Predictors of Use of Individual Insulin and GLP-1 RA Products Versus Fixed Ratio Insulin/GLP-1 RA Combinations in Medicare Beneficiaries.

Q2 Medicine
Anthony F Jeter, Brittany L Melton, Bradley J Newell
{"title":"Predictors of Use of Individual Insulin and GLP-1 RA Products Versus Fixed Ratio Insulin/GLP-1 RA Combinations in Medicare Beneficiaries.","authors":"Anthony F Jeter, Brittany L Melton, Bradley J Newell","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2025.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In 2022, federal law capped insulin product costs at $35 per month for Medicare prescription drug plan recipients. However, this law did not address the high costs of other antihyperglycemic medications, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), with an average copay of $120 per month. Under the law, fixed-ratio insulin/GLP-1RA combination products are classified as \"insulin products,\" making these effective medications more accessible to patients who might otherwise be unable to afford them. Patients may not be aware of the potential financial benefits of combination products, highlighting the need to identify those using them to better educate both patients and providers. <b>Objectives:</b> The primary objective was to identify predictors of use for the insulin/GLP-1RA combinations. The secondary objective was to determine if there was a difference in medication cost to patients between individual and combination product users and determine cost savings potential of switching. <b>Design:</b> This was a retrospective, observational cohort analysis. <b>Setting:</b> Prescription fill data were examined for antihyperglycemic medications filled between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022. Prescriptions were filled within one regional division of a large community-based pharmacy chain, encompassing 71 pharmacies within Kansas, Nebraska, and Missouri. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational cohort analysis examined prescription fill data for antihyperglycemic medications for the calendar year 2022 across one regional division of a large community-based pharmacy chain. Included patients 65 years of age or older with a Medicare prescription drug plan, using any basal insulin and any GLP-1RA, including combinations, as well as metformin, with ≥ 80% proportion of days covered. Demographics, usage predictors, and cost differences were compared between patients using individual products and those using insulin/GLP-1RA combination products. <b>Results:</b> A total of 138 patients were analyzed. The use of insulin/GLP-1RA combination products was associated with increased likelihood of using sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (<i>P</i> = 0.022). Median annual out-of-pocket spending was significantly different between groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with most combination users paying more than $1,000 less per year than individual product users. <b>Conclusion:</b> Insulin/GLP-1RA combination products represent a cost-effective alternative to individual antidiabetic pharmacotherapy agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"40 2","pages":"97-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2025.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2022, federal law capped insulin product costs at $35 per month for Medicare prescription drug plan recipients. However, this law did not address the high costs of other antihyperglycemic medications, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), with an average copay of $120 per month. Under the law, fixed-ratio insulin/GLP-1RA combination products are classified as "insulin products," making these effective medications more accessible to patients who might otherwise be unable to afford them. Patients may not be aware of the potential financial benefits of combination products, highlighting the need to identify those using them to better educate both patients and providers. Objectives: The primary objective was to identify predictors of use for the insulin/GLP-1RA combinations. The secondary objective was to determine if there was a difference in medication cost to patients between individual and combination product users and determine cost savings potential of switching. Design: This was a retrospective, observational cohort analysis. Setting: Prescription fill data were examined for antihyperglycemic medications filled between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022. Prescriptions were filled within one regional division of a large community-based pharmacy chain, encompassing 71 pharmacies within Kansas, Nebraska, and Missouri. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort analysis examined prescription fill data for antihyperglycemic medications for the calendar year 2022 across one regional division of a large community-based pharmacy chain. Included patients 65 years of age or older with a Medicare prescription drug plan, using any basal insulin and any GLP-1RA, including combinations, as well as metformin, with ≥ 80% proportion of days covered. Demographics, usage predictors, and cost differences were compared between patients using individual products and those using insulin/GLP-1RA combination products. Results: A total of 138 patients were analyzed. The use of insulin/GLP-1RA combination products was associated with increased likelihood of using sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (P = 0.022). Median annual out-of-pocket spending was significantly different between groups (P < 0.001), with most combination users paying more than $1,000 less per year than individual product users. Conclusion: Insulin/GLP-1RA combination products represent a cost-effective alternative to individual antidiabetic pharmacotherapy agents.

个体胰岛素和GLP-1 RA产品与固定比例胰岛素/GLP-1 RA组合在医疗保险受益人中使用的预测因素
背景:2022年,联邦法律将医疗保险处方药计划接受者的胰岛素产品成本限制在每月35美元。然而,这项法律并没有解决其他抗高血糖药物的高昂费用,如胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs),平均每月共付120美元。根据该法案,固定比例胰岛素/GLP-1RA组合产品被归类为“胰岛素产品”,使这些有效的药物更容易为那些可能负担不起的患者使用。患者可能没有意识到联合用药的潜在经济效益,这突出表明有必要确定使用这些药物的人,以便更好地教育患者和提供者。目的:主要目的是确定胰岛素/GLP-1RA联合使用的预测因素。次要目的是确定单独用药和联合用药对患者的用药成本是否存在差异,并确定切换的成本节约潜力。设计:这是一项回顾性、观察性队列分析。设置:检查2022年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间服用的降糖药物的处方填充数据。处方是在一家大型社区连锁药店的一个区域部门配药的,该连锁药店包括堪萨斯、内布拉斯加州和密苏里州的71家药店。方法:这项回顾性观察性队列分析检查了一家大型社区连锁药店的一个区域部门在2022年的抗高血糖药物处方填充数据。纳入65岁或65岁以上的医疗保险处方药计划患者,使用任何基础胰岛素和任何GLP-1RA,包括联合用药,以及二甲双胍,覆盖天数比例≥80%。比较了使用单个产品的患者和使用胰岛素/GLP-1RA联合产品的患者的人口统计学、使用预测指标和成本差异。结果:共分析138例患者。使用胰岛素/GLP-1RA联合产品与使用钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂的可能性增加相关(P = 0.022)。组之间的年自付支出中位数有显著差异(P < 0.001),大多数组合用户每年比单个产品用户少支付1000美元以上。结论:胰岛素/GLP-1RA联合产品是一种具有成本效益的替代个体降糖药物治疗药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信