Nurse Practitioner Care Environments and Provider Shortages Among Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1002/nur.22446
Amy McMenamin, Eleanor Turi, Jianfang Liu, Grant Martsolf, Lusine Poghosyan
{"title":"Nurse Practitioner Care Environments and Provider Shortages Among Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.","authors":"Amy McMenamin, Eleanor Turi, Jianfang Liu, Grant Martsolf, Lusine Poghosyan","doi":"10.1002/nur.22446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In health professional shortage areas (HPSAs), primary care providers face challenges due to high workloads and limited resources, impacting their ability to provide comprehensive care to patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). In addition, patients in HPSA compared to non-HPSA settings experience poorer outcomes. Nurse practitioners (NPs) play a crucial role in meeting MCC patients' needs, but some work in unfavorable care environments (e.g., lacking teamwork, support, and autonomy) that hinder their capacity to manage complex chronic diseases. This study examines the effect of NP care environments on the relationship between HPSA status and hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits among patients with MCCs. We conducted a secondary analysis of merged Medicare claims, NP survey data, and Health Resources and Services Administration data. Our sample included 779 practices with 394,424 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65+ who had at least two of 15 chronic conditions. We used logistic regression to evaluate the impact of HPSA status and the NP care environment on ED visits or hospitalizations. NP care environments moderate the association between HPSA status and hospitalization (AOR 1.165, 95% CI [1.037-1.309], p = 0.010) but not ED use. Improved care environments are associated with lower odds of hospitalization in non-HPSAs (β = -0.148, 95% CI [-0.225, -0.072], p = 0.0001), while in HPSAs, improved care environments have no effect on hospitalization odds (β = 0.0047, 95% CI [-0.086, 0.096], p = 0.920). Addressing provider shortages in HPSAs may allow an improved NP care environment to produce maximal benefits for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"271-280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In health professional shortage areas (HPSAs), primary care providers face challenges due to high workloads and limited resources, impacting their ability to provide comprehensive care to patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). In addition, patients in HPSA compared to non-HPSA settings experience poorer outcomes. Nurse practitioners (NPs) play a crucial role in meeting MCC patients' needs, but some work in unfavorable care environments (e.g., lacking teamwork, support, and autonomy) that hinder their capacity to manage complex chronic diseases. This study examines the effect of NP care environments on the relationship between HPSA status and hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits among patients with MCCs. We conducted a secondary analysis of merged Medicare claims, NP survey data, and Health Resources and Services Administration data. Our sample included 779 practices with 394,424 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65+ who had at least two of 15 chronic conditions. We used logistic regression to evaluate the impact of HPSA status and the NP care environment on ED visits or hospitalizations. NP care environments moderate the association between HPSA status and hospitalization (AOR 1.165, 95% CI [1.037-1.309], p = 0.010) but not ED use. Improved care environments are associated with lower odds of hospitalization in non-HPSAs (β = -0.148, 95% CI [-0.225, -0.072], p = 0.0001), while in HPSAs, improved care environments have no effect on hospitalization odds (β = 0.0047, 95% CI [-0.086, 0.096], p = 0.920). Addressing provider shortages in HPSAs may allow an improved NP care environment to produce maximal benefits for patients.

护士执业护理环境和提供者短缺的患者与多种慢性疾病。
在卫生专业人员短缺地区(hpsa),由于工作量大和资源有限,初级保健提供者面临挑战,影响了他们向患有多种慢性疾病(mcc)的患者提供全面护理的能力。此外,与非HPSA患者相比,HPSA患者的预后较差。护士从业人员(NPs)在满足MCC患者需求方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但一些工作环境不利(例如,缺乏团队合作、支持和自主权),阻碍了他们管理复杂慢性疾病的能力。本研究探讨NP护理环境对mcc患者HPSA状态与住院或急诊(ED)就诊之间关系的影响。我们对合并的医疗保险索赔、NP调查数据和卫生资源与服务管理局数据进行了二次分析。我们的样本包括779个实践,394,424名65岁以上的医疗保险受益人,他们至少患有15种慢性病中的两种。我们使用逻辑回归来评估HPSA状态和NP护理环境对急诊科就诊或住院的影响。NP护理环境调节HPSA状态与住院之间的关联(AOR为1.165,95% CI [1.037-1.309], p = 0.010),但不影响ED的使用。改善的护理环境与非hpsa患者住院率降低相关(β = -0.148, 95% CI [-0.225, -0.072], p = 0.0001),而在hpsa患者中,改善的护理环境对住院率没有影响(β = 0.0047, 95% CI [-0.086, 0.096], p = 0.920)。解决hpsa的提供者短缺问题可能会改善NP护理环境,为患者带来最大的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信