Use of a Continuum-Based Framework to Advance General Health Integration in Community Behavioral Health Clinics.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Psychiatric services Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20240019
Ekaterina Smali, Molly T Finnerty, Harold A Pincus, Rachel Talley, Matthew L Goldman, David Woodlock, Henry Chung
{"title":"Use of a Continuum-Based Framework to Advance General Health Integration in Community Behavioral Health Clinics.","authors":"Ekaterina Smali, Molly T Finnerty, Harold A Pincus, Rachel Talley, Matthew L Goldman, David Woodlock, Henry Chung","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the utility and effectiveness of the new general health integration (GHI) framework among community behavioral health organizations designated as certified community behavioral health clinics (CCBHCs) or in the process of applying to become a CCBHC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen licensed community behavioral health clinics, 18 of which had CCBHC status, participated in a 12-month learning collaborative. They used the GHI framework to assess their integration stage for 15 subdomains within eight domains of evidence-based practice. The clinics worked to improve their GHI practices with the support of monthly learning collaborative webinars, individual consultation calls, and technical assistance sessions. Clinics reported on performance quality metrics aligned with national CCBHC standards. Outcome measures included GHI framework scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up, capacity to report quality metrics at baseline and at the end of the collaborative, and average performance on the quality metrics at baseline versus at the end of the collaborative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinics showed overall improvement in integration stage over the study period. Of note, higher baseline GHI framework scores demonstrated a significant association with greater-quality performance at baseline (r=0.577, p=0.024) and follow-up (r=0.782, p=0.001). Capacity to track and report quality metrics increased significantly during the learning collaborative, as did average performance on quality metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community behavioral health clinics using the GHI framework were able to advance their GHI practices with a 12-month learning collaborative project. The framework has the potential to serve as a useful tool for clinics aiming to enhance GHI practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"366-372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed the utility and effectiveness of the new general health integration (GHI) framework among community behavioral health organizations designated as certified community behavioral health clinics (CCBHCs) or in the process of applying to become a CCBHC.

Methods: Nineteen licensed community behavioral health clinics, 18 of which had CCBHC status, participated in a 12-month learning collaborative. They used the GHI framework to assess their integration stage for 15 subdomains within eight domains of evidence-based practice. The clinics worked to improve their GHI practices with the support of monthly learning collaborative webinars, individual consultation calls, and technical assistance sessions. Clinics reported on performance quality metrics aligned with national CCBHC standards. Outcome measures included GHI framework scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up, capacity to report quality metrics at baseline and at the end of the collaborative, and average performance on the quality metrics at baseline versus at the end of the collaborative.

Results: Clinics showed overall improvement in integration stage over the study period. Of note, higher baseline GHI framework scores demonstrated a significant association with greater-quality performance at baseline (r=0.577, p=0.024) and follow-up (r=0.782, p=0.001). Capacity to track and report quality metrics increased significantly during the learning collaborative, as did average performance on quality metrics.

Conclusions: Community behavioral health clinics using the GHI framework were able to advance their GHI practices with a 12-month learning collaborative project. The framework has the potential to serve as a useful tool for clinics aiming to enhance GHI practices.

使用基于连续体的框架来促进社区行为健康诊所的一般健康整合。
目的:本研究评估新一般健康整合(GHI)框架在被指定为认证社区行为健康诊所(CCBHCs)或正在申请成为社区行为健康诊所(CCBHCs)的社区行为健康组织中的效用和有效性。方法:19家有执照的社区行为健康诊所(其中18家为CCBHC)参与了为期12个月的学习合作。他们使用GHI框架评估了8个循证实践领域中的15个子领域的整合阶段。这些诊所通过每月的学习合作网络研讨会、个人咨询电话和技术援助会议,努力改进其GHI实践。诊所报告了符合国家CCBHC标准的绩效质量指标。结果测量包括基线和1年随访时的GHI框架得分,在基线和合作结束时报告质量指标的能力,以及基线和合作结束时质量指标的平均表现。结果:临床综合阶段在研究期间整体改善。值得注意的是,较高的基线GHI框架得分与基线时(r=0.577, p=0.024)和随访时(r=0.782, p=0.001)的高质量表现显著相关。在学习协作过程中,跟踪和报告质量度量标准的能力显著提高,质量度量标准的平均性能也是如此。结论:使用GHI框架的社区行为健康诊所能够通过为期12个月的学习合作项目推进其GHI实践。该框架有可能成为旨在加强全球健康倡议实践的诊所的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信