[Reprocessing of single-use medical devices: Viewpoints and perceptions of cardiologists and hospital pharmacists].

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Samantha Huynh, Adeline Bonan, Judith Pineau, Eloi Marijon, Brigitte Sabatier, Nicolas Martelli
{"title":"[Reprocessing of single-use medical devices: Viewpoints and perceptions of cardiologists and hospital pharmacists].","authors":"Samantha Huynh, Adeline Bonan, Judith Pineau, Eloi Marijon, Brigitte Sabatier, Nicolas Martelli","doi":"10.1016/j.pharma.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A pilot initiative on the reprocessing of medical devices (MD), particularly in electrophysiology, is expected to be launched in France in 2025. Reprocessing single-use medical devices (SUDs) presents potential benefits and challenges, with differing perspectives among healthcare professionals. This study aims to compare the knowledge and positions of hospital pharmacists (HP) and cardiologists (CA) regarding the use of reprocessed single-use devices (R-SUDs), in order to identify their concerns as well as points of convergence and divergence. A directive and mixed electronic questionnaire consisting of 27 questions was sent to HPs and CAs from the Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP). Responses from 32 HPs and 30 CAs were analyzed using statistical methods via R software. The results revealed that CAs overwhelmingly support reprocessing, while HPs show significantly more reservations (P<0.0001). Among HPs, 56% (n=18) favored an \"open\" supply chain model for reprocessing, compared to 28% (n=9) who preferred a \"closed\" one. CAs show a more balanced distribution of their preferences, with 30% (n=9) favoring the \"open\" chain and 40% (n=12) the \"closed\" model. Both groups raised concerns about the safety and quality of reprocessed devices, but the majority would accept R-SUDs if clinical trials validated their safety and effectiveness compared to original SUDs. Reprocessing is nevertheless seen as a means to reduce hospital costs and carbon footprint in hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":8332,"journal":{"name":"Annales pharmaceutiques francaises","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales pharmaceutiques francaises","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2025.01.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A pilot initiative on the reprocessing of medical devices (MD), particularly in electrophysiology, is expected to be launched in France in 2025. Reprocessing single-use medical devices (SUDs) presents potential benefits and challenges, with differing perspectives among healthcare professionals. This study aims to compare the knowledge and positions of hospital pharmacists (HP) and cardiologists (CA) regarding the use of reprocessed single-use devices (R-SUDs), in order to identify their concerns as well as points of convergence and divergence. A directive and mixed electronic questionnaire consisting of 27 questions was sent to HPs and CAs from the Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP). Responses from 32 HPs and 30 CAs were analyzed using statistical methods via R software. The results revealed that CAs overwhelmingly support reprocessing, while HPs show significantly more reservations (P<0.0001). Among HPs, 56% (n=18) favored an "open" supply chain model for reprocessing, compared to 28% (n=9) who preferred a "closed" one. CAs show a more balanced distribution of their preferences, with 30% (n=9) favoring the "open" chain and 40% (n=12) the "closed" model. Both groups raised concerns about the safety and quality of reprocessed devices, but the majority would accept R-SUDs if clinical trials validated their safety and effectiveness compared to original SUDs. Reprocessing is nevertheless seen as a means to reduce hospital costs and carbon footprint in hospitals.

[一次性医疗器械的再处理:心脏病专家和医院药剂师的观点和看法]。
预计将于2024年11月在法国启动一项关于医疗设备(MD)后处理的试点倡议,特别是在电生理学方面。对一次性医疗设备(sud)进行再处理带来了潜在的好处和挑战,在医疗保健专业人员中有不同的观点。本研究旨在比较医院药剂师(HP)和心脏病专家(CA)在使用再加工一次性器械(r - sud)方面的知识和立场,以确定他们的关注点以及趋同点和分歧点。巴黎援助Publique-Hôpitaux (AP-HP)向hp和ca发送了一份包含27个问题的指示和混合电子调查表。通过R软件对32名hp和30名ca的反应进行统计分析。结果显示,ca压倒性地支持再处理,而hp则显示出更多的保留意见(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annales pharmaceutiques francaises
Annales pharmaceutiques francaises PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: This journal proposes a scientific information validated and indexed to be informed about the last research works in all the domains interesting the pharmacy. The original works, general reviews, the focusing, the brief notes, subjected by the best academics and the professionals, propose a synthetic approach of the last progress accomplished in the concerned sectors. The thematic Sessions and the – life of the Academy – resume the communications which, presented in front of the national Academy of pharmacy, are in the heart of the current events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信