Home-based physical symptom management for family caregivers: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Daniel Eric Schoth, Simone Holley, Margaret Johnson, Emma Stibbs, Kate Renton, Emily Harrop, Christina Liossi
{"title":"Home-based physical symptom management for family caregivers: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Daniel Eric Schoth, Simone Holley, Margaret Johnson, Emma Stibbs, Kate Renton, Emily Harrop, Christina Liossi","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with life-limiting conditions are often cared for at home by family, typically without adequate training to carry out the challenging tasks performed. This systematic review assessed the efficacy of interventions designed to help family caregivers manage pain and other symptoms in adults and children with life-limiting conditions at home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed on seven databases. A narrative synthesis was conducted, along with a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in those who received an intervention to those who did not, or to preintervention scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>84 eligible studies were identified. Significant improvements in pain and fatigue in patients with cancer were found compared with patients in the control group and baseline. Caregivers of patients with cancer receiving an intervention, compared with the control group caregivers, showed significant improvements in self-efficacy and active coping and lower avoidant coping. This group also showed significant improvements in burden, self-efficacy, anxiety and depression, and decreases in avoidant coping pre- to post intervention. Patients with dementia whose caregivers received an intervention showed significantly reduced pain intensity and improvements in quality of life pre- to post intervention. Caregivers of patients with dementia showed significantly reduced distress pre- to post intervention. No beneficial effects were found for caregivers of patients with Parkinson's disease or heart failure, although only limited analyses could be performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions targeting family caregivers can improve both patient symptoms and caregiver outcomes, as demonstrated in cancer and dementia care. Future mixed-methods research should collect data from caregiver and patient dyads, identifying key intervention components. There is also need for more studies on caregivers of paediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with life-limiting conditions are often cared for at home by family, typically without adequate training to carry out the challenging tasks performed. This systematic review assessed the efficacy of interventions designed to help family caregivers manage pain and other symptoms in adults and children with life-limiting conditions at home.

Methods: A systematic search was performed on seven databases. A narrative synthesis was conducted, along with a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in those who received an intervention to those who did not, or to preintervention scores.

Results: 84 eligible studies were identified. Significant improvements in pain and fatigue in patients with cancer were found compared with patients in the control group and baseline. Caregivers of patients with cancer receiving an intervention, compared with the control group caregivers, showed significant improvements in self-efficacy and active coping and lower avoidant coping. This group also showed significant improvements in burden, self-efficacy, anxiety and depression, and decreases in avoidant coping pre- to post intervention. Patients with dementia whose caregivers received an intervention showed significantly reduced pain intensity and improvements in quality of life pre- to post intervention. Caregivers of patients with dementia showed significantly reduced distress pre- to post intervention. No beneficial effects were found for caregivers of patients with Parkinson's disease or heart failure, although only limited analyses could be performed.

Conclusions: Interventions targeting family caregivers can improve both patient symptoms and caregiver outcomes, as demonstrated in cancer and dementia care. Future mixed-methods research should collect data from caregiver and patient dyads, identifying key intervention components. There is also need for more studies on caregivers of paediatric patients.

以家庭照顾者为基础的身体症状管理:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:患有生命限制疾病的患者通常由家人在家照顾,通常没有足够的训练来执行具有挑战性的任务。本系统综述评估了旨在帮助家庭照护者管理家中有生命限制条件的成人和儿童的疼痛和其他症状的干预措施的有效性。方法:对7个数据库进行系统检索。进行了叙事综合,并进行了荟萃分析,比较了接受干预的人与未接受干预的人的结果,或干预前的得分。结果:84项符合条件的研究被确定。与对照组和基线患者相比,癌症患者的疼痛和疲劳得到了显著改善。与对照组护理人员相比,接受干预的癌症患者护理人员在自我效能、积极应对和低回避应对方面均有显著改善。干预前后,本组在负担、自我效能、焦虑和抑郁方面均有显著改善,回避性应对有所减少。护理人员接受干预的痴呆患者在干预前后疼痛强度显著降低,生活质量显著改善。痴呆患者的护理人员在干预前后表现出明显减少的痛苦。尽管只能进行有限的分析,但没有发现对帕金森病或心力衰竭患者的护理人员有有益的影响。结论:针对家庭照顾者的干预措施可以改善患者的症状和照顾者的结果,正如癌症和痴呆护理所证明的那样。未来的混合方法研究应该收集护理者和患者的数据,确定关键的干预成分。还需要对儿科患者的护理人员进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信