A Rapid-Cycle Intervention to Enhance Patient and Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Heather Pena, Jason Stokes, Lauren Zulueta, Mavis Awuku, Kathryn Bergamesca, Joanna Do, Timothy Espersen, Rebecca Fleetwood, Jenna Knors, Tonda Thomas, Alec Tobey, Julie A Thompson, Bradi B Granger
{"title":"A Rapid-Cycle Intervention to Enhance Patient and Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Heather Pena, Jason Stokes, Lauren Zulueta, Mavis Awuku, Kathryn Bergamesca, Joanna Do, Timothy Espersen, Rebecca Fleetwood, Jenna Knors, Tonda Thomas, Alec Tobey, Julie A Thompson, Bradi B Granger","doi":"10.4037/ccn2025564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient and family satisfaction with care in intensive care units is not reflected in Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys. Gaps may be unknown.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>In a cardiothoracic intensive care unit, patient satisfaction scores were not assessed and gaps could not be addressed. The primary aim was to obtain baseline data on patient and family satisfaction. The secondary aim was to improve identified gaps in satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preintervention-postintervention, 2-cycle quality improvement project and a 12-month sustainability assessment were conducted to evaluate patient and family satisfaction in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit in a large academic health system from August 2022 to August 2023. The Nursing Intensive Care Satisfaction Scale was used to measure patients' satisfaction and the European Quality Questionnaire was used to measure family members' satisfaction with intensive care unit nursing care. Standardized scripting, processes for patient and family engagement during rounds, and structured communication were used to enhance patient and family engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline (47 patients, 35 family members), overall patient and family satisfaction was high (mean [SD] satisfaction scores: patients, 87.6 [19.3]; family members, 94.6 [9.7]; P = .06). After intervention cycle 2, family members (n = 50) had high mean satisfaction scores on the Information Needs sub-scale of the European Quality Questionnaire. Family participation in rounds improved from 18.5% of rounds at baseline to 76.5% after intervention cycle 2 and was 61.5% at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strategies that engage family members in rounds improve communication and satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"45 1","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient and family satisfaction with care in intensive care units is not reflected in Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys. Gaps may be unknown.

Local problem: In a cardiothoracic intensive care unit, patient satisfaction scores were not assessed and gaps could not be addressed. The primary aim was to obtain baseline data on patient and family satisfaction. The secondary aim was to improve identified gaps in satisfaction.

Methods: A preintervention-postintervention, 2-cycle quality improvement project and a 12-month sustainability assessment were conducted to evaluate patient and family satisfaction in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit in a large academic health system from August 2022 to August 2023. The Nursing Intensive Care Satisfaction Scale was used to measure patients' satisfaction and the European Quality Questionnaire was used to measure family members' satisfaction with intensive care unit nursing care. Standardized scripting, processes for patient and family engagement during rounds, and structured communication were used to enhance patient and family engagement.

Results: At baseline (47 patients, 35 family members), overall patient and family satisfaction was high (mean [SD] satisfaction scores: patients, 87.6 [19.3]; family members, 94.6 [9.7]; P = .06). After intervention cycle 2, family members (n = 50) had high mean satisfaction scores on the Information Needs sub-scale of the European Quality Questionnaire. Family participation in rounds improved from 18.5% of rounds at baseline to 76.5% after intervention cycle 2 and was 61.5% at 12 months.

Conclusion: Strategies that engage family members in rounds improve communication and satisfaction.

快速循环干预提高重症监护室患者和家属满意度。
背景:患者和家属对重症监护病房护理的满意度没有反映在医院消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统的评估调查中。差距可能是未知的。局部问题:在心胸重症监护室,没有评估患者满意度评分,也无法解决差距。主要目的是获得患者和家属满意度的基线数据。第二个目标是改善已确定的满意度差距。方法:采用干预前-干预后、2周期质量改善项目和12个月可持续性评估方法,对某大型学术卫生系统心胸重症监护室的患者和家属满意度进行评估。采用护理重症监护满意度量表测量患者满意度,采用欧洲质量问卷测量家属对重症监护护理的满意度。标准化的脚本、查房期间患者和家庭参与的流程以及结构化的沟通用于提高患者和家庭的参与。结果:在基线时(47例患者,35名家庭成员),患者和家庭的总体满意度较高(平均[SD]满意度评分:患者,87.6 [19.3];家庭成员,94.6 [9.7];P = .06)。干预周期2后,家庭成员(n = 50)在欧洲质量问卷的信息需求子量表上的平均满意度得分较高。家庭参与率从基线时的18.5%提高到干预周期2后的76.5%,12个月时为61.5%。结论:家庭成员轮次参与的策略提高了沟通和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical care nurse
Critical care nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信