Assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy's impact on complications following radical cystectomy.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mounish Nuthalapati, Arun Ramdas Menon, Vivek Dadasaheb Patil, Sheejamol Velickakathu Sukumaran, Prashanth Reddy Yensani, Shashank Agrawal, Nikhil Krishna Haridas, Haridas Nair, Sohini Chandra Ganesuni, Nivedita Suresh, Bindu Mangalath Rajamma, Ginil Kumar Pooleri
{"title":"Assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy's impact on complications following radical cystectomy.","authors":"Mounish Nuthalapati, Arun Ramdas Menon, Vivek Dadasaheb Patil, Sheejamol Velickakathu Sukumaran, Prashanth Reddy Yensani, Shashank Agrawal, Nikhil Krishna Haridas, Haridas Nair, Sohini Chandra Ganesuni, Nivedita Suresh, Bindu Mangalath Rajamma, Ginil Kumar Pooleri","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_217_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite level 1 evidence supporting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), its adoption is hindered by concerns about toxicity and detrimental impact on post-RC complications. We retrospectively reviewed post-RC complications at a tertiary care hospital, particularly assessing impact of NACT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the institutional bladder cancer database were retrieved for patients aged ≥18 with MIBC (≥American Joint Committee on Cancer Clinical Stage T2), treated with RC between May 2013 and July 2023. Exclusions were nonurothelial histology, salvage cystectomy, and palliative intent. Data abstracted included patient characteristics, NACT administration, surgery, and outcomes. Patients were divided into two groups based on NACT and compared. Complications were categorized as early (≤30 days) or late (31-90 days) and graded. Statistical analysis set significance at <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 154 patients who underwent RC, 33 were excluded due to non-MIBC, nonurothelial histology, or salvage cystectomy. The 121 patients analyzed had a mean age of 64 years and a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 4.9. Among them, 61 received NACT and 60 did not. There was no significant difference between the NACT+RC and RC-only groups in overall complication rates (85.3% vs. 75.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.16) or in major complications (50.8% vs. 58.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.41). CCI >5 predicted major complications, while NACT did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study of MIBC patients managed at a tertiary care institute in India, NACT administration did not increase postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 1","pages":"28-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11778685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_217_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite level 1 evidence supporting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), its adoption is hindered by concerns about toxicity and detrimental impact on post-RC complications. We retrospectively reviewed post-RC complications at a tertiary care hospital, particularly assessing impact of NACT.

Methods: Data from the institutional bladder cancer database were retrieved for patients aged ≥18 with MIBC (≥American Joint Committee on Cancer Clinical Stage T2), treated with RC between May 2013 and July 2023. Exclusions were nonurothelial histology, salvage cystectomy, and palliative intent. Data abstracted included patient characteristics, NACT administration, surgery, and outcomes. Patients were divided into two groups based on NACT and compared. Complications were categorized as early (≤30 days) or late (31-90 days) and graded. Statistical analysis set significance at P < 0.05.

Results: Of 154 patients who underwent RC, 33 were excluded due to non-MIBC, nonurothelial histology, or salvage cystectomy. The 121 patients analyzed had a mean age of 64 years and a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 4.9. Among them, 61 received NACT and 60 did not. There was no significant difference between the NACT+RC and RC-only groups in overall complication rates (85.3% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.16) or in major complications (50.8% vs. 58.3%, P = 0.41). CCI >5 predicted major complications, while NACT did not.

Conclusion: In our study of MIBC patients managed at a tertiary care institute in India, NACT administration did not increase postoperative complications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
Indian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Urology-IJU (ISSN 0970-1591) is official publication of the Urological Society of India. The journal is published Quarterly. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, CAB Abstracts, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Excerpta Medica / EMBASE, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Global Health, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信