Exploring augmentative & alternative communication assessment practices for children with limited functional speech & motor skills: a scoping review utilizing the Participation Model of AAC.
Juno Coan-Brill, Gail Teachman, F Aileen Costigan, Theresa Pham, B J Cunningham
{"title":"Exploring augmentative & alternative communication assessment practices for children with limited functional speech & motor skills: a scoping review utilizing the Participation Model of AAC.","authors":"Juno Coan-Brill, Gail Teachman, F Aileen Costigan, Theresa Pham, B J Cunningham","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2454253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Children with limited speech and motor function, frequently subsequent to neurodevelopmental conditions, often require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Assessment practices to inform effective AAC interventions for these children can be challenging because of the considerable heterogeneity and range of factors that require consideration. An improved understanding of current assessment practices is imperative to optimize the provision of AAC.</p><p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> We conducted a scoping review to identify the assessment practices used with children with limited speech and motor function subsequent to neurodevelopmental conditions (birth to 18 years) within the Participation Model of AAC.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> In total, 171 assessment practices were identified. Almost all were related to access supports and barriers, of which the majority focused on children's capabilities. Relatively few methods were identified to support the assessment of children's participation patterns and communication needs or opportunity supports and barriers. Twenty-three percent of identified formal assessment practices required modifications to established procedures, and 10% could not be completed by all child participants.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Identified assessment practices focused primarily on children and their abilities, whereas very few focused on external factors (e.g., environmental and opportunity supports and barriers). Additionally, identified assessment practices may inaccurately measure the abilities of children with limited speech and motor function, as the procedures often required modification.</p><p><p>IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONWithout adequate practices to assess all areas of the Participation Model, clinicians may have difficulty providing comprehensive AAC servicesFuture research should focus on developing practices to assess children's opportunity and environmental supports and barriersThere is a need for practices that are more accessible to children with limited speech and motor function.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2454253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Children with limited speech and motor function, frequently subsequent to neurodevelopmental conditions, often require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Assessment practices to inform effective AAC interventions for these children can be challenging because of the considerable heterogeneity and range of factors that require consideration. An improved understanding of current assessment practices is imperative to optimize the provision of AAC.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a scoping review to identify the assessment practices used with children with limited speech and motor function subsequent to neurodevelopmental conditions (birth to 18 years) within the Participation Model of AAC.
Results: In total, 171 assessment practices were identified. Almost all were related to access supports and barriers, of which the majority focused on children's capabilities. Relatively few methods were identified to support the assessment of children's participation patterns and communication needs or opportunity supports and barriers. Twenty-three percent of identified formal assessment practices required modifications to established procedures, and 10% could not be completed by all child participants.
Conclusion: Identified assessment practices focused primarily on children and their abilities, whereas very few focused on external factors (e.g., environmental and opportunity supports and barriers). Additionally, identified assessment practices may inaccurately measure the abilities of children with limited speech and motor function, as the procedures often required modification.
IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONWithout adequate practices to assess all areas of the Participation Model, clinicians may have difficulty providing comprehensive AAC servicesFuture research should focus on developing practices to assess children's opportunity and environmental supports and barriersThere is a need for practices that are more accessible to children with limited speech and motor function.