Adjusting Treatment Strategies Using Circulating Tumor Cells: Preliminary Results on Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Joachim Drevs, Mandeep Singh Malhotra, Huseyin Sahinbas, Aggelos Iliopoulos, George Beis, Panagiotis Apostolou, Ioannis Papasotiriou
{"title":"Adjusting Treatment Strategies Using Circulating Tumor Cells: Preliminary Results on Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Joachim Drevs, Mandeep Singh Malhotra, Huseyin Sahinbas, Aggelos Iliopoulos, George Beis, Panagiotis Apostolou, Ioannis Papasotiriou","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in proposing second-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We analyzed CTCs from 21 patients (first group) with mCRC, for whom first-line treatment regimens were ineffective. CTCs were isolated and used for chemo-sensitivity/viability assays on several chemotherapeutic drugs. Based on these assays, a second-line treatment was recommended for each patient. Using overall survival (OS) as primary endpoint, statistical analysis was performed, comparing the survival of a group of 21 mCRC patients (first group) with the survival of 12 mCRC patients treated only with best supportive care (BSC) (second group), as well as with the survival estimated by meta-analysis of the BSC summary statistics (medians) published in various papers and clinical trials. Furthermore, the statistical significance of the difference between the two groups was examined by applying statistical tests that can deal efficiently with small datasets, non-proportional hazard patterns, and crossing curves, such as K-sample omnibus, MaxCombo, multiple-direction, and weighted log-rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median OS (mOS) for the first group (9 months) was found longer than the mOS of the BSC group (about 5 months). This result was further verified since the weighted mOS, estimated by meta-analysis, was found at 5.15 months. This difference was found statistically significant for central and late hazards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The preliminary results indicate that treatment based on CTCs' response in vitro prolongs mOS of mCRC patients compared with BSC patients, whereas a beneficial effect is gained for the prediction of treatment response in mCRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"45 2","pages":"491-502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: To assess the effectiveness of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in proposing second-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Patients and methods: We analyzed CTCs from 21 patients (first group) with mCRC, for whom first-line treatment regimens were ineffective. CTCs were isolated and used for chemo-sensitivity/viability assays on several chemotherapeutic drugs. Based on these assays, a second-line treatment was recommended for each patient. Using overall survival (OS) as primary endpoint, statistical analysis was performed, comparing the survival of a group of 21 mCRC patients (first group) with the survival of 12 mCRC patients treated only with best supportive care (BSC) (second group), as well as with the survival estimated by meta-analysis of the BSC summary statistics (medians) published in various papers and clinical trials. Furthermore, the statistical significance of the difference between the two groups was examined by applying statistical tests that can deal efficiently with small datasets, non-proportional hazard patterns, and crossing curves, such as K-sample omnibus, MaxCombo, multiple-direction, and weighted log-rank tests.

Results: The median OS (mOS) for the first group (9 months) was found longer than the mOS of the BSC group (about 5 months). This result was further verified since the weighted mOS, estimated by meta-analysis, was found at 5.15 months. This difference was found statistically significant for central and late hazards.

Conclusion: The preliminary results indicate that treatment based on CTCs' response in vitro prolongs mOS of mCRC patients compared with BSC patients, whereas a beneficial effect is gained for the prediction of treatment response in mCRC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anticancer research
Anticancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed. ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies). Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信