The Use of Different Types of Supraglottic Airway Devices by Medics on a Manikin with Night Vision Goggles: A Pilot Study.

Q3 Medicine
Christoph Janig, Thomas Hummel, Manfred Berres, Arnulf Willms, Tim Piepho
{"title":"The Use of Different Types of Supraglottic Airway Devices by Medics on a Manikin with Night Vision Goggles: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Christoph Janig, Thomas Hummel, Manfred Berres, Arnulf Willms, Tim Piepho","doi":"10.55460/SKUJ-KOPM","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Under normal conditions, the use of a supraglottic airway device (SAD) is safe and effective. There are situations in military environments in which such devices must be used in the dark (e.g., to conceal the team's position). The aim of our study was to evaluate the use of different SADs using night vision goggles (NVG) on a manikin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of 53 medically trained soldiers (paramedics, emergency medical technicians [EMTs] and Combat First Responders Bravo) was given a brief demonstration of how to place three different types of SAD in a manikin's airway. This was followed by randomized use in ambient light and then, after the room was darkened, with NVG. Differences in terms of placement success, placement time, and observed usage problems were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attempt success rates were >91% for all SADs used both in ambient light and with NVG. Median placement times differed significantly between ambient light and NVG (ambient light/NVG: i-gel, 7.2/15.1s; standard laryngeal mask airway [LMA], 15.4/21.5s; laryngeal tube [LT], 13.4/24.3s). In the direct comparison of the various SADs, the i-gel laryngeal mask airway was placed significantly faster than a standard LMA (P<.0001) and the LT (P<.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study proves that the use of NVG has a measurable impact on the speed of placement but does not prolong placement to a clinically significant extent on a manikin. In addition, there was no significant difference in the placement success for each SAD in ambient light or with NVG. Furthermore, all participants were able to read the size information on the various SADs when wearing NVG and were thus able to make a proper size selection. It would, however, make use easier if additional size markings were added. SADs can be applied quickly and safely on the manikin even when NVG are worn. Differences in the use of the various types of SAD are not relevant from a clinical perspective. Using NVG while placing a SAD seems to be safe for the patient and might increase safety for the care provider in tactical situations by maintaining concealment in dark environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/SKUJ-KOPM","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Under normal conditions, the use of a supraglottic airway device (SAD) is safe and effective. There are situations in military environments in which such devices must be used in the dark (e.g., to conceal the team's position). The aim of our study was to evaluate the use of different SADs using night vision goggles (NVG) on a manikin.

Methods: A group of 53 medically trained soldiers (paramedics, emergency medical technicians [EMTs] and Combat First Responders Bravo) was given a brief demonstration of how to place three different types of SAD in a manikin's airway. This was followed by randomized use in ambient light and then, after the room was darkened, with NVG. Differences in terms of placement success, placement time, and observed usage problems were compared.

Results: Attempt success rates were >91% for all SADs used both in ambient light and with NVG. Median placement times differed significantly between ambient light and NVG (ambient light/NVG: i-gel, 7.2/15.1s; standard laryngeal mask airway [LMA], 15.4/21.5s; laryngeal tube [LT], 13.4/24.3s). In the direct comparison of the various SADs, the i-gel laryngeal mask airway was placed significantly faster than a standard LMA (P<.0001) and the LT (P<.0001).

Conclusions: Our study proves that the use of NVG has a measurable impact on the speed of placement but does not prolong placement to a clinically significant extent on a manikin. In addition, there was no significant difference in the placement success for each SAD in ambient light or with NVG. Furthermore, all participants were able to read the size information on the various SADs when wearing NVG and were thus able to make a proper size selection. It would, however, make use easier if additional size markings were added. SADs can be applied quickly and safely on the manikin even when NVG are worn. Differences in the use of the various types of SAD are not relevant from a clinical perspective. Using NVG while placing a SAD seems to be safe for the patient and might increase safety for the care provider in tactical situations by maintaining concealment in dark environments.

医生在带夜视镜的人体模型上使用不同类型的声门上气道设备:一项试点研究。
简介:在正常情况下,使用声门上气道装置(SAD)是安全有效的。在军事环境中,有些情况下,这种装置必须在黑暗中使用(例如,隐藏团队的位置)。本研究的目的是在人体上使用夜视镜(NVG)来评估不同SADs的使用情况。方法:一组53名受过医学训练的士兵(护理人员,紧急医疗技术人员[EMTs]和战斗第一响应者)简要演示了如何将三种不同类型的SAD放置在人体气道中。然后在环境光下随机使用,然后在房间变暗后,使用NVG。比较了放置成功、放置时间和观察到的使用问题方面的差异。结果:在环境光和NVG下,所有SADs的尝试成功率均为91%。环境光和NVG的中位放置时间差异显著(环境光/NVG: i-gel, 7.2/15.1s;标准喉罩气道[LMA], 15.4/21.5s;喉管[LT], 13.4/24.3s)。在各种SADs的直接比较中,i-凝胶喉罩气道的放置速度明显快于标准LMA (p结论:我们的研究证明,NVG的使用对人体模型的放置速度有可测量的影响,但不会延长放置到临床显著程度。此外,在环境光或NVG下,每种SAD的放置成功率没有显着差异。此外,所有参与者都能够在穿着NVG时读取各种SADs上的尺寸信息,从而能够做出适当的尺寸选择。然而,如果添加额外的尺寸标记,使用起来会更容易。即使在佩戴NVG的情况下,SADs也可以快速安全地应用于人体模型。从临床角度来看,不同类型SAD的使用差异并不相关。在放置SAD的同时使用NVG似乎对患者是安全的,并且可以通过在黑暗环境中保持隐蔽性来增加护理提供者在战术情况下的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信