Long-term outcome of a treat-to-target strategy in late-onset rheumatoid arthritis with chronic lung disease: 5-year results of a prospective observational study

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Manami Nomura, Takahiko Sugihara, Hiroyuki Baba, Tadashi Hosoya, Mari Kamiya, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Takumi Matsumoto, Kanae Kubo, Fumio Hirano, Masayo Kojima, Nobuyuki Miyasaka, Shinsuke Yasuda, Masayoshi Harigai
{"title":"Long-term outcome of a treat-to-target strategy in late-onset rheumatoid arthritis with chronic lung disease: 5-year results of a prospective observational study","authors":"Manami Nomura, Takahiko Sugihara, Hiroyuki Baba, Tadashi Hosoya, Mari Kamiya, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Takumi Matsumoto, Kanae Kubo, Fumio Hirano, Masayo Kojima, Nobuyuki Miyasaka, Shinsuke Yasuda, Masayoshi Harigai","doi":"10.1186/s13075-025-03491-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Controlling disease activity and improving physical function would be more difficult in patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA) who have chronic lung disease (CLD) at baseline. Our aim was to evaluate 5-year outcomes of following a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy targeting low disease activity (LDA) in LORA with CLD. Data from 197 methotrexate (MTX)-naïve LORA patients (mean age 74.4 years) from a prospective, monocentric registry were analyzed. Patients were treated with MTX if they had one or more poor prognostic features. If they had interstitial lung disease (ILD), tacrolimus could be administered instead of MTX at the discretion of the attending physician. If patients exhibited no response according to the European League Against Rheumatism criteria at week 12 or had not achieved LDA by week 24, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were started targeting LDA. The primary outcomes were the 5-year simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤ 0.5 by non-responder imputation analysis. Secondary outcomes were serious adverse events (SAEs). Of the 197 LORA patients, 47 had CLD at baseline. The proportion of patients using MTX at baseline was significantly lower in those with than without CLD. Tacrolimus was initiated in 25.5% of the CLD group. The proportion of patients on bDMARDs was higher in those with CLD at year 5. Achievement of SDAI remission at year 5 was 29.8% in patients with CLD and 44.0% in those without CLD (p = 0.555). Achievement of HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5 at year 5 was 36.2% and 45.3% in patients with and without CLD, respectively (p = 0.939). Non-adherence to T2T due to comorbidities or adverse events was observed in 34.0% and 18.7% of the patients with and without CLD, respectively (p = 0.027). Infections requiring hospitalization, deterioration of extra-articular manifestations and fractures were more frequently reported as SAEs in patients with CLD, and multivariable analysis showed that patients with CLD had a higher risk of developing these SAEs (adjusted hazard ratio:2.53, 95% CI 1.60–4.00, p < 0.001). For LORA patients with CLD, the T2T strategy is effective, but comorbidities and SAEs make the implementation of the T2T more difficult.","PeriodicalId":8419,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-025-03491-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controlling disease activity and improving physical function would be more difficult in patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA) who have chronic lung disease (CLD) at baseline. Our aim was to evaluate 5-year outcomes of following a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy targeting low disease activity (LDA) in LORA with CLD. Data from 197 methotrexate (MTX)-naïve LORA patients (mean age 74.4 years) from a prospective, monocentric registry were analyzed. Patients were treated with MTX if they had one or more poor prognostic features. If they had interstitial lung disease (ILD), tacrolimus could be administered instead of MTX at the discretion of the attending physician. If patients exhibited no response according to the European League Against Rheumatism criteria at week 12 or had not achieved LDA by week 24, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were started targeting LDA. The primary outcomes were the 5-year simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤ 0.5 by non-responder imputation analysis. Secondary outcomes were serious adverse events (SAEs). Of the 197 LORA patients, 47 had CLD at baseline. The proportion of patients using MTX at baseline was significantly lower in those with than without CLD. Tacrolimus was initiated in 25.5% of the CLD group. The proportion of patients on bDMARDs was higher in those with CLD at year 5. Achievement of SDAI remission at year 5 was 29.8% in patients with CLD and 44.0% in those without CLD (p = 0.555). Achievement of HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5 at year 5 was 36.2% and 45.3% in patients with and without CLD, respectively (p = 0.939). Non-adherence to T2T due to comorbidities or adverse events was observed in 34.0% and 18.7% of the patients with and without CLD, respectively (p = 0.027). Infections requiring hospitalization, deterioration of extra-articular manifestations and fractures were more frequently reported as SAEs in patients with CLD, and multivariable analysis showed that patients with CLD had a higher risk of developing these SAEs (adjusted hazard ratio:2.53, 95% CI 1.60–4.00, p < 0.001). For LORA patients with CLD, the T2T strategy is effective, but comorbidities and SAEs make the implementation of the T2T more difficult.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1999, Arthritis Research and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal, publishing original articles in the area of musculoskeletal research and therapy as well as, reviews, commentaries and reports. A major focus of the journal is on the immunologic processes leading to inflammation, damage and repair as they relate to autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions, and which inform the translation of this knowledge into advances in clinical care. Original basic, translational and clinical research is considered for publication along with results of early and late phase therapeutic trials, especially as they pertain to the underpinning science that informs clinical observations in interventional studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信