The Effect of European Health Literacy-Based e-Pulse Education and e-Pulse Instructional Materials on Health Literacy Levels in Adults Aged 45-64: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sebahat Gözüm, Ercan Asi, Merve Şıklaroğlu, Süleyman Şahin, Selma Öncel, Demet İmamoğlu, Suzan Kanlı
{"title":"The Effect of European Health Literacy-Based e-Pulse Education and e-Pulse Instructional Materials on Health Literacy Levels in Adults Aged 45-64: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Sebahat Gözüm, Ercan Asi, Merve Şıklaroğlu, Süleyman Şahin, Selma Öncel, Demet İmamoğlu, Suzan Kanlı","doi":"10.1002/nur.22450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>e-Pulse is an electronic personal health record system known as e-Nabız in Turkey. This study compares the effect of European Health Literacy-based e-Pulse education and e-Pulse instructional materials on the health literacy levels of adults aged 45-64 with inadequate and problematic-limited health literacy levels. This single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2023 to September 2023. It included 140 participants, assigned to either the intervention group (n = 70) or the active control group (n = 70). The intervention group received HLS-EU-based e-Pulse education, which consisted of two 45-min sessions over 6 weeks, along with the e-Pulse user guide and introduction video. The active control group only received the e-Pulse user guide and introduction video, and each participant was individually briefed on the e-Pulse system content for 5-10 min. Results were measured using the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) and the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) at baseline and the sixth week. Both the intervention and active control groups showed an increase in health literacy and eHealth literacy scores, but the mean change was greater in the intervention group. A statistically significant difference was found in the effects of HLS-EU-based e-Pulse education and e-Pulse instructional materials on both health literacy (F (1, 137) = 25.215; p < 0.001) and eHealth literacy (F (1, 137) = 36.134; p < 0.001). HLS-EU-based e-Pulse education significantly improved health literacy (d = 0.8492; p < 0.001) and eHealth literacy (d = 1.0175; p < 0.001) compared to e-Pulse instructional materials. The intervention group demonstrated significantly higher rates of sufficient (32.9%) and excellent (12.9%) health literacy. Notably, a medium correlation (r = 0.602; p < 0.001) was observed between health literacy and eHealth literacy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05831254) https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05831254.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

e-Pulse is an electronic personal health record system known as e-Nabız in Turkey. This study compares the effect of European Health Literacy-based e-Pulse education and e-Pulse instructional materials on the health literacy levels of adults aged 45-64 with inadequate and problematic-limited health literacy levels. This single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2023 to September 2023. It included 140 participants, assigned to either the intervention group (n = 70) or the active control group (n = 70). The intervention group received HLS-EU-based e-Pulse education, which consisted of two 45-min sessions over 6 weeks, along with the e-Pulse user guide and introduction video. The active control group only received the e-Pulse user guide and introduction video, and each participant was individually briefed on the e-Pulse system content for 5-10 min. Results were measured using the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) and the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) at baseline and the sixth week. Both the intervention and active control groups showed an increase in health literacy and eHealth literacy scores, but the mean change was greater in the intervention group. A statistically significant difference was found in the effects of HLS-EU-based e-Pulse education and e-Pulse instructional materials on both health literacy (F (1, 137) = 25.215; p < 0.001) and eHealth literacy (F (1, 137) = 36.134; p < 0.001). HLS-EU-based e-Pulse education significantly improved health literacy (d = 0.8492; p < 0.001) and eHealth literacy (d = 1.0175; p < 0.001) compared to e-Pulse instructional materials. The intervention group demonstrated significantly higher rates of sufficient (32.9%) and excellent (12.9%) health literacy. Notably, a medium correlation (r = 0.602; p < 0.001) was observed between health literacy and eHealth literacy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05831254) https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05831254.

基于欧洲健康素养的电子脉冲教育及电子脉冲教材对45-64岁成人健康素养水平的影响:一项随机对照试验。
e-Pulse是一个电子个人健康记录系统,在土耳其被称为e-Nabız。本研究比较了基于欧洲健康素养的e-Pulse教育和e-Pulse教学材料对45-64岁健康素养水平不足和有问题的成年人健康素养水平的影响。这项单盲、随机对照试验于2023年6月至2023年9月进行。它包括140名参与者,分为干预组(n = 70)和积极对照组(n = 70)。干预组接受基于hhs - eu的e-Pulse教育,包括两个45分钟的课程,为期6周,以及e-Pulse用户指南和介绍视频。主动对照组只收到e-Pulse用户指南和介绍视频,每位参与者单独听取e-Pulse系统内容5-10分钟。在基线和第六周使用欧洲健康素养调查问卷(HLS-EU-Q47)和电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)测量结果。干预组和积极对照组的健康素养和电子健康素养得分均有所提高,但干预组的平均变化更大。以hls - eu为基础的e-Pulse教育和e-Pulse教材对健康素养的影响有统计学显著差异(F (1,137) = 25.215;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信