Global estimates of prevalence of chronic painful neuropathy among patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 28 countries, 2000-24.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ryan S D'Souza, Chandan Saini, Nasir Hussain, Saba Javed, Larry Prokop, Yeng F Her
{"title":"Global estimates of prevalence of chronic painful neuropathy among patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 28 countries, 2000-24.","authors":"Ryan S D'Souza, Chandan Saini, Nasir Hussain, Saba Javed, Larry Prokop, Yeng F Her","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although the prevalence of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has been reported, the proportion of patients with CIPN who report chronic painful neuropathy remains poorly understood, despite its significant impact on patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcome was the pooled prevalence of chronic (≥3 months) painful CIPN among patients diagnosed with CIPN. Estimates from each study were transformed using double arcsine transformation and pooled in a meta-analysis using an inverse variance heterogeneity model. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on geographical region, sex, chemotherapy regimen, primary cancer type, and funding source; meta-regression analysis was conducted based on study design, human development index (HDI), and publication year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>77 studies from 28 countries, encompassing 10 962 patients with CIPN, were included. Among patients diagnosed with CIPN, the pooled prevalence of those reporting chronic painful CIPN was estimated at 41.22% (95% CI 32.40 to 50.19; 95% prediction interval 23.71 to 61.28). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (<i>I²</i>=95.27%; 95% CI for <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> 94.58 to 95.86). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients treated with platinum based agents and taxanes had the highest prevalence of chronic painful CIPN (40.44% and 38.35%, respectively), and among primary cancers, those with lung cancer reported the highest prevalence of chronic painful CIPN (60.26%). Study design, HDI, and publication year were non-significant moderators of prevalence estimates. Based on our GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) assessment, the certainty of evidence was considered very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides the first comprehensive global estimate of the prevalence of chronic painful CIPN, highlighting its significant burden on patients worldwide. The variation in prevalence across geographical regions, chemotherapy regimens, and primary cancers underscores the need for tailored pain management strategies and further research to address potential disparities.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024579459.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although the prevalence of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has been reported, the proportion of patients with CIPN who report chronic painful neuropathy remains poorly understood, despite its significant impact on patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcome was the pooled prevalence of chronic (≥3 months) painful CIPN among patients diagnosed with CIPN. Estimates from each study were transformed using double arcsine transformation and pooled in a meta-analysis using an inverse variance heterogeneity model. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on geographical region, sex, chemotherapy regimen, primary cancer type, and funding source; meta-regression analysis was conducted based on study design, human development index (HDI), and publication year.

Results: 77 studies from 28 countries, encompassing 10 962 patients with CIPN, were included. Among patients diagnosed with CIPN, the pooled prevalence of those reporting chronic painful CIPN was estimated at 41.22% (95% CI 32.40 to 50.19; 95% prediction interval 23.71 to 61.28). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (=95.27%; 95% CI for I2 94.58 to 95.86). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients treated with platinum based agents and taxanes had the highest prevalence of chronic painful CIPN (40.44% and 38.35%, respectively), and among primary cancers, those with lung cancer reported the highest prevalence of chronic painful CIPN (60.26%). Study design, HDI, and publication year were non-significant moderators of prevalence estimates. Based on our GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) assessment, the certainty of evidence was considered very low.

Conclusion: This study provides the first comprehensive global estimate of the prevalence of chronic painful CIPN, highlighting its significant burden on patients worldwide. The variation in prevalence across geographical regions, chemotherapy regimens, and primary cancers underscores the need for tailored pain management strategies and further research to address potential disparities.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42024579459.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信