Midterm to Long-term Follow-up After Limited Saucerization of a Discoid Lateral Meniscus: Radiological and Functional Outcomes With Age-Dependent Variations.
Taha Aksoy, Ibrahim Mehmet Goymen, Gazi Huri, Egemen Turhan, Mininder S Kocher, Ozgur Ahmet Atay
{"title":"Midterm to Long-term Follow-up After Limited Saucerization of a Discoid Lateral Meniscus: Radiological and Functional Outcomes With Age-Dependent Variations.","authors":"Taha Aksoy, Ibrahim Mehmet Goymen, Gazi Huri, Egemen Turhan, Mininder S Kocher, Ozgur Ahmet Atay","doi":"10.1177/03635465241313137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is the most common meniscus variant and is commonly treated with arthroscopic saucerization. There are mixed data regarding long-term results after surgery, especially in terms of radiological parameters.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the functional and radiological results of patients who underwent arthroscopic saucerization for a symptomatic DLM. It was hypothesized that successful outcomes can be achieved by avoiding excessive resection while reshaping only to an extent that prevents mechanical symptoms.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed pediatric and adult patients who had a symptomatic discoid meniscus between 2000 and 2018, who underwent arthroscopic saucerization with at least 10 mm of peripheral length, and who had at least 5 years of follow-up. Radiological parameters were measured on both preoperative and follow-up radiographs. Patient-reported outcome measure scores were recorded at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 57 knees of 53 patients (mean age, 27.6 years [range, 6-65 years]). The mean follow-up duration was 12.1 years (range, 5.0-23.1 years). There were 31 knees in the pediatric group and 26 knees in the adult group. No significant difference was found between the groups or between preoperative and follow-up values for the femorotibial angle (<i>P</i> > .05). When the preoperative and follow-up Kellgren-Lawrence grades were compared, no change was observed in the pediatric group (<i>P</i> = .125), while grades were shown to progress in the adult group (<i>P</i> < .001). The mean Lysholm score was 94.61 ± 7.61 and 84.23 ± 14.90 for the pediatric and adult groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = .001). Overall, 2 patients underwent arthroscopic surgery because of a symptomatic recurrence of symptoms, and 2 patients underwent arthroplasty because of osteoarthritis. The 10-year survival rate was 90.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limited saucerization of a DLM helped to preserve coronal-plane knee joint alignment. Functional and radiological results were superior in the pediatric patients. Even when alignment was more varus in older patients, preoperative and follow-up femorotibial angles were not statistically significant. This outcome may be used to guide treatment in appropriately selected cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3635465241313137"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241313137","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is the most common meniscus variant and is commonly treated with arthroscopic saucerization. There are mixed data regarding long-term results after surgery, especially in terms of radiological parameters.
Purpose/hypothesis: The aim was to evaluate the functional and radiological results of patients who underwent arthroscopic saucerization for a symptomatic DLM. It was hypothesized that successful outcomes can be achieved by avoiding excessive resection while reshaping only to an extent that prevents mechanical symptoms.
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed pediatric and adult patients who had a symptomatic discoid meniscus between 2000 and 2018, who underwent arthroscopic saucerization with at least 10 mm of peripheral length, and who had at least 5 years of follow-up. Radiological parameters were measured on both preoperative and follow-up radiographs. Patient-reported outcome measure scores were recorded at follow-up.
Results: The study included 57 knees of 53 patients (mean age, 27.6 years [range, 6-65 years]). The mean follow-up duration was 12.1 years (range, 5.0-23.1 years). There were 31 knees in the pediatric group and 26 knees in the adult group. No significant difference was found between the groups or between preoperative and follow-up values for the femorotibial angle (P > .05). When the preoperative and follow-up Kellgren-Lawrence grades were compared, no change was observed in the pediatric group (P = .125), while grades were shown to progress in the adult group (P < .001). The mean Lysholm score was 94.61 ± 7.61 and 84.23 ± 14.90 for the pediatric and adult groups, respectively (P = .001). Overall, 2 patients underwent arthroscopic surgery because of a symptomatic recurrence of symptoms, and 2 patients underwent arthroplasty because of osteoarthritis. The 10-year survival rate was 90.6%.
Conclusion: Limited saucerization of a DLM helped to preserve coronal-plane knee joint alignment. Functional and radiological results were superior in the pediatric patients. Even when alignment was more varus in older patients, preoperative and follow-up femorotibial angles were not statistically significant. This outcome may be used to guide treatment in appropriately selected cases.
期刊介绍:
An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information.
This journal is a must-read for:
* Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists
* Sports Medicine Physicians
* Physiatrists
* Athletic Trainers
* Team Physicians
* And Physical Therapists