Anying Bai, Shan He, Yu Jiang, Weihao Xu, Zhanyi Lin
{"title":"Comparison of 3 Aging Metrics in Dual Declines to Capture All-Cause Dementia and Mortality Risk: Cohort Study.","authors":"Anying Bai, Shan He, Yu Jiang, Weihao Xu, Zhanyi Lin","doi":"10.2196/66104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utility of aging metrics that incorporate cognitive and physical function is not fully understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to compare the predictive capacities of 3 distinct aging metrics-motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), physio-cognitive decline syndrome (PCDS), and cognitive frailty (CF)-for incident dementia and all-cause mortality among community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used longitudinal data from waves 10-15 of the Health and Retirement Study. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was employed to evaluate the effects of MCR, PCDS, and CF on incident all-cause dementia and mortality, controlling for socioeconomic and lifestyle factors, as well as medical comorbidities. Discrimination analysis was conducted to assess and compare the predictive accuracy of the 3 aging metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2367 older individuals aged 65 years and older, with no baseline prevalence of dementia or disability, were ultimately included. The prevalence rates of MCR, PCDS, and CF were 5.4%, 6.3%, and 1.3%, respectively. Over a decade-long follow-up period, 341 cases of dementia and 573 deaths were recorded. All 3 metrics were predictive of incident all-cause dementia and mortality when adjusting for multiple confounders, with variations in the strength of their associations (incident dementia: MCR odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.30-2.78; CF 5.06, 95% CI 2.87-8.92; PCDS 3.35, 95% CI 2.44-4.58; mortality: MCR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17-2.19; CF 3.26, 95% CI 1.99-5.33; and PCDS 1.58, 95% CI 1.17-2.13). The C-index indicated that PCDS and MCR had the highest discriminatory accuracy for all-cause dementia and mortality, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the inherent differences among the aging metrics that integrate cognitive and physical functions, they consistently identified risks of dementia and mortality. This underscores the importance of implementing targeted preventive strategies and intervention programs based on these metrics to enhance the overall quality of life and reduce premature deaths in aging populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e66104"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The utility of aging metrics that incorporate cognitive and physical function is not fully understood.
Objective: We aim to compare the predictive capacities of 3 distinct aging metrics-motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), physio-cognitive decline syndrome (PCDS), and cognitive frailty (CF)-for incident dementia and all-cause mortality among community-dwelling older adults.
Methods: We used longitudinal data from waves 10-15 of the Health and Retirement Study. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was employed to evaluate the effects of MCR, PCDS, and CF on incident all-cause dementia and mortality, controlling for socioeconomic and lifestyle factors, as well as medical comorbidities. Discrimination analysis was conducted to assess and compare the predictive accuracy of the 3 aging metrics.
Results: A total of 2367 older individuals aged 65 years and older, with no baseline prevalence of dementia or disability, were ultimately included. The prevalence rates of MCR, PCDS, and CF were 5.4%, 6.3%, and 1.3%, respectively. Over a decade-long follow-up period, 341 cases of dementia and 573 deaths were recorded. All 3 metrics were predictive of incident all-cause dementia and mortality when adjusting for multiple confounders, with variations in the strength of their associations (incident dementia: MCR odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.30-2.78; CF 5.06, 95% CI 2.87-8.92; PCDS 3.35, 95% CI 2.44-4.58; mortality: MCR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17-2.19; CF 3.26, 95% CI 1.99-5.33; and PCDS 1.58, 95% CI 1.17-2.13). The C-index indicated that PCDS and MCR had the highest discriminatory accuracy for all-cause dementia and mortality, respectively.
Conclusions: Despite the inherent differences among the aging metrics that integrate cognitive and physical functions, they consistently identified risks of dementia and mortality. This underscores the importance of implementing targeted preventive strategies and intervention programs based on these metrics to enhance the overall quality of life and reduce premature deaths in aging populations.
背景:纳入认知和身体功能的衰老指标的效用尚未完全了解。目的:我们的目的是比较3种不同的衰老指标——运动认知风险综合征(MCR)、生理认知衰退综合征(PCDS)和认知衰弱(CF)——对社区居住老年人痴呆和全因死亡率的预测能力。方法:我们使用健康与退休研究第10-15波的纵向数据。采用Cox比例风险回归分析,在控制社会经济和生活方式因素以及医疗合并症的情况下,评估MCR、PCDS和CF对发病率和死亡率的影响。采用判别分析对3种衰老指标的预测准确性进行评价和比较。结果:最终纳入了2367名65岁及以上的老年人,他们没有痴呆或残疾的基线患病率。MCR、PCDS和CF患病率分别为5.4%、6.3%和1.3%。在长达十年的随访期间,记录了341例痴呆病例和573例死亡。在对多个混杂因素进行校正后,所有3个指标均可预测全因痴呆的发生率和死亡率,但它们的关联强度存在差异(痴呆的发生率:MCR优势比[OR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.30-2.78;Cf 5.06, 95% ci 2.87-8.92;PCDS 3.35, 95% ci 2.44-4.58;死亡率:MCR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17-2.19;Cf 3.26, 95% ci 1.99-5.33;PCDS 1.58, 95% CI 1.17-2.13)。c指数表明,PCDS和MCR分别对全因痴呆和死亡率具有最高的区分准确性。结论:尽管整合认知和身体功能的衰老指标存在固有差异,但它们一致地识别出痴呆和死亡的风险。这强调了在这些指标的基础上实施有针对性的预防战略和干预方案的重要性,以提高总体生活质量并减少老龄人口的过早死亡。