Psychosocial Determinants and Outcomes of Expedited Liver Transplant Evaluations: Insights From a Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001745
Katherine M Cooper, Padmavathi Srivoleti, Alessandro Colletta, Doris Tripp, Savant Mehta, Babak Movahedi, Deepika Devuni
{"title":"Psychosocial Determinants and Outcomes of Expedited Liver Transplant Evaluations: Insights From a Retrospective Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Katherine M Cooper, Padmavathi Srivoleti, Alessandro Colletta, Doris Tripp, Savant Mehta, Babak Movahedi, Deepika Devuni","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the burden of chronic liver disease and the demand for liver transplants (LT) grows, understanding the interplay between access to care and patient outcomes is increasingly important. In this study, we explored patient characteristics and transplant outcomes in patients undergoing LT evaluations, with a focus on identifying risk factors for expedited LT evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent LT evaluation for deceased donor LT between October 2017 and July 2021. Patients were categorized by context: expedited (inpatient) and routine (outpatient) LT evaluation groups. The outcome measures included waitlist status, pre-LT mortality, and post-LT complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 602 patients, 26% underwent expedited LT evaluation. Patients who underwent expedited evaluation were more likely to have a history of ascites (<i>P</i> < 0.001), hepatic encephalopathy (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and had a higher model for end-stage liver disease sodium scores (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Both mortality (35% versus 17%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and LT (39% versus 22%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were more common in the expedited group; post-LT mortality was similar up to 2 y. Perceived financial concerns and social security disability income were risk factors for expedited LT evaluation. In addition, greater proximity to the LT center (95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.3; <i>P</i> = 0.025) and speaking a primary language other than English (95% confidence interval, 1.0-10.7; <i>P</i> = 0.042) were risk factors for expedited LT evaluation in women but not in men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expedited LT evaluations were associated with more severe illness and higher pre-LT mortality; however, post-LT outcomes were comparable with those of routine evaluations. Identifying psychosocial risk factors may enhance equity and access to LT evaluations, particularly for women who face unique challenges in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 2","pages":"e1745"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the burden of chronic liver disease and the demand for liver transplants (LT) grows, understanding the interplay between access to care and patient outcomes is increasingly important. In this study, we explored patient characteristics and transplant outcomes in patients undergoing LT evaluations, with a focus on identifying risk factors for expedited LT evaluation.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent LT evaluation for deceased donor LT between October 2017 and July 2021. Patients were categorized by context: expedited (inpatient) and routine (outpatient) LT evaluation groups. The outcome measures included waitlist status, pre-LT mortality, and post-LT complications.

Results: Of 602 patients, 26% underwent expedited LT evaluation. Patients who underwent expedited evaluation were more likely to have a history of ascites (P < 0.001), hepatic encephalopathy (P < 0.001), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (P < 0.001) and had a higher model for end-stage liver disease sodium scores (P < 0.001). Both mortality (35% versus 17%, P < 0.001) and LT (39% versus 22%, P < 0.001) were more common in the expedited group; post-LT mortality was similar up to 2 y. Perceived financial concerns and social security disability income were risk factors for expedited LT evaluation. In addition, greater proximity to the LT center (95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.3; P = 0.025) and speaking a primary language other than English (95% confidence interval, 1.0-10.7; P = 0.042) were risk factors for expedited LT evaluation in women but not in men.

Conclusions: Expedited LT evaluations were associated with more severe illness and higher pre-LT mortality; however, post-LT outcomes were comparable with those of routine evaluations. Identifying psychosocial risk factors may enhance equity and access to LT evaluations, particularly for women who face unique challenges in this context.

加速肝移植评估的社会心理决定因素和结果:来自回顾性队列分析的见解。
背景:随着慢性肝病的负担和肝移植需求的增长,了解获得护理与患者预后之间的相互作用变得越来越重要。在这项研究中,我们探讨了接受肝移植评估的患者的特征和移植结果,重点是确定快速肝移植评估的危险因素。方法:这项单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2017年10月至2021年7月期间因已故供体肝移植接受肝移植评估的患者。患者按环境分类:快速(住院)和常规(门诊)LT评估组。结果测量包括候补名单状态、肝移植前死亡率和肝移植后并发症。结果:602例患者中,26%接受了快速LT评估。接受快速评估的患者更有可能有腹水病史(P P P P P P P P = 0.025),并且主要语言不是英语(95%可信区间,1.0-10.7;P = 0.042)是女性加速LT评估的危险因素,而不是男性。结论:加速的肝移植评估与更严重的疾病和更高的肝移植前死亡率相关;然而,肝移植后的结果与常规评估相当。确定社会心理风险因素可能会提高公平和获得LT评估的机会,特别是对于在这种情况下面临独特挑战的妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信