How changes in GPs' ways of working have affected community nurses: a qualitative study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-29 Print Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0534
Louisa Polak, Kristian Pollock, Stephen Barclay, Ben Bowers
{"title":"How changes in GPs' ways of working have affected community nurses: a qualitative study.","authors":"Louisa Polak, Kristian Pollock, Stephen Barclay, Ben Bowers","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A growing literature examines the way two changes in primary care - the shift towards remote working and the diversification of practice teams to incorporate, for instance, physician associates and paramedics - affect patient care within the practice. However, little is known about the effect of these changes on community nurses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore community nurses' experiences of delivering palliative care in the context of GPs' new ways of working.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study using focus groups in the UK.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Focus groups were conducted on Zoom with community nurses. Data were analysed thematically using constant comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Community nurses described extending their roles in palliative care. Alongside pride and satisfaction about this, participants raised several areas of concern and dissatisfaction, some of which they associated with changes in GPs' ways of working. Two reasons for dissatisfaction concerned remote working. First, remote communication with colleagues was seen as creating obstacles to nurses' everyday collaboration with GPs, damaging important working relationships. Second, nurses increased their workload by taking the lead in person-centred care where they saw remote provision by GPs as unsatisfactory. Where workforce diversification led to delegating home visits to paramedics or nurse practitioners, community nurses described feeling a lack of the 'GP back-up' that many identified as essential for community palliative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When considering and evaluating interventions that change the way GPs work, policymakers and commissioners should look not only at consequences that affect primary care teams, but also at the effects across the complex ecosystem within which these teams operate.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e406-e411"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A growing literature examines the way two changes in primary care - the shift towards remote working and the diversification of practice teams to incorporate, for instance, physician associates and paramedics - affect patient care within the practice. However, little is known about the effect of these changes on community nurses.

Aim: To explore community nurses' experiences of delivering palliative care in the context of GPs' new ways of working.

Design and setting: Qualitative study using focus groups in the UK.

Method: Focus groups were conducted on Zoom with community nurses. Data were analysed thematically using constant comparison.

Results: Community nurses described extending their roles in palliative care. Alongside pride and satisfaction about this, participants raised several areas of concern and dissatisfaction, some of which they associated with changes in GPs' ways of working. Two reasons for dissatisfaction concerned remote working. First, remote communication with colleagues was seen as creating obstacles to nurses' everyday collaboration with GPs, damaging important working relationships. Second, nurses increased their workload by taking the lead in person-centred care where they saw remote provision by GPs as unsatisfactory. Where workforce diversification led to delegating home visits to paramedics or nurse practitioners, community nurses described feeling a lack of the 'GP back-up' that many identified as essential for community palliative care.

Conclusion: When considering and evaluating interventions that change the way GPs work, policymakers and commissioners should look not only at consequences that affect primary care teams, but also at the effects across the complex ecosystem within which these teams operate.

全科医生的新工作方式如何影响社区护士?定性研究。
越来越多的文献研究了初级保健的两个变化——向远程工作的转变,以及实践团队的多样化,例如,医师助理和护理人员——在实践中影响患者护理的方式。然而,人们对这些变化对社区护士的影响知之甚少。目的探讨社区护士在全科医生新工作方式背景下提供姑息治疗的经验。设计和设置使用焦点小组的定性研究。方法采用Zoom对在英国工作的社区护士进行焦点小组调查。数据按主题进行分析,采用持续比较。结果社区护士描述了他们在姑息治疗中的作用。除了对此感到自豪和满意之外,参与者还提出了一些担忧和不满,其中一些与全科医生工作方式的变化有关。两项不满与远程工作有关。首先,与同事的远程通信被视为对护士与全科医生的日常合作造成障碍,破坏了重要的工作关系。其次,护士在以人为本的护理中发挥主导作用,增加了工作量,因为他们认为全科医生的远程提供不令人满意。在劳动力多样化导致将家访委托给护理人员或执业护士的地方,社区护士描述了缺乏“全科医生后备”的感觉,许多人认为这对社区姑息治疗至关重要。在考虑和评估改变全科医生工作方式的干预措施时,政策制定者和专员不仅应该关注影响初级保健团队的后果,还应该关注这些团队所处的复杂生态系统的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信