Circumstantial risk factors for death after intensive care unit-to-unit inter-hospital transfer-a Swedish registry study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jesper Sternley, Karl Stattin, Max Petzold, Jonatan Oras, Christian Rylander
{"title":"Circumstantial risk factors for death after intensive care unit-to-unit inter-hospital transfer-a Swedish registry study.","authors":"Jesper Sternley, Karl Stattin, Max Petzold, Jonatan Oras, Christian Rylander","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01325-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unit-to-unit transfer of critically ill patients infers hazards that may cause adverse events. Circumstantial factors associated with mortality after intensive care include days in the ICU, night-time or weekend discharge and capacity transfer as compared to other reasons for transfer. Distance travelled may also constitute an indirect risk. The aim of this study was to assess potential associations between these circumstantial factors and the risk of death 30 days after transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 2015 to 2019 was retrieved from the Swedish Intensive Care Registry. Logistic regression was used for risk analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,327 patients, 965 (22%) were deceased 30 days after transfer. 1351 patients undergoing capacity transfer had a higher morbidity than patients transferred for other reasons. Using univariable logistic regression, days spent in the referring ICU before transfer, capacity transfer as compared to clinical transfer and repatriation as well as SAPS3 in the receiving ICU were associated with a higher risk of death at 30 days. However, after multivariable regression with adjustment for ICD-10 diagnosis and Standardised Mortality Rate in the receiving ICU, these associations were lost.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that inter-hospital transfer is safe to carry out at any time of day and over shorter as well as longer distances.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01325-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unit-to-unit transfer of critically ill patients infers hazards that may cause adverse events. Circumstantial factors associated with mortality after intensive care include days in the ICU, night-time or weekend discharge and capacity transfer as compared to other reasons for transfer. Distance travelled may also constitute an indirect risk. The aim of this study was to assess potential associations between these circumstantial factors and the risk of death 30 days after transfer.

Methods: Data from 2015 to 2019 was retrieved from the Swedish Intensive Care Registry. Logistic regression was used for risk analysis.

Results: Among 4,327 patients, 965 (22%) were deceased 30 days after transfer. 1351 patients undergoing capacity transfer had a higher morbidity than patients transferred for other reasons. Using univariable logistic regression, days spent in the referring ICU before transfer, capacity transfer as compared to clinical transfer and repatriation as well as SAPS3 in the receiving ICU were associated with a higher risk of death at 30 days. However, after multivariable regression with adjustment for ICD-10 diagnosis and Standardised Mortality Rate in the receiving ICU, these associations were lost.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that inter-hospital transfer is safe to carry out at any time of day and over shorter as well as longer distances.

重症监护病房到医院间转院后死亡的间接危险因素——瑞典登记研究
背景:危重病人的单位间转移可以推断可能导致不良事件的危险。与重症监护后死亡率相关的环境因素包括在ICU的天数、夜间或周末出院以及与其他转移原因相比的能力转移。旅行距离也可能构成间接风险。本研究的目的是评估这些环境因素与移植后30天死亡风险之间的潜在关联。方法:从瑞典重症监护登记处检索2015年至2019年的数据。采用Logistic回归进行风险分析。结果:4327例患者中,965例(22%)在转移后30天死亡。1351例容量转移患者的发病率高于其他原因转移的患者。采用单变量logistic回归分析,转院前在转诊ICU的天数、与临床转院和遣返相比的能力转移以及接收ICU的SAPS3与30天死亡风险较高相关。然而,在调整ICD-10诊断和接收ICU的标准化死亡率的多变量回归后,这些关联消失了。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在一天中的任何时间进行医院间转院是安全的,无论是短途还是长途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信