Treatment options for preventing autoimmune-mediated congenital heart block: a systematic review.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Abhishek Agarwal, Nikolaos Skoutelis, Yufeng Zhou, Reina Kawanami, Amandine Charras, Felice Occhigrossi, Umber Agarwal, Sophia Khan, Sarah Donegan, Daniel Hawcutt
{"title":"Treatment options for preventing autoimmune-mediated congenital heart block: a systematic review.","authors":"Abhishek Agarwal, Nikolaos Skoutelis, Yufeng Zhou, Reina Kawanami, Amandine Charras, Felice Occhigrossi, Umber Agarwal, Sophia Khan, Sarah Donegan, Daniel Hawcutt","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Complete congenital heart block (CHB) due to anti-Ro/La antibodies in pregnancy can lead to adverse fetal outcomes and neonatal death. National and international guidelines do not recommend specific treatment for women identified with anti-Ro antibodies while pregnant.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review of studies of pregnant women with anti-Ro/La antibodies undertaking treatment(s) to prevent CHB. Studies solely focused on treating developing or established CHB were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>CHB incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1049 articles, 20 studies were eligible, of which 13 were retrospective. Sixteen studies contained usable data comparing various treatments (seven hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), six corticosteroids, two intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and one each on combined HCQ and corticosteroids and plasmapheresis), including 2134 women and 2915 pregnancies. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity. HCQ as primary prophylaxis showed protective effect on CHB incidence in four of five studies, whereas for preventing recurrence, only one study had a comparator arm, which showed a protective effect. Corticosteroids showed protective effect on CHB incidence as primary prophylaxis in two of three studies, whereas in recurrence, only one study showed protective effect. The IVIG study with a comparator showed no protective effect on CHB recurrence. Two studies (IVIG and plasmapheresis) had no comparator. The long-term toxicity of treatments was poorly investigated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HCQ showed the most evidence among various treatment options to prevent CHB in babies of women with anti-Ro/La antibodies. However, included studies had high risk of bias and imprecision. Future studies should be prospective, compare existing treatments and capture adverse effects.PROSPERO registration number CRD42023492934.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Complete congenital heart block (CHB) due to anti-Ro/La antibodies in pregnancy can lead to adverse fetal outcomes and neonatal death. National and international guidelines do not recommend specific treatment for women identified with anti-Ro antibodies while pregnant.

Design: Systematic review of studies of pregnant women with anti-Ro/La antibodies undertaking treatment(s) to prevent CHB. Studies solely focused on treating developing or established CHB were excluded.

Main outcome measure: CHB incidence.

Results: Of 1049 articles, 20 studies were eligible, of which 13 were retrospective. Sixteen studies contained usable data comparing various treatments (seven hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), six corticosteroids, two intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and one each on combined HCQ and corticosteroids and plasmapheresis), including 2134 women and 2915 pregnancies. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity. HCQ as primary prophylaxis showed protective effect on CHB incidence in four of five studies, whereas for preventing recurrence, only one study had a comparator arm, which showed a protective effect. Corticosteroids showed protective effect on CHB incidence as primary prophylaxis in two of three studies, whereas in recurrence, only one study showed protective effect. The IVIG study with a comparator showed no protective effect on CHB recurrence. Two studies (IVIG and plasmapheresis) had no comparator. The long-term toxicity of treatments was poorly investigated.

Conclusion: HCQ showed the most evidence among various treatment options to prevent CHB in babies of women with anti-Ro/La antibodies. However, included studies had high risk of bias and imprecision. Future studies should be prospective, compare existing treatments and capture adverse effects.PROSPERO registration number CRD42023492934.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信