A risk prediction model for adult patients with difficult intravenous access.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Yijun Ji, Chang Liu, Xiuzhu Cao, Linfang Zhao
{"title":"A risk prediction model for adult patients with difficult intravenous access.","authors":"Yijun Ji, Chang Liu, Xiuzhu Cao, Linfang Zhao","doi":"10.1177/11297298251314909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The challenges posed by difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in clinical treatment are not only related to technical difficulties but also have the potential to affect the quality of patient care and overall experience. It is crucial to adopt effective strategies to address difficult intravenous access. Currently, the assessment of difficult veins largely relies on individual perception and experience, which introduces a significant degree of subjectivity.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and validate a risk prediction model for DIVA in adult patients, providing a tool for early identification and intervention.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data collection was conducted on 1170 hospitalized patients who required the placement of a short peripheral venous catheter for treatment in a tertiary hospital from June 1, 2022, to September 30, 2022, as the training set. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors influencing DIVA in adult patients and to construct a risk prediction model. Prospective data collection was conducted on 300 hospitalized patients from June 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023, for external validation. The discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and clinical decision curve, respectively. A TRIPOD checklist was used to guide the reporting of this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of patients in the training set was 58.60 ± 15.39 years. Among them, 626 were males (53.50%) and 544 were females (46.50%). The external validation group included a total of 300 patients with a mean age of 58.77 ± 15.26 years. There were 142 males (47.33%) and 158 females (52.67%). Advanced age, female sex, extreme weight (BMI <18.5 or >30), history of hemodialysis, axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer, compromised skin integrity, history of DIVA, and target cannula size ⩽20G are independent predictive factors for DIVA in adult patients (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The risk prediction model constructed based on these factors had an area under the ROC curve of 0.912 (95% CI 0.880-0.943) in the modeling group. The areas under the ROC curve in the internal and external validation groups were 0.887 (95% CI 0.855-0.924) and 0.870 (95% CI 0.799-0.942), respectively. Calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that intervening when the risk of venous puncture difficulty ranged from 3% to 91% yielded favorable clinical benefits for patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Constructing a risk prediction model for DIVA in adult patients has significant predictive value. It assists medical staff in early intervention and management for high-risk patients, thereby achieving effective prediction, warning, and control.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251314909"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251314909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The challenges posed by difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in clinical treatment are not only related to technical difficulties but also have the potential to affect the quality of patient care and overall experience. It is crucial to adopt effective strategies to address difficult intravenous access. Currently, the assessment of difficult veins largely relies on individual perception and experience, which introduces a significant degree of subjectivity.

Aim: To develop and validate a risk prediction model for DIVA in adult patients, providing a tool for early identification and intervention.

Design: An observational study.

Methods: Retrospective data collection was conducted on 1170 hospitalized patients who required the placement of a short peripheral venous catheter for treatment in a tertiary hospital from June 1, 2022, to September 30, 2022, as the training set. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors influencing DIVA in adult patients and to construct a risk prediction model. Prospective data collection was conducted on 300 hospitalized patients from June 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023, for external validation. The discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and clinical decision curve, respectively. A TRIPOD checklist was used to guide the reporting of this study.

Results: The average age of patients in the training set was 58.60 ± 15.39 years. Among them, 626 were males (53.50%) and 544 were females (46.50%). The external validation group included a total of 300 patients with a mean age of 58.77 ± 15.26 years. There were 142 males (47.33%) and 158 females (52.67%). Advanced age, female sex, extreme weight (BMI <18.5 or >30), history of hemodialysis, axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer, compromised skin integrity, history of DIVA, and target cannula size ⩽20G are independent predictive factors for DIVA in adult patients (all p < 0.05). The risk prediction model constructed based on these factors had an area under the ROC curve of 0.912 (95% CI 0.880-0.943) in the modeling group. The areas under the ROC curve in the internal and external validation groups were 0.887 (95% CI 0.855-0.924) and 0.870 (95% CI 0.799-0.942), respectively. Calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that intervening when the risk of venous puncture difficulty ranged from 3% to 91% yielded favorable clinical benefits for patients.

Conclusion: Constructing a risk prediction model for DIVA in adult patients has significant predictive value. It assists medical staff in early intervention and management for high-risk patients, thereby achieving effective prediction, warning, and control.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信