A Rapid-Cycle Intervention to Enhance Patient and Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Heather Pena, Jason Stokes, Lauren Zulueta, Mavis Awuku, Kathryn Bergamesca, Joanna Do, Timothy Espersen, Rebecca Fleetwood, Jenna Knors, Tonda Thomas, Alec Tobey, Julie A Thompson, Bradi B Granger
{"title":"A Rapid-Cycle Intervention to Enhance Patient and Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Heather Pena, Jason Stokes, Lauren Zulueta, Mavis Awuku, Kathryn Bergamesca, Joanna Do, Timothy Espersen, Rebecca Fleetwood, Jenna Knors, Tonda Thomas, Alec Tobey, Julie A Thompson, Bradi B Granger","doi":"10.4037/ccn2025564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient and family satisfaction with care in intensive care units is not reflected in Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys. Gaps may be unknown.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>In a cardiothoracic intensive care unit, patient satisfaction scores were not assessed and gaps could not be addressed. The primary aim was to obtain baseline data on patient and family satisfaction. The secondary aim was to improve identified gaps in satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preintervention-postintervention, 2-cycle quality improvement project and a 12-month sustainability assessment were conducted to evaluate patient and family satisfaction in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit in a large academic health system from August 2022 to August 2023. The Nursing Intensive Care Satisfaction Scale was used to measure patients' satisfaction and the European Quality Questionnaire was used to measure family members' satisfaction with intensive care unit nursing care. Standardized scripting, processes for patient and family engagement during rounds, and structured communication were used to enhance patient and family engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline (47 patients, 35 family members), overall patient and family satisfaction was high (mean [SD] satisfaction scores: patients, 87.6 [19.3]; family members, 94.6 [9.7]; P = .06). After intervention cycle 2, family members (n = 50) had high mean satisfaction scores on the Information Needs sub-scale of the European Quality Questionnaire. Family participation in rounds improved from 18.5% of rounds at baseline to 76.5% after intervention cycle 2 and was 61.5% at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strategies that engage family members in rounds improve communication and satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"45 1","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient and family satisfaction with care in intensive care units is not reflected in Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys. Gaps may be unknown.

Local problem: In a cardiothoracic intensive care unit, patient satisfaction scores were not assessed and gaps could not be addressed. The primary aim was to obtain baseline data on patient and family satisfaction. The secondary aim was to improve identified gaps in satisfaction.

Methods: A preintervention-postintervention, 2-cycle quality improvement project and a 12-month sustainability assessment were conducted to evaluate patient and family satisfaction in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit in a large academic health system from August 2022 to August 2023. The Nursing Intensive Care Satisfaction Scale was used to measure patients' satisfaction and the European Quality Questionnaire was used to measure family members' satisfaction with intensive care unit nursing care. Standardized scripting, processes for patient and family engagement during rounds, and structured communication were used to enhance patient and family engagement.

Results: At baseline (47 patients, 35 family members), overall patient and family satisfaction was high (mean [SD] satisfaction scores: patients, 87.6 [19.3]; family members, 94.6 [9.7]; P = .06). After intervention cycle 2, family members (n = 50) had high mean satisfaction scores on the Information Needs sub-scale of the European Quality Questionnaire. Family participation in rounds improved from 18.5% of rounds at baseline to 76.5% after intervention cycle 2 and was 61.5% at 12 months.

Conclusion: Strategies that engage family members in rounds improve communication and satisfaction.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical care nurse
Critical care nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信