Feasibility of implementing a rapid-learning methodology to inform radiotherapy treatments: key professional stakeholders' views.

BMJ oncology Pub Date : 2024-03-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000226
Arbaz Kapadi, Gareth Price, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Rebecca Holley, Kate Wicks, Kathryn Banfill, Gareth Webster, Kevin Franks, Fiona McDonald, Daniel Johnson, David P French
{"title":"Feasibility of implementing a rapid-learning methodology to inform radiotherapy treatments: key professional stakeholders' views.","authors":"Arbaz Kapadi, Gareth Price, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Rebecca Holley, Kate Wicks, Kathryn Banfill, Gareth Webster, Kevin Franks, Fiona McDonald, Daniel Johnson, David P French","doi":"10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pragmatic methodologies, often termed rapid-learning, are being pursued that can match the pace of innovation in radiotherapy and generate evidence from the real-world treatment setting. It is important to understand the feasibility of implementing such pragmatic approaches before their application in practice. This study investigated key professional stakeholders' perceptions and opinions of rapid-learning and real-world data (RWD).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Twenty-three interviews were conducted with key professional stakeholders based across five UK radiotherapy cancer centres. Centres varied in size and reflected different healthcare environments. Data were collected between December 2022 and May 2023, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were generated: (1) the alignment of rapid-learning methodologies with the reality of practice, (2) concerns related to the variability of RWD, (3) the maturity of data infrastructures and capacity for rapid-learning and (4) further support, education and evidence needed to convince stakeholders to adopt rapid-learning approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The potential of rapid-learning to help address evidence gaps in radiotherapy development was positively received by different professional stakeholders. However, the effectiveness of rapid-learning was viewed as being highly dependent on the collection of quality data in the routine setting, while the variable set-up at different cancer centres is also likely to be a key challenge for potential implementation. Developing data infrastructures to improve data interoperability was considered crucial for rapid-learning implementation, along with method clarity, educational support and training for radiotherapy teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":72436,"journal":{"name":"BMJ oncology","volume":"3 1","pages":"e000226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11235030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pragmatic methodologies, often termed rapid-learning, are being pursued that can match the pace of innovation in radiotherapy and generate evidence from the real-world treatment setting. It is important to understand the feasibility of implementing such pragmatic approaches before their application in practice. This study investigated key professional stakeholders' perceptions and opinions of rapid-learning and real-world data (RWD).

Methods and analysis: Twenty-three interviews were conducted with key professional stakeholders based across five UK radiotherapy cancer centres. Centres varied in size and reflected different healthcare environments. Data were collected between December 2022 and May 2023, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Four themes were generated: (1) the alignment of rapid-learning methodologies with the reality of practice, (2) concerns related to the variability of RWD, (3) the maturity of data infrastructures and capacity for rapid-learning and (4) further support, education and evidence needed to convince stakeholders to adopt rapid-learning approaches.

Conclusion: The potential of rapid-learning to help address evidence gaps in radiotherapy development was positively received by different professional stakeholders. However, the effectiveness of rapid-learning was viewed as being highly dependent on the collection of quality data in the routine setting, while the variable set-up at different cancer centres is also likely to be a key challenge for potential implementation. Developing data infrastructures to improve data interoperability was considered crucial for rapid-learning implementation, along with method clarity, educational support and training for radiotherapy teams.

实施快速学习方法为放射治疗提供信息的可行性:主要专业利益相关者的意见。
目的:实用的方法,通常被称为快速学习,正在追求能够匹配放射治疗创新的步伐,并从现实世界的治疗环境中产生证据。在实践中应用这些务实方法之前,了解实施这些方法的可行性是很重要的。本研究调查了主要专业利益相关者对快速学习和真实世界数据(RWD)的看法和意见。方法和分析:对英国五个放疗癌症中心的关键专业利益相关者进行了23次访谈。中心的规模各不相同,反映了不同的医疗保健环境。数据收集于2022年12月至2023年5月之间,并使用归纳主题分析进行分析。结果:产生了四个主题:(1)快速学习方法与实践现实的一致性;(2)与RWD变异性相关的问题;(3)数据基础设施和快速学习能力的成熟度;(4)说服利益相关者采用快速学习方法所需的进一步支持、教育和证据。结论:不同的专业利益相关者积极接受快速学习的潜力,以帮助解决放射治疗发展中的证据差距。然而,快速学习的有效性被认为高度依赖于常规设置中收集的高质量数据,而不同癌症中心的可变设置也可能是潜在实施的关键挑战。发展数据基础设施以改善数据互操作性被认为对快速学习实施至关重要,同时对方法的明确性、教育支持和放射治疗小组的培训也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信