Assessing impact of a community-based screening campaign to address social determinants of cervical cancer.

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Justine Po, Arthur Bookstein, Woori Lee, Rosa Barahona, Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati
{"title":"Assessing impact of a community-based screening campaign to address social determinants of cervical cancer.","authors":"Justine Po, Arthur Bookstein, Woori Lee, Rosa Barahona, Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Screening represents a cornerstone of cervical cancer control strategy. However, disparities in social determinants of health have perpetuated gaps in screening among racial and ethnic minorities. Social determinants of health including cultural stigma and lack of insurance have contributed to decreased screening among Hispanic women. To increase cancer screening in this population, community-academic partnerships and culturally tailored media have emerged as promising strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed the impact of a culturally tailored cervical cancer screening campaign implemented through academic-community-government partnerships. Intercept surveys, conducted from 2015 to 2018 in eastern neighborhoods of Los Angeles, assessed campaign recall, interpretation, and screening intention among Hispanic women aged 21-65 years after exposure to the campaign. Screening intention was evaluated using χ2 and logistic regression by participant characteristics, with thematic analysis for campaign interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 673 participants, 26.1% were uninsured, and 85.9% primarily spoke Spanish at home. Campaign recall was 25.1%, with 64.5% interpreting the campaign's message as cervical cancer screening or health checkups. The campaign's most liked aspect was emphasis on family (cited by 37.1% of participants). Postcampaign, 89.5% of participants overall were likely or extremely likely to schedule a Pap test, including 83.5% of women who had not had a Pap test in the past 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore several important strategies to reduce cervical cancer disparities: (1) associating positive cultural values with screening to decrease stigma, (2) combining culturally tailored outreach with interventions that target other known screening barriers, (3) facilitating long-term community relationships, and (4) leveraging academic-community-government partnerships.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Screening represents a cornerstone of cervical cancer control strategy. However, disparities in social determinants of health have perpetuated gaps in screening among racial and ethnic minorities. Social determinants of health including cultural stigma and lack of insurance have contributed to decreased screening among Hispanic women. To increase cancer screening in this population, community-academic partnerships and culturally tailored media have emerged as promising strategies.

Methods: This study assessed the impact of a culturally tailored cervical cancer screening campaign implemented through academic-community-government partnerships. Intercept surveys, conducted from 2015 to 2018 in eastern neighborhoods of Los Angeles, assessed campaign recall, interpretation, and screening intention among Hispanic women aged 21-65 years after exposure to the campaign. Screening intention was evaluated using χ2 and logistic regression by participant characteristics, with thematic analysis for campaign interpretation.

Results: Of 673 participants, 26.1% were uninsured, and 85.9% primarily spoke Spanish at home. Campaign recall was 25.1%, with 64.5% interpreting the campaign's message as cervical cancer screening or health checkups. The campaign's most liked aspect was emphasis on family (cited by 37.1% of participants). Postcampaign, 89.5% of participants overall were likely or extremely likely to schedule a Pap test, including 83.5% of women who had not had a Pap test in the past 3 years.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore several important strategies to reduce cervical cancer disparities: (1) associating positive cultural values with screening to decrease stigma, (2) combining culturally tailored outreach with interventions that target other known screening barriers, (3) facilitating long-term community relationships, and (4) leveraging academic-community-government partnerships.

评估以社区为基础的筛检运动对解决子宫颈癌的社会决定因素的影响。
背景:筛检是子宫颈癌控制策略的基石。然而,健康的社会决定因素(SoDoH)方面的差异使种族/少数民族筛查方面的差距长期存在。包括文化耻辱和缺乏保险在内的SoDoH导致西班牙裔妇女的筛查减少。为了增加这一人群的癌症筛查,社区学术合作伙伴关系和文化量身定制的媒体已经成为有希望的策略。方法:本研究评估了通过学术-社区-政府合作伙伴关系实施的文化定制宫颈癌筛查活动的影响。从2015年到2018年,在洛杉矶东部社区进行了拦截调查,评估了21-65岁的西班牙裔女性在接触该活动后的活动回忆、解释和筛查意愿。筛选意向通过卡方检验和参与者特征的逻辑回归进行评估,并通过主题分析进行活动解释。结果:在673名参与者中,26.1%的人没有保险,85.9%的人在家主要说西班牙语。运动的回忆率为25.1%,其中64.5%将运动的信息解释为宫颈癌筛查或健康检查。该活动最受欢迎的方面是对家庭的重视(37.1%的参与者提到了这一点)。在竞选结束后,89.5%的参与者很可能或极有可能安排一次巴氏试验,其中83.5%的女性在过去三年中没有做过巴氏试验。结论:我们的研究结果强调了减少宫颈癌差异的几个重要策略:1)将积极的文化价值观与筛查联系起来,以减少耻辱感;2)将文化定制的外展与针对其他已知筛查障碍的干预措施相结合;3)促进长期社区关系;4)利用学术-社区-政府伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信