Psychosocial assessment and its association with mortality in kidney transplant candidates.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hye Jin Chong, Min Kyeong Jang
{"title":"Psychosocial assessment and its association with mortality in kidney transplant candidates.","authors":"Hye Jin Chong, Min Kyeong Jang","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2457538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the association between the Global Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates Transplant score and survival in deceased donor kidney transplant candidates. A longitudinal cohort design was employed. The 142 candidates recruited were registered on the waiting list for deceased donor kidney transplants at a transplant center. Initially, candidates who enrolled in this study in 2016 were divided into high- and low-risk psychosocial cohorts, based on their Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates Transplant score, with a cut-off of 3 points. In 2022, the mortality rate was compared according to whether the initial Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates Transplant score was < 3 or ≥ 3 points. This study included data from 139 deceased donor kidney transplant candidates. An initial Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates Transplant score of < 3 was associated with higher mortality five years after being on the waiting list (hazard ratio = 2.39, <i>p</i> = .031). A high-risk status for psychosocial problems according to the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates Transplant score predicted a significantly lower five-year survival for candidates on the waiting list for a deceased donor kidney transplant. Therefore, the psychosocial status of candidates on the waitlist for kidney transplantation should be regularly screened and systematically managed to improve their psychosocial status and make them more suitable candidates for transplant surgery. A psychosocial intervention should be developed to improve these patients' psychosocial status and promote positive health outcomes after kidney transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2457538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the association between the Global Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates Transplant score and survival in deceased donor kidney transplant candidates. A longitudinal cohort design was employed. The 142 candidates recruited were registered on the waiting list for deceased donor kidney transplants at a transplant center. Initially, candidates who enrolled in this study in 2016 were divided into high- and low-risk psychosocial cohorts, based on their Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates Transplant score, with a cut-off of 3 points. In 2022, the mortality rate was compared according to whether the initial Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates Transplant score was < 3 or ≥ 3 points. This study included data from 139 deceased donor kidney transplant candidates. An initial Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates Transplant score of < 3 was associated with higher mortality five years after being on the waiting list (hazard ratio = 2.39, p = .031). A high-risk status for psychosocial problems according to the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates Transplant score predicted a significantly lower five-year survival for candidates on the waiting list for a deceased donor kidney transplant. Therefore, the psychosocial status of candidates on the waitlist for kidney transplantation should be regularly screened and systematically managed to improve their psychosocial status and make them more suitable candidates for transplant surgery. A psychosocial intervention should be developed to improve these patients' psychosocial status and promote positive health outcomes after kidney transplantation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信