Reducing Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in a Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Sunday Caldwell
{"title":"Reducing Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in a Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Sunday Caldwell","doi":"10.4037/ccn2025980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are a significant patient safety concern. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services tracks hospital-acquired pressure injuries as a patient safety indicator. Health care organizations with higher-than-expected rates may incur penalties.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>The pressure injury prevalence rate in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit was above the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators benchmark. The current standard of care-use of the Braden scale for pressure injury risk assessment and the SKIN (surface, keep turning, incontinence care, and nutrition) care bundle-may not adequately address the needs of the intensive care unit population. In addition, cardiac patients present a special challenge because of their disease process and the mechanical support devices used to treat patients in cardiogenic shock, which place them at risk for the development of hospital-acquired pressure injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A performance improvement project was carried out in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit to reduce the prevalence and incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries. A preintervention convenience cohort was compared with a postintervention cohort. The intervention consisted of use of the Cubbin-Jackson scale, an intensive care unit-specific risk-assessment tool, with linked interventions to prevent pressure injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preintervention and postintervention cohorts consisted of 102 patients each. The pressure injury prevalence and incidence rates decreased by 67.84% and 36.43%, respectively, from before to after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of an intensive care unit-specific risk-assessment tool with linked interventions to prevent pressure injury can help reduce hospital-acquired pressure injuries in an intensive care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"45 1","pages":"12-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are a significant patient safety concern. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services tracks hospital-acquired pressure injuries as a patient safety indicator. Health care organizations with higher-than-expected rates may incur penalties.

Local problem: The pressure injury prevalence rate in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit was above the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators benchmark. The current standard of care-use of the Braden scale for pressure injury risk assessment and the SKIN (surface, keep turning, incontinence care, and nutrition) care bundle-may not adequately address the needs of the intensive care unit population. In addition, cardiac patients present a special challenge because of their disease process and the mechanical support devices used to treat patients in cardiogenic shock, which place them at risk for the development of hospital-acquired pressure injuries.

Methods: A performance improvement project was carried out in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit to reduce the prevalence and incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries. A preintervention convenience cohort was compared with a postintervention cohort. The intervention consisted of use of the Cubbin-Jackson scale, an intensive care unit-specific risk-assessment tool, with linked interventions to prevent pressure injuries.

Results: The preintervention and postintervention cohorts consisted of 102 patients each. The pressure injury prevalence and incidence rates decreased by 67.84% and 36.43%, respectively, from before to after the intervention.

Conclusion: The use of an intensive care unit-specific risk-assessment tool with linked interventions to prevent pressure injury can help reduce hospital-acquired pressure injuries in an intensive care unit.

减少心胸重症监护病房的医院获得性压力伤害。
背景:医院获得性压力损伤是一个重要的患者安全问题。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心将医院获得性压力伤害作为患者安全指标进行跟踪。费率高于预期的医疗机构可能会受到处罚。局部问题:某心胸重症监护病房压伤患病率高于国家护理质量指标数据库基准。目前的护理标准——使用布雷登压力损伤风险评估量表和SKIN(表面、持续翻转、失禁护理和营养)护理包——可能不能充分满足重症监护病房人群的需求。此外,心脏病患者由于其疾病过程和用于治疗心源性休克患者的机械支持装置而面临特殊挑战,这使他们面临院内获得性压力损伤的风险。方法:在心胸重症监护室实施绩效改善项目,降低医院获得性压力损伤的患病率和发生率。将干预前便利队列与干预后队列进行比较。干预措施包括使用Cubbin-Jackson量表,这是一种重症监护病房特有的风险评估工具,并结合相关干预措施来预防压力性损伤。结果:干预前和干预后各有102例患者。干预前后压伤患病率和发生率分别下降67.84%和36.43%。结论:使用重症监护室特定风险评估工具和相关干预措施来预防压力损伤有助于减少重症监护室的医院获得性压力损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical care nurse
Critical care nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信