Isabella Pickering, Mikaela Law, Stefan Calder, Greg O'Grady, Elizabeth Broadbent
{"title":"Perspectives of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for functional dyspepsia: qualitative interviews using thematic analysis.","authors":"Isabella Pickering, Mikaela Law, Stefan Calder, Greg O'Grady, Elizabeth Broadbent","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2025.2459269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has shown efficacy in improving mental health and symptoms of functional dyspepsia (FD), a prevalent disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). However, FD-specific CBT is not widely available or scalable. Therefore, this study explored the perspectives of patients with FD and clinicians who treat them on the use of digital CBT-based interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 21 patients with FD and 10 clinicians. Iterative, inductive thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three patient themes were developed: (1) their experiences contributing to coping difficulties, emphasising the complexity of self-management; (2) a desire for more personalised options, highlighting the need for accessible, FD-tailored CBT; and (3) concerns regarding human contact, safety, usability, and data security. Four clinician themes were also developed: (1) digital CBT bridges a gap in psychological support within gastroenterology; (2) perceived clinical utility of CBT; (3) digital CBT allows patient self-management; and (4) clinical concerns, including symptom tracking and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both patients and clinicians recognised the value and utility of digital CBT for FD. Tailored, digital CBT could inform and improve current management, making FD-specific psychological support more accessible.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2025.2459269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has shown efficacy in improving mental health and symptoms of functional dyspepsia (FD), a prevalent disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). However, FD-specific CBT is not widely available or scalable. Therefore, this study explored the perspectives of patients with FD and clinicians who treat them on the use of digital CBT-based interventions.
Methods and measures: This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 21 patients with FD and 10 clinicians. Iterative, inductive thematic analysis was conducted.
Results: Three patient themes were developed: (1) their experiences contributing to coping difficulties, emphasising the complexity of self-management; (2) a desire for more personalised options, highlighting the need for accessible, FD-tailored CBT; and (3) concerns regarding human contact, safety, usability, and data security. Four clinician themes were also developed: (1) digital CBT bridges a gap in psychological support within gastroenterology; (2) perceived clinical utility of CBT; (3) digital CBT allows patient self-management; and (4) clinical concerns, including symptom tracking and patient safety.
Conclusion: Both patients and clinicians recognised the value and utility of digital CBT for FD. Tailored, digital CBT could inform and improve current management, making FD-specific psychological support more accessible.
期刊介绍:
Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.