Methods and Efficacy of Processing Testicular Sperm Samples in Obstructive and Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: A Systematic Review.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Mens Health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.22514/jomh.2024.182
Terrence C Tsou, Shagnik Ray, Mahir Maruf, Taylor P Kohn, Mohammad H Zaman, Michael F Ayenew, Arvin K George, Amin S Herati
{"title":"Methods and Efficacy of Processing Testicular Sperm Samples in Obstructive and Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Terrence C Tsou, Shagnik Ray, Mahir Maruf, Taylor P Kohn, Mohammad H Zaman, Michael F Ayenew, Arvin K George, Amin S Herati","doi":"10.22514/jomh.2024.182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a cornerstone in managing male infertility, especially in obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), necessitating sperm retrieval via testicular sperm extraction (TESE) or microdissection TESE (mTESE). However, the varied post-sperm extraction processing methods pose uncertainty regarding optimal approaches. To address this, a systematic review following preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines was conducted, identifying 16 relevant studies. These studies exhibited significant heterogeneity in methodologies and outcomes, with mechanical preparation and enzymatic digestion being the primary techniques investigated. Mechanical methods, including shredding, mincing, vortexing, and crushing, yielded varying sperm counts per 100 mg of tissue, with mincing showing promise in NOA cases. Enzymatic digestion, particularly with collagenase type IV, also showed effectiveness, though inconsistently. Additionally, techniques such as microfluidics and magnetic levitation showed potential for improving sperm retrieval efficiency. However, the lack of standardization in outcomes and reporting impedes the establishment of best practice protocols. While collagenase type IV with elastase seemed promising for OA samples and microfluidics for NOA cases, further studies with standardized methodologies and outcomes are necessary. Assessment of DNA damage and comparisons of ICSI success rates between processing methods are crucial for informed clinical practice. In conclusion, optimizing sperm quantity and quality for ICSI necessitates standardized methodologies and outcomes, with microfluidics and collagenase type IV with elastase showing promise pending further validation through well-designed studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mens Health","volume":"20 11","pages":"19-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mens Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jomh.2024.182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a cornerstone in managing male infertility, especially in obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), necessitating sperm retrieval via testicular sperm extraction (TESE) or microdissection TESE (mTESE). However, the varied post-sperm extraction processing methods pose uncertainty regarding optimal approaches. To address this, a systematic review following preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines was conducted, identifying 16 relevant studies. These studies exhibited significant heterogeneity in methodologies and outcomes, with mechanical preparation and enzymatic digestion being the primary techniques investigated. Mechanical methods, including shredding, mincing, vortexing, and crushing, yielded varying sperm counts per 100 mg of tissue, with mincing showing promise in NOA cases. Enzymatic digestion, particularly with collagenase type IV, also showed effectiveness, though inconsistently. Additionally, techniques such as microfluidics and magnetic levitation showed potential for improving sperm retrieval efficiency. However, the lack of standardization in outcomes and reporting impedes the establishment of best practice protocols. While collagenase type IV with elastase seemed promising for OA samples and microfluidics for NOA cases, further studies with standardized methodologies and outcomes are necessary. Assessment of DNA damage and comparisons of ICSI success rates between processing methods are crucial for informed clinical practice. In conclusion, optimizing sperm quantity and quality for ICSI necessitates standardized methodologies and outcomes, with microfluidics and collagenase type IV with elastase showing promise pending further validation through well-designed studies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mens Health
Journal of Mens Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
28.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JOMH is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. JOMH publishes cutting-edge advances in a wide range of diseases and conditions, including diagnostic procedures, therapeutic management strategies, and innovative clinical research in gender-based biology. It also addresses sexual disparities in health, life expectancy, lifestyle and behaviors and so on. Scientists are encouraged to publish their experimental, theoretical, and descriptive studies and observations in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信