The Diagnostic Utility of Host RNA Biosignatures in Adult Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001212
Mervin V Loi, Rehena Sultana, Tuong Minh Nguyen, Shi Ting Tia, Jan Hau Lee, Daniel O'Connor
{"title":"The Diagnostic Utility of Host RNA Biosignatures in Adult Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mervin V Loi, Rehena Sultana, Tuong Minh Nguyen, Shi Ting Tia, Jan Hau Lee, Daniel O'Connor","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency, with a profound healthcare burden globally. Its pathophysiology is complex, heterogeneous and temporally dynamic, making diagnosis challenging. Medical management is predicated on early diagnosis and timely intervention. Transcriptomics is one of the novel \"-omics\" technologies being evaluated for recognition of sepsis. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of host gene expression biosignatures for the diagnosis of all-cause sepsis in adults.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed/Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to June 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included studies evaluating the performance of host gene expression biosignatures in adults who were diagnosed with sepsis using existing clinical definitions. Controls where applicable were patients without clinical sepsis.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data including population demographics, sample size, study design, tissue specimen, type of transcriptome, health status of comparator group, and performance of transcriptomic biomarkers were independently extracted by at least two reviewers.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Meta-analysis to describe the performance of host gene expression biosignatures for the diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A total of 117 studies (n = 17,469), comprising 132 separate patient datasets, were included in our final analysis. Performance of transcriptomics for the diagnosis of sepsis against pooled controls showed area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.88). Studies using healthy controls showed AUC 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.89), while studies using controls with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) had AUC 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90). Transcripts with excellent discrimination against SIRS controls include UrSepsisModel, a 210 differentially expressed genes biosignature, microRNA-143, and Septicyte laboratory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transcriptomics is a promising approach for the accurate diagnosis of sepsis in adults and demonstrates good discriminatory ability against both healthy and SIRS control subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 2","pages":"e1212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency, with a profound healthcare burden globally. Its pathophysiology is complex, heterogeneous and temporally dynamic, making diagnosis challenging. Medical management is predicated on early diagnosis and timely intervention. Transcriptomics is one of the novel "-omics" technologies being evaluated for recognition of sepsis. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of host gene expression biosignatures for the diagnosis of all-cause sepsis in adults.

Data sources: PubMed/Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to June 2023.

Study selection: We included studies evaluating the performance of host gene expression biosignatures in adults who were diagnosed with sepsis using existing clinical definitions. Controls where applicable were patients without clinical sepsis.

Data extraction: Data including population demographics, sample size, study design, tissue specimen, type of transcriptome, health status of comparator group, and performance of transcriptomic biomarkers were independently extracted by at least two reviewers.

Data synthesis: Meta-analysis to describe the performance of host gene expression biosignatures for the diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A total of 117 studies (n = 17,469), comprising 132 separate patient datasets, were included in our final analysis. Performance of transcriptomics for the diagnosis of sepsis against pooled controls showed area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.88). Studies using healthy controls showed AUC 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.89), while studies using controls with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) had AUC 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90). Transcripts with excellent discrimination against SIRS controls include UrSepsisModel, a 210 differentially expressed genes biosignature, microRNA-143, and Septicyte laboratory.

Conclusions: Transcriptomics is a promising approach for the accurate diagnosis of sepsis in adults and demonstrates good discriminatory ability against both healthy and SIRS control subjects.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信