{"title":"The technology acceptance model and adopter type analysis in the context of artificial intelligence.","authors":"Fabio Ibrahim, Johann-Christoph Münscher, Monika Daseking, Nils-Torge Telle","doi":"10.3389/frai.2024.1496518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a transformative technology impacting various sectors of society and the economy. Understanding the factors influencing AI adoption is critical for both research and practice. This study focuses on two key objectives: (1) validating an extended version of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in the context of AI by integrating the Big Five personality traits and AI mindset, and (2) conducting an exploratory k-prototype analysis to classify AI adopters based on demographics, AI-related attitudes, and usage patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of <i>N</i> = 1,007 individuals individuals (60% female; <i>M</i> = 30.92; SD = 8.63 years) was collected. Psychometric data were obtained using validated scales for TAM constructs, Big Five personality traits, and AI mindset. Regression analysis was used to validate TAM, and a k-prototype clustering algorithm was applied to classify participants into adopter categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The psychometric analysis confirmed the validity of the extended TAM. Perceived usefulness was the strongest predictor of attitudes towards AI usage (<i>β</i> = 0.34, <i>p</i> < 0.001), followed by AI mindset scale growth (<i>β</i> = 0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, openness was positively associated with perceived ease of use (<i>β</i> = 0.15, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The k-prototype analysis revealed four distinct adopter clusters, consistent with the diffusion of innovations model: early adopters (<i>n</i> = 218), early majority (<i>n</i> = 331), late majority (<i>n</i> = 293), and laggards (<i>n</i> = 165).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of perceived usefulness and AI mindset in shaping attitudes toward AI adoption. The clustering results provide a nuanced understanding of AI adopter types, aligning with established innovation diffusion theories. Implications for AI deployment strategies, policy-making, and future research directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 ","pages":"1496518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1496518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a transformative technology impacting various sectors of society and the economy. Understanding the factors influencing AI adoption is critical for both research and practice. This study focuses on two key objectives: (1) validating an extended version of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in the context of AI by integrating the Big Five personality traits and AI mindset, and (2) conducting an exploratory k-prototype analysis to classify AI adopters based on demographics, AI-related attitudes, and usage patterns.
Methods: A sample of N = 1,007 individuals individuals (60% female; M = 30.92; SD = 8.63 years) was collected. Psychometric data were obtained using validated scales for TAM constructs, Big Five personality traits, and AI mindset. Regression analysis was used to validate TAM, and a k-prototype clustering algorithm was applied to classify participants into adopter categories.
Results: The psychometric analysis confirmed the validity of the extended TAM. Perceived usefulness was the strongest predictor of attitudes towards AI usage (β = 0.34, p < 0.001), followed by AI mindset scale growth (β = 0.28, p < 0.001). Additionally, openness was positively associated with perceived ease of use (β = 0.15, p < 0.001). The k-prototype analysis revealed four distinct adopter clusters, consistent with the diffusion of innovations model: early adopters (n = 218), early majority (n = 331), late majority (n = 293), and laggards (n = 165).
Discussion: The findings highlight the importance of perceived usefulness and AI mindset in shaping attitudes toward AI adoption. The clustering results provide a nuanced understanding of AI adopter types, aligning with established innovation diffusion theories. Implications for AI deployment strategies, policy-making, and future research directions are discussed.