How does activity context relate to parents’ responses to preschoolers’ errors and correct math statements?

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Can Çarkoğlu, Sarah H. Eason
{"title":"How does activity context relate to parents’ responses to preschoolers’ errors and correct math statements?","authors":"Can Çarkoğlu,&nbsp;Sarah H. Eason","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research shows that parent–child math activities in the home positively relate to children’s math learning. Although there is evidence suggesting that the nature of parent guidance during these interactions is important for children’s math learning, it is unclear how parents respond to preschoolers’ errors and correct math statements and whether responses vary across activity contexts. We examined parents’ responses to errors and correct statements during structured math activities with 49 dyads of parents and 4- and 5-year-olds. Dyads were assigned to either an Informal Learning condition (<em>n</em> = 25) or a Formal Learning condition (<em>n</em> = 24). We identified instances where children responded correctly or incorrectly to math prompts and coded parents’ feedback based on the extent to which it supported children’s autonomy and learning. Overall, parents most frequently responded in ways that encouraged children’s continued math engagement and thinking (elaborative guidance). However, multiple regression analyses revealed that parents were more likely to not respond to errors during informal learning than during formal learning, and parents were more likely to give the correct answer following an error during formal learning compared with during informal learning. Parents in both conditions were equally likely to offer elaborative support following errors. Moreover, parents did not differ in their responses following children’s correct statements across conditions. These findings suggest, irrespective of activity context, that parents can realize opportunities to effectively support preschoolers’ math learning. Yet, given differences in parents’ responses to errors, the findings have implications as to how we can tailor recommendations to promote high-quality parent–child math interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 106191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002209652400331X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research shows that parent–child math activities in the home positively relate to children’s math learning. Although there is evidence suggesting that the nature of parent guidance during these interactions is important for children’s math learning, it is unclear how parents respond to preschoolers’ errors and correct math statements and whether responses vary across activity contexts. We examined parents’ responses to errors and correct statements during structured math activities with 49 dyads of parents and 4- and 5-year-olds. Dyads were assigned to either an Informal Learning condition (n = 25) or a Formal Learning condition (n = 24). We identified instances where children responded correctly or incorrectly to math prompts and coded parents’ feedback based on the extent to which it supported children’s autonomy and learning. Overall, parents most frequently responded in ways that encouraged children’s continued math engagement and thinking (elaborative guidance). However, multiple regression analyses revealed that parents were more likely to not respond to errors during informal learning than during formal learning, and parents were more likely to give the correct answer following an error during formal learning compared with during informal learning. Parents in both conditions were equally likely to offer elaborative support following errors. Moreover, parents did not differ in their responses following children’s correct statements across conditions. These findings suggest, irrespective of activity context, that parents can realize opportunities to effectively support preschoolers’ math learning. Yet, given differences in parents’ responses to errors, the findings have implications as to how we can tailor recommendations to promote high-quality parent–child math interactions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信