[Agitation in people with dementia : Scoping review and putting the phenomenon into perspective using the comfort theory and the concept of attachment].

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING
Recherche en soins infirmiers Pub Date : 2016-06-01
Corinne Schaub, Diane Morin, Armin von Gunten
{"title":"[Agitation in people with dementia : Scoping review and putting the phenomenon into perspective using the comfort theory and the concept of attachment].","authors":"Corinne Schaub, Diane Morin, Armin von Gunten","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agitation in hospitalized demented patients is troublesome and disruptive for both patients and caregivers. The literature indicates that agitation is strongly related to physical or psychological discomfort and its recent definition includes the additional relation to emotional distress. Hospitalization associated with major cognitive difficulties further activates the need for attachment and security to which caregivers must pay attention. This synthesis review first deals with the evidence related to agitation in people with dementia and its relationship with discomfort. A description of the difficulties with which caregivers must cope follows. The need to primarily use nonpharmacological approaches during agitation to meet the underlying needs causing discomfort is then developed. Recommended approaches generally involve a relational contact, even if facing the risk of mobilizing frequently unsecured and anxious attachment patterns in this population. A conceptual positioning supported by the Kolcaba comfort theory will position this knowledge. A particular point of this theory, based on previous experiences of patients, will be analyzed based on attachment characteristics of people with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94187,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en soins infirmiers","volume":" 125","pages":"68-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en soins infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agitation in hospitalized demented patients is troublesome and disruptive for both patients and caregivers. The literature indicates that agitation is strongly related to physical or psychological discomfort and its recent definition includes the additional relation to emotional distress. Hospitalization associated with major cognitive difficulties further activates the need for attachment and security to which caregivers must pay attention. This synthesis review first deals with the evidence related to agitation in people with dementia and its relationship with discomfort. A description of the difficulties with which caregivers must cope follows. The need to primarily use nonpharmacological approaches during agitation to meet the underlying needs causing discomfort is then developed. Recommended approaches generally involve a relational contact, even if facing the risk of mobilizing frequently unsecured and anxious attachment patterns in this population. A conceptual positioning supported by the Kolcaba comfort theory will position this knowledge. A particular point of this theory, based on previous experiences of patients, will be analyzed based on attachment characteristics of people with dementia.

[痴呆症患者的躁动:使用舒适理论和依恋概念对这一现象进行范围审查和透视]。
住院痴呆患者的躁动对患者和护理人员来说都是麻烦和破坏性的。文献表明,躁动与身体或心理不适密切相关,其最近的定义包括与情绪困扰的额外关系。与重大认知困难相关的住院治疗进一步激活了对依恋和安全的需求,护理人员必须注意这一点。这篇综合综述首先处理与痴呆患者的躁动及其与不适的关系有关的证据。以下是对护理人员必须应付的困难的描述。在躁动期间,需要主要使用非药物方法来满足引起不适的潜在需求。建议的方法通常涉及关系接触,即使面临着在这一人群中频繁调动不安全和焦虑的依恋模式的风险。由Kolcaba舒适理论支持的概念定位将对这一知识进行定位。这一理论的一个特定点,基于患者以往的经验,将根据痴呆症患者的依恋特征进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信