShock risk scores. The cohort (n = 121) comprised 77% (n = 93) men and the median age was 67 years (IQR 61-76). A total of 21% (n = 25) of the patients had non-ACS related CS. The CLIP score demonstrated appropriate predictive accuracy for 90-day mortality (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91), comparable with the CardShock risk score (AUC 0.77 [95% CI 0.69-0.85]; P = 0.064 for comparison). A CLIP score cut-off of 0.28 stratified patients into high risk (65% mortality) and low risk (16% mortality) groups. In addition, incorporating the CLIP score enhanced risk stratification in all CardShock risk score categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CLIP score, calculated within 12 h of hospital admission, accurately predicted 90-day mortality in CS and complemented the CardShock risk score. The biomarker-based score has potential utility in dynamic mortality risk assessment and could inform clinical management and trial design.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15234","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the deadliest manifestation of acute heart failure, with persistently high mortality rates and a lack of recent therapeutic breakthroughs. Accurate risk prediction is crucial in clinical decision-making and the design of future clinical trials. We aimed to validate the CLIP score, a biomarker-based risk score comprising cystatin C, lactate, interleukin-6 and NT-proBNP, for predicting mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) related CS, and to compare its predictive value with the previously published CardShock risk score.
Methods and results: The study is a post hoc analysis of the CardShock Study, a prospective, observational European multicentre study on CS. The CLIP score was calculated 12 h after hospital admission, and its ability to predict 90-day mortality was assessed using are under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The discriminative ability of the CLIP score was compared with the CardShock risk score by comparing the AUC's. The cohort was dichotomized into low and high risk groups by the optimal cut-off value derived from the ROC analysis of the CLIP score. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to evaluate risk stratification when combining the CLIP and CardShock risk scores. The cohort (n = 121) comprised 77% (n = 93) men and the median age was 67 years (IQR 61-76). A total of 21% (n = 25) of the patients had non-ACS related CS. The CLIP score demonstrated appropriate predictive accuracy for 90-day mortality (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91), comparable with the CardShock risk score (AUC 0.77 [95% CI 0.69-0.85]; P = 0.064 for comparison). A CLIP score cut-off of 0.28 stratified patients into high risk (65% mortality) and low risk (16% mortality) groups. In addition, incorporating the CLIP score enhanced risk stratification in all CardShock risk score categories.
Conclusions: The CLIP score, calculated within 12 h of hospital admission, accurately predicted 90-day mortality in CS and complemented the CardShock risk score. The biomarker-based score has potential utility in dynamic mortality risk assessment and could inform clinical management and trial design.
期刊介绍:
ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.