Timothy C Horan, Michael R Baer, Kishan S Shah, Jeffrey M Wilde, Steven N Copp, William D Bugbee
{"title":"Preoperative Resilience as a Predictor of Postoperative Regret and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Timothy C Horan, Michael R Baer, Kishan S Shah, Jeffrey M Wilde, Steven N Copp, William D Bugbee","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-established treatment option for advanced knee osteoarthritis, yet some patients remain unsatisfied after surgery. Evaluation of various psychosocial parameters may improve patient optimization and outcomes. The primary aim was to assess whether preoperative resilience remained stable and influenced decision regret postoperatively while the secondary aim was to evaluate its correlation with joint-specific and global health patient-reported outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,269 patients undergoing elective unilateral TKA were included. Patients completed the Brief Resilience Scale preoperatively and postoperatively and were stratified into low, normal, and high resilience cohorts. Decision regret scale scores were obtained postoperatively, and patients were stratified into no regret, mild regret, and moderate/severe regret cohorts. Patients' knee pain and function were assessed using the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement survey. Physical and mental quality of life was measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, 8% of patients were categorized as having low resilience, 67% had normal resilience, and 25% had high resilience. Resilience among each cohort remained relatively static. A statistically significant negative correlation between Brief Resilience Scale and decision regret scale scores was observed at 12-month follow-up (P < 0.001). The high resilience cohort demonstrated the lowest decision regret scale scores at all time points. The low resilience cohort reported higher decision regret scale scores at all time points but had the most improvement over the 12-month follow-up (P < 0.001). Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement scores had a weak-to-low positive correlation with preoperative resilience (r = 0.29, P = 0.05). Preoperative resilience had a low positive correlation with PROMIS-10 Physical scores (r = 0.36, P < 0.05), but a moderately strong positive correlation with PROMIS-10 Mental scores (r = 0.47, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative resilience can markedly influence decision regret after TKA. These findings are valuable because they can help surgeons appropriately counsel patients, leading to improved satisfaction after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-established treatment option for advanced knee osteoarthritis, yet some patients remain unsatisfied after surgery. Evaluation of various psychosocial parameters may improve patient optimization and outcomes. The primary aim was to assess whether preoperative resilience remained stable and influenced decision regret postoperatively while the secondary aim was to evaluate its correlation with joint-specific and global health patient-reported outcome measures.
Methods: A total of 1,269 patients undergoing elective unilateral TKA were included. Patients completed the Brief Resilience Scale preoperatively and postoperatively and were stratified into low, normal, and high resilience cohorts. Decision regret scale scores were obtained postoperatively, and patients were stratified into no regret, mild regret, and moderate/severe regret cohorts. Patients' knee pain and function were assessed using the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement survey. Physical and mental quality of life was measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-10).
Results: Preoperatively, 8% of patients were categorized as having low resilience, 67% had normal resilience, and 25% had high resilience. Resilience among each cohort remained relatively static. A statistically significant negative correlation between Brief Resilience Scale and decision regret scale scores was observed at 12-month follow-up (P < 0.001). The high resilience cohort demonstrated the lowest decision regret scale scores at all time points. The low resilience cohort reported higher decision regret scale scores at all time points but had the most improvement over the 12-month follow-up (P < 0.001). Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement scores had a weak-to-low positive correlation with preoperative resilience (r = 0.29, P = 0.05). Preoperative resilience had a low positive correlation with PROMIS-10 Physical scores (r = 0.36, P < 0.05), but a moderately strong positive correlation with PROMIS-10 Mental scores (r = 0.47, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Preoperative resilience can markedly influence decision regret after TKA. These findings are valuable because they can help surgeons appropriately counsel patients, leading to improved satisfaction after surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues.
Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.