Joachim Drevs, Mandeep Singh Malhotra, Huseyin Sahinbas, Aggelos Iliopoulos, George Beis, Panagiotis Apostolou, Ioannis Papasotiriou
{"title":"Adjusting Treatment Strategies Using Circulating Tumor Cells: Preliminary Results on Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Joachim Drevs, Mandeep Singh Malhotra, Huseyin Sahinbas, Aggelos Iliopoulos, George Beis, Panagiotis Apostolou, Ioannis Papasotiriou","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in proposing second-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We analyzed CTCs from 21 patients (first group) with mCRC, for whom first-line treatment regimens were ineffective. CTCs were isolated and used for chemo-sensitivity/viability assays on several chemotherapeutic drugs. Based on these assays, a second-line treatment was recommended for each patient. Using overall survival (OS) as primary endpoint, statistical analysis was performed, comparing the survival of a group of 21 mCRC patients (first group) with the survival of 12 mCRC patients treated only with best supportive care (BSC) (second group), as well as with the survival estimated by meta-analysis of the BSC summary statistics (medians) published in various papers and clinical trials. Furthermore, the statistical significance of the difference between the two groups was examined by applying statistical tests that can deal efficiently with small datasets, non-proportional hazard patterns, and crossing curves, such as K-sample omnibus, MaxCombo, multiple-direction, and weighted log-rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median OS (mOS) for the first group (9 months) was found longer than the mOS of the BSC group (about 5 months). This result was further verified since the weighted mOS, estimated by meta-analysis, was found at 5.15 months. This difference was found statistically significant for central and late hazards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The preliminary results indicate that treatment based on CTCs' response in vitro prolongs mOS of mCRC patients compared with BSC patients, whereas a beneficial effect is gained for the prediction of treatment response in mCRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"45 2","pages":"491-502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aim: To assess the effectiveness of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in proposing second-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Patients and methods: We analyzed CTCs from 21 patients (first group) with mCRC, for whom first-line treatment regimens were ineffective. CTCs were isolated and used for chemo-sensitivity/viability assays on several chemotherapeutic drugs. Based on these assays, a second-line treatment was recommended for each patient. Using overall survival (OS) as primary endpoint, statistical analysis was performed, comparing the survival of a group of 21 mCRC patients (first group) with the survival of 12 mCRC patients treated only with best supportive care (BSC) (second group), as well as with the survival estimated by meta-analysis of the BSC summary statistics (medians) published in various papers and clinical trials. Furthermore, the statistical significance of the difference between the two groups was examined by applying statistical tests that can deal efficiently with small datasets, non-proportional hazard patterns, and crossing curves, such as K-sample omnibus, MaxCombo, multiple-direction, and weighted log-rank tests.
Results: The median OS (mOS) for the first group (9 months) was found longer than the mOS of the BSC group (about 5 months). This result was further verified since the weighted mOS, estimated by meta-analysis, was found at 5.15 months. This difference was found statistically significant for central and late hazards.
Conclusion: The preliminary results indicate that treatment based on CTCs' response in vitro prolongs mOS of mCRC patients compared with BSC patients, whereas a beneficial effect is gained for the prediction of treatment response in mCRC.
期刊介绍:
ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed.
ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies).
Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.