Attitudes of radiologists and interns toward the adoption of GPT-like technologies: a National Survey Study in China.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tianyi Xia, Shijun Zhang, Ben Zhao, Ying Lei, Zebin Xiao, Bingwei Chen, Junhao Zha, Yaoyao Yu, Zhijun Wu, Chunqiang Lu, Tianyu Tang, Yang Song, Yuancheng Wang, Shenghong Ju
{"title":"Attitudes of radiologists and interns toward the adoption of GPT-like technologies: a National Survey Study in China.","authors":"Tianyi Xia, Shijun Zhang, Ben Zhao, Ying Lei, Zebin Xiao, Bingwei Chen, Junhao Zha, Yaoyao Yu, Zhijun Wu, Chunqiang Lu, Tianyu Tang, Yang Song, Yuancheng Wang, Shenghong Ju","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-01908-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the attitudes of Chinese radiologists or interns towards generative pre-trained (GPT)-like technologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective survey was distributed to 1339 Chinese radiologists or interns via an online platform from October 2023 to May 2024. The questionnaire covered respondent characteristics, opinions on using GPT-like technologies (in clinical practice, training and education, environment and regulation, and development trends), and their attitudes toward these technologies. Logistic regression was conducted to identify underlying factors associated with the attitude.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After quality control, 1289 respondents (median age, 37.0 years [IQR, 31.0-44.0 years]; 813 males) were surveyed. Most of the respondents (n = 1223, 94.9%) supported adoption of GPT-like technologies. Based on the acceptance level of GPT-like technologies, the respondents were 3 (0.2%), 29 (2.2%), 352 (27.3%), 677 (52.5%), and 228 (17.7%) from low to high acceptance degrees. Multivariable analysis revealed significant associations between positive attitudes towards GPT-like technologies and their acceptance: writing papers and language polishing (odds ratio [OR] = 1.99; p < 0.001), influence of colleagues using such technologies (OR = 1.77; p = 0.007), government regulation introduction (OR = 2.25; p < 0.001), and enhancement of decision support capabilities (OR = 2.67; p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results for different acceptance thresholds (all p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chinese radiologists or interns generally support GPT-like technologies due to their potential capabilities in clinical practice, medical education, and scientific research. They also emphasize the need for regulatory oversight and remain optimistic about their future medical applications.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>This study highlights the broad support among Chinese radiologists for GPT-like technologies, emphasizing their potential to enhance clinical decision-making, streamline medical education, and improve research efficiency, while underscoring the need for regulatory oversight.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The impact of GPT-like technologies on the radiology field is unclear. Most Chinese radiologists express the supportive adoption of GPT-like technologies. GPT-like technologies' capabilities at research and clinic prompt the attitude.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-01908-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the attitudes of Chinese radiologists or interns towards generative pre-trained (GPT)-like technologies.

Methods: A prospective survey was distributed to 1339 Chinese radiologists or interns via an online platform from October 2023 to May 2024. The questionnaire covered respondent characteristics, opinions on using GPT-like technologies (in clinical practice, training and education, environment and regulation, and development trends), and their attitudes toward these technologies. Logistic regression was conducted to identify underlying factors associated with the attitude.

Results: After quality control, 1289 respondents (median age, 37.0 years [IQR, 31.0-44.0 years]; 813 males) were surveyed. Most of the respondents (n = 1223, 94.9%) supported adoption of GPT-like technologies. Based on the acceptance level of GPT-like technologies, the respondents were 3 (0.2%), 29 (2.2%), 352 (27.3%), 677 (52.5%), and 228 (17.7%) from low to high acceptance degrees. Multivariable analysis revealed significant associations between positive attitudes towards GPT-like technologies and their acceptance: writing papers and language polishing (odds ratio [OR] = 1.99; p < 0.001), influence of colleagues using such technologies (OR = 1.77; p = 0.007), government regulation introduction (OR = 2.25; p < 0.001), and enhancement of decision support capabilities (OR = 2.67; p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results for different acceptance thresholds (all p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Chinese radiologists or interns generally support GPT-like technologies due to their potential capabilities in clinical practice, medical education, and scientific research. They also emphasize the need for regulatory oversight and remain optimistic about their future medical applications.

Critical relevance statement: This study highlights the broad support among Chinese radiologists for GPT-like technologies, emphasizing their potential to enhance clinical decision-making, streamline medical education, and improve research efficiency, while underscoring the need for regulatory oversight.

Key points: The impact of GPT-like technologies on the radiology field is unclear. Most Chinese radiologists express the supportive adoption of GPT-like technologies. GPT-like technologies' capabilities at research and clinic prompt the attitude.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信