Characteristics of Sciatic Scoliosis in Lumbar Disc Herniation and Comparative Radiographic Outcomes After Treatment With Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Tinnakorn Pluemvitayaporn, Suttinont Surapuchong, Sombat Kunakornsawat, Suppanut Tuntirungrojchai, Suwit Tangcharoenwathanakul, Warot Ratanakoosakul, Kitjapat Tiracharnvut, Pritsanai Pruttikul, Chaiwat Piyasakulkaew, Piyabuth Kittithamvongs
{"title":"Characteristics of Sciatic Scoliosis in Lumbar Disc Herniation and Comparative Radiographic Outcomes After Treatment With Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy","authors":"Tinnakorn Pluemvitayaporn,&nbsp;Suttinont Surapuchong,&nbsp;Sombat Kunakornsawat,&nbsp;Suppanut Tuntirungrojchai,&nbsp;Suwit Tangcharoenwathanakul,&nbsp;Warot Ratanakoosakul,&nbsp;Kitjapat Tiracharnvut,&nbsp;Pritsanai Pruttikul,&nbsp;Chaiwat Piyasakulkaew,&nbsp;Piyabuth Kittithamvongs","doi":"10.1111/ases.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Sciatic scoliosis is attributed to non-structural scoliosis resulting from the irritation of spinal nerve roots. Although limited research has addressed the specific characteristics of sciatic scoliotic curve patterns, there is a lack of reported data on the pre- and post-radiographic outcomes of patients with sciatic scoliosis caused by lumbar disc herniation who have undergone full-endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (FEID).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To analyze the distinctive pattern and compare the radiographic results in patients with sciatic scoliosis caused by lumbar disc herniation who have undergone FEID.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The medical records of patients with sciatic scoliosis caused by lumbar disc herniation who underwent FEID from 2016 to 2022 were gathered and analyzed. The study focused on the prevalence of sciatic scoliosis, the specific location of the lumbar disc herniation, the level of the curve in sciatic scoliosis, and the comparison of pre- and post-operative changes in radiographic outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 178 patients were analyzed, revealing a prevalence of sciatic scoliosis at 33.7% (60 out of 178). The predominant anatomical location of lumbar disc herniation in cases of sciatic scoliosis was found to be the L4-L5 level, accounting for 56.67% (34 out of 60). The observed lumbosacral curve exhibited a typical pattern with a mean Cobb angle of 14° (range: 2.5–35, standard deviation = 7.46). The mean C7PL-CSVL distance was also measured at 36.2 mm (range: 1–170, standard deviation = 32.5). The mean lumbar lordosis was 21° (range: −1.8–50, standard deviation = 12.96), while the mean Sagittal vertical axis was recorded at 40.9 mm (range: −85–160, standard deviation = 47.8). Notably, no statistically significant difference was observed in the anatomical location of lumbar disc herniation and the apical curve level of sciatic scoliosis. Furthermore, 68% of cases of sciatic scoliosis demonstrated improvement within 12 months, with the average time to improvement being 4 months following FEID.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The FEID procedure has the potential to lead to the natural resolution of sciatic scoliosis within a year. These findings suggest that sciatic scoliosis may not be a reliable indicator for determining the specific anatomical location of disc herniation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Background

Sciatic scoliosis is attributed to non-structural scoliosis resulting from the irritation of spinal nerve roots. Although limited research has addressed the specific characteristics of sciatic scoliotic curve patterns, there is a lack of reported data on the pre- and post-radiographic outcomes of patients with sciatic scoliosis caused by lumbar disc herniation who have undergone full-endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (FEID).

Objectives

To analyze the distinctive pattern and compare the radiographic results in patients with sciatic scoliosis caused by lumbar disc herniation who have undergone FEID.

Methods

The medical records of patients with sciatic scoliosis caused by lumbar disc herniation who underwent FEID from 2016 to 2022 were gathered and analyzed. The study focused on the prevalence of sciatic scoliosis, the specific location of the lumbar disc herniation, the level of the curve in sciatic scoliosis, and the comparison of pre- and post-operative changes in radiographic outcomes.

Results

A total of 178 patients were analyzed, revealing a prevalence of sciatic scoliosis at 33.7% (60 out of 178). The predominant anatomical location of lumbar disc herniation in cases of sciatic scoliosis was found to be the L4-L5 level, accounting for 56.67% (34 out of 60). The observed lumbosacral curve exhibited a typical pattern with a mean Cobb angle of 14° (range: 2.5–35, standard deviation = 7.46). The mean C7PL-CSVL distance was also measured at 36.2 mm (range: 1–170, standard deviation = 32.5). The mean lumbar lordosis was 21° (range: −1.8–50, standard deviation = 12.96), while the mean Sagittal vertical axis was recorded at 40.9 mm (range: −85–160, standard deviation = 47.8). Notably, no statistically significant difference was observed in the anatomical location of lumbar disc herniation and the apical curve level of sciatic scoliosis. Furthermore, 68% of cases of sciatic scoliosis demonstrated improvement within 12 months, with the average time to improvement being 4 months following FEID.

Conclusion

The FEID procedure has the potential to lead to the natural resolution of sciatic scoliosis within a year. These findings suggest that sciatic scoliosis may not be a reliable indicator for determining the specific anatomical location of disc herniation.

腰椎间盘突出后坐骨侧凸的特点及全内窥镜椎间盘切除术后的放射学比较。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。背景:坐骨侧凸是由脊髓神经根刺激引起的非结构性侧凸。虽然有限的研究已经解决了坐骨侧凸曲线模式的具体特征,但缺乏关于经全内窥镜椎间盘切除术(FEID)的腰椎间盘突出引起的坐骨侧凸患者放射前后预后的报道数据。目的:分析腰椎间盘突出性坐骨侧凸行FEID的特点,并比较其影像学表现。方法:收集2016 - 2022年经FEID治疗的腰椎间盘突出性坐骨侧凸患者的病历资料并进行分析。该研究的重点是坐骨侧凸的患病率,腰椎间盘突出的具体位置,坐骨侧凸的曲线水平,以及术前和术后影像学结果变化的比较。结果:共分析了178例患者,显示坐骨侧凸患病率为33.7%(178例中有60例)。坐骨侧凸患者腰椎间盘突出的主要解剖位置为L4-L5节段,占56.67%(34 / 60)。观察到的腰骶曲线呈现典型的模式,平均Cobb角为14°(范围:2.5-35,标准差= 7.46)。测量C7PL-CSVL平均距离为36.2 mm(范围:1-170,标准差= 32.5)。腰椎前凸平均为21°(范围:-1.8-50,标准差= 12.96),矢状垂直轴平均为40.9 mm(范围:-85-160,标准差= 47.8)。值得注意的是,在腰椎间盘突出的解剖位置和坐骨侧凸的根尖曲线水平上,两组间差异无统计学意义。此外,68%的坐骨侧凸病例在12个月内得到改善,FEID后平均改善时间为4个月。结论:FEID手术有可能在一年内使坐骨侧凸自然消退。这些结果表明,坐骨侧凸可能不是确定椎间盘突出具体解剖位置的可靠指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信