Telehealth group intervention for adolescents and young adults with cancer: a feasibility pilot study protocol.

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Sherilynn F Chan, Joanna Patten, Nancy Lau
{"title":"Telehealth group intervention for adolescents and young adults with cancer: a feasibility pilot study protocol.","authors":"Sherilynn F Chan, Joanna Patten, Nancy Lau","doi":"10.1186/s40814-024-01590-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providing opportunities for social interaction and access to psychosocial interventions are 2 of the 15 Standards for Psychosocial Care for Children with Cancer and Their Families. Peer relationships are especially important among adolescents and young adults (AYAs), and cancer disrupts this aspect of social development. Many AYAs with cancer report a desire to engage in peer support groups; however, this remains a critical unmet need. Telehealth is a cost-effective and increasingly common modality for delivering health care that reduces access barriers and may be an especially good fit for AYAs with cancer. Little work has evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of peer support groups for AYAs with cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth peer support group intervention for AYAs with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Telehealth group interventions are offered twice yearly as standard of care at Seattle Children's Hospital to AYAs on or off treatment for cancer or a brain tumor. Group members are assigned to a High School Group (grades 9-12) or an AYA Group (spring of grade 12 or older). Aim 1 is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention for all patients who participate in groups in their clinical care. Feasibility will be assessed based on a priori metrics (enrollment, attendance, attrition) for all group members. Group and telehealth acceptability will be assessed by a 16-item internally developed measure that was adapted from the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Aim 2 is to conduct patient stakeholder semi-structured interviews post-intervention with 20 AYAs to gather feedback and inform intervention refinement. Participants who opt-in for study procedures will also complete exploratory measures of social connectedness/isolation, depression, and benefit finding, pre- and post-intervention (Aim 3).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings from this pilot study will inform intervention refinement, intervention implementation, and sample sizes for future powered trials. This study will provide preliminary empirical evidence to support the development of effective group interventions for AYAs with cancer that increase opportunities for social interaction and access to peer support, with the potential to contribute to improved psychosocial care of AYAs with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01590-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Providing opportunities for social interaction and access to psychosocial interventions are 2 of the 15 Standards for Psychosocial Care for Children with Cancer and Their Families. Peer relationships are especially important among adolescents and young adults (AYAs), and cancer disrupts this aspect of social development. Many AYAs with cancer report a desire to engage in peer support groups; however, this remains a critical unmet need. Telehealth is a cost-effective and increasingly common modality for delivering health care that reduces access barriers and may be an especially good fit for AYAs with cancer. Little work has evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of peer support groups for AYAs with cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth peer support group intervention for AYAs with cancer.

Methods: Telehealth group interventions are offered twice yearly as standard of care at Seattle Children's Hospital to AYAs on or off treatment for cancer or a brain tumor. Group members are assigned to a High School Group (grades 9-12) or an AYA Group (spring of grade 12 or older). Aim 1 is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention for all patients who participate in groups in their clinical care. Feasibility will be assessed based on a priori metrics (enrollment, attendance, attrition) for all group members. Group and telehealth acceptability will be assessed by a 16-item internally developed measure that was adapted from the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Aim 2 is to conduct patient stakeholder semi-structured interviews post-intervention with 20 AYAs to gather feedback and inform intervention refinement. Participants who opt-in for study procedures will also complete exploratory measures of social connectedness/isolation, depression, and benefit finding, pre- and post-intervention (Aim 3).

Discussion: Findings from this pilot study will inform intervention refinement, intervention implementation, and sample sizes for future powered trials. This study will provide preliminary empirical evidence to support the development of effective group interventions for AYAs with cancer that increase opportunities for social interaction and access to peer support, with the potential to contribute to improved psychosocial care of AYAs with cancer.

对患有癌症的青少年和青年的远程保健团体干预:可行性试点研究方案。
背景:提供社会互动机会和获得社会心理干预是癌症儿童及其家庭社会心理护理15项标准中的2项。同伴关系在青少年和年轻人中尤为重要,而癌症破坏了社会发展的这一方面。许多患有癌症的助理助理表示希望参加同伴支持小组;然而,这仍然是一个关键的未满足需求。远程保健是一种具有成本效益且日益普遍的提供保健的方式,减少了获取障碍,可能特别适合患有癌症的aya。很少有研究评估同伴支持小组对癌症aya患者的可行性和可接受性。本研究的目的是评估远程医疗同伴支持团体干预癌症aya的可行性和可接受性。方法:西雅图儿童医院每年两次提供远程医疗小组干预,作为对癌症或脑肿瘤治疗的AYAs的标准护理。小组成员被分配到高中组(9-12年级)或AYA组(12年级春季或以上)。目的1是确定所有参与分组临床护理的患者干预的可行性和可接受性。可行性将根据所有小组成员的先验指标(注册,出勤,人员流失)进行评估。小组和远程保健的可接受性将通过内部制定的一项16项措施进行评估,该措施改编自客户满意度调查表。目标2是在干预后与20名asa进行患者利益相关者半结构化访谈,以收集反馈并为干预改进提供信息。选择参加研究程序的参与者还将完成社会联系/孤立、抑郁和受益发现的探索性测量,干预前和干预后(目标3)。讨论:本试点研究的结果将为未来有力试验的干预改进、干预实施和样本量提供信息。本研究将提供初步的经验证据,以支持对患有癌症的青少年进行有效的群体干预,增加社会互动和获得同伴支持的机会,并有可能有助于改善患癌症的青少年的社会心理护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信