Psychometric evaluation of the psychosis screening questionnaire in South Africa with attention to overlap between symptoms and normative cultural beliefs.

Melissa A Stockton, Annika C Sweetland, Ernesha Webb Mazinyo, Kwanda Nogemane, Nondumiso Ngcelwane, Cale Basaraba, Charl Bezuidenhout, Griffin Sansbury, Christoffel Grobler, Melanie M Wall, Andrew Medina-Marino, Phumza Nobatyi, Milton L Wainberg
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the psychosis screening questionnaire in South Africa with attention to overlap between symptoms and normative cultural beliefs.","authors":"Melissa A Stockton, Annika C Sweetland, Ernesha Webb Mazinyo, Kwanda Nogemane, Nondumiso Ngcelwane, Cale Basaraba, Charl Bezuidenhout, Griffin Sansbury, Christoffel Grobler, Melanie M Wall, Andrew Medina-Marino, Phumza Nobatyi, Milton L Wainberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated the 5-item Psychosis Screening Questionnaire (PSQ) against a diagnostic gold standard in South Africa. 1885 adults at primary and tertiary health facilities were screened with the PSQ and diagnosed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-V. Minor adaptations were required of both instruments to distinguish between psychiatric symptoms and normative cultural beliefs. We assessed internal consistency, criterion validity and sensitivities and specificities for identifying current or lifetime hypomanic or manic episode and/or psychotic disorders. The PSQ only yielded acceptable criterion validity for lifetime hypomanic or manic episode. A positive PSQ screen yielded sensitivities of 74.36%, 55.00%, and 64.68% for lifetime hypomanic or manic episode, psychotic disorder, and any SMD, respectively. Given the overlap between symptoms and normative cultural beliefs, preemptive framing was required to improve the cultural understanding and relevance. With these adaptations, the translated PSQ functioned adequately for hypomanic or manic episode, but not for psychotic disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":90997,"journal":{"name":"World cultural psychiatry research review : official journal of World Association of Cultural Psychiatry","volume":"18 1","pages":"13-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World cultural psychiatry research review : official journal of World Association of Cultural Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluated the 5-item Psychosis Screening Questionnaire (PSQ) against a diagnostic gold standard in South Africa. 1885 adults at primary and tertiary health facilities were screened with the PSQ and diagnosed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-V. Minor adaptations were required of both instruments to distinguish between psychiatric symptoms and normative cultural beliefs. We assessed internal consistency, criterion validity and sensitivities and specificities for identifying current or lifetime hypomanic or manic episode and/or psychotic disorders. The PSQ only yielded acceptable criterion validity for lifetime hypomanic or manic episode. A positive PSQ screen yielded sensitivities of 74.36%, 55.00%, and 64.68% for lifetime hypomanic or manic episode, psychotic disorder, and any SMD, respectively. Given the overlap between symptoms and normative cultural beliefs, preemptive framing was required to improve the cultural understanding and relevance. With these adaptations, the translated PSQ functioned adequately for hypomanic or manic episode, but not for psychotic disorder.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信