Electroacupuncture for the treatment of ischemic stroke: A preclinical meta-analysis and systematic review.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Neural Regeneration Research Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-01030
Guohui Yang, Chong Guan, Meixi Liu, Yi Lin, Ying Xing, Yashuo Feng, Haozheng Li, Yi Wu, Nianhong Wang, Lu Luo
{"title":"Electroacupuncture for the treatment of ischemic stroke: A preclinical meta-analysis and systematic review.","authors":"Guohui Yang, Chong Guan, Meixi Liu, Yi Lin, Ying Xing, Yashuo Feng, Haozheng Li, Yi Wu, Nianhong Wang, Lu Luo","doi":"10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-01030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, and electroacupuncture has a long history of use in stroke treatment. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of electroacupuncture and explore its potential mechanisms in animal models of ischemic stroke. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were comprehensively searched up to May 1, 2024. This review included articles on preclinical investigations of the efficacy and mechanisms of electroacupuncture in treating ischemic stroke. Data from 70 eligible studies were analyzed in Stata 18.0, using a random-effects model to calculate the standardized mean difference (Hedge's g). The risk of bias was assessed using RevMan 5.4 software, and the quality of evidence was rated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Subgroup analyses were conducted to test the consistency of the results and sensitivity analyses were used to assess their robustness. The quality assessment revealed that most studies adequately handled incomplete data and selective reporting. However, several methodological limitations were identified: only 4 studies demonstrated a low risk of allocation concealment, 26 achieved a low risk of outcome assessment bias, and 9 had a high risk of randomization bias. Additionally, there was an unclear risk regarding participant blinding and other methodological aspects. The GRADE assessment rated 12 outcomes as moderate quality and 6 as low quality. The mechanisms of electroacupuncture treatment for ischemic stroke can be categorized as five primary pathways: (1) Electroacupuncture significantly reduced infarct volume and apoptotic cell death ( P < 0.01) in ischemic stroke models; (2) electroacupuncture significantly decreased the levels of pro-inflammatory factors ( P < 0.01) while increasing the levels of anti-inflammatory factors ( P = 0.02); (3) electroacupuncture reduced the levels of oxidative stress indicators ( P < 0.01) and enhanced the expression of antioxidant enzymes ( P < 0.01); (4) electroacupuncture significantly promoted nerve regeneration ( P < 0.01); and (5) electroacupuncture influenced blood flow remodeling ( P < 0.01) and angiogenesis ( P < 0.01). Subgroup analyses indicated that electroacupuncture was most effective in the transient middle cerebral artery occlusion model ( P < 0.01) and in post-middle cerebral artery occlusion intervention ( P < 0.01). Dispersive waves were found to outperform continuous waves with respect to neuroprotection and anti-inflammatory effects ( P < 0.01), while scalp acupoints demonstrated greater efficacy than body acupoints ( P < 0.01). The heterogeneity among the included studies was minimal, and sensitivity analyses indicated stable results. Their methodological quality was generally satisfactory. In conclusion, electroacupuncture is effective in treating cerebral ischemia by modulating cell apoptosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, stroke-induced nerve regeneration, blood flow remodeling, and angiogenesis. The efficacy of electroacupuncture may be influenced by factors such as the middle cerebral artery occlusion model, the timing of intervention onset, waveform, and acupoint selection. Despite the moderate to low quality of evidence, these findings suggest that electroacupuncture has clinical potential for improving outcomes in ischemic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":19113,"journal":{"name":"Neural Regeneration Research","volume":" ","pages":"1191-1210"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Regeneration Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-01030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, and electroacupuncture has a long history of use in stroke treatment. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of electroacupuncture and explore its potential mechanisms in animal models of ischemic stroke. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were comprehensively searched up to May 1, 2024. This review included articles on preclinical investigations of the efficacy and mechanisms of electroacupuncture in treating ischemic stroke. Data from 70 eligible studies were analyzed in Stata 18.0, using a random-effects model to calculate the standardized mean difference (Hedge's g). The risk of bias was assessed using RevMan 5.4 software, and the quality of evidence was rated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Subgroup analyses were conducted to test the consistency of the results and sensitivity analyses were used to assess their robustness. The quality assessment revealed that most studies adequately handled incomplete data and selective reporting. However, several methodological limitations were identified: only 4 studies demonstrated a low risk of allocation concealment, 26 achieved a low risk of outcome assessment bias, and 9 had a high risk of randomization bias. Additionally, there was an unclear risk regarding participant blinding and other methodological aspects. The GRADE assessment rated 12 outcomes as moderate quality and 6 as low quality. The mechanisms of electroacupuncture treatment for ischemic stroke can be categorized as five primary pathways: (1) Electroacupuncture significantly reduced infarct volume and apoptotic cell death ( P < 0.01) in ischemic stroke models; (2) electroacupuncture significantly decreased the levels of pro-inflammatory factors ( P < 0.01) while increasing the levels of anti-inflammatory factors ( P = 0.02); (3) electroacupuncture reduced the levels of oxidative stress indicators ( P < 0.01) and enhanced the expression of antioxidant enzymes ( P < 0.01); (4) electroacupuncture significantly promoted nerve regeneration ( P < 0.01); and (5) electroacupuncture influenced blood flow remodeling ( P < 0.01) and angiogenesis ( P < 0.01). Subgroup analyses indicated that electroacupuncture was most effective in the transient middle cerebral artery occlusion model ( P < 0.01) and in post-middle cerebral artery occlusion intervention ( P < 0.01). Dispersive waves were found to outperform continuous waves with respect to neuroprotection and anti-inflammatory effects ( P < 0.01), while scalp acupoints demonstrated greater efficacy than body acupoints ( P < 0.01). The heterogeneity among the included studies was minimal, and sensitivity analyses indicated stable results. Their methodological quality was generally satisfactory. In conclusion, electroacupuncture is effective in treating cerebral ischemia by modulating cell apoptosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, stroke-induced nerve regeneration, blood flow remodeling, and angiogenesis. The efficacy of electroacupuncture may be influenced by factors such as the middle cerebral artery occlusion model, the timing of intervention onset, waveform, and acupoint selection. Despite the moderate to low quality of evidence, these findings suggest that electroacupuncture has clinical potential for improving outcomes in ischemic stroke.

电针治疗缺血性脑卒中:临床前荟萃分析和系统评价。
脑卒中仍然是世界范围内导致死亡和残疾的主要原因,电针在脑卒中治疗中有着悠久的使用历史。本荟萃分析和系统综述旨在评价电针在缺血性脑卒中动物模型中的疗效并探讨其潜在机制。PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、CENTRAL和CINAHL数据库被全面检索至2024年5月1日。本文综述了电针治疗缺血性脑卒中的疗效和机制的临床前研究。在Stata 18.0中分析70项符合条件的研究的数据,使用随机效应模型计算标准化平均差(Hedge’s g)。使用RevMan 5.4软件评估偏倚风险,并根据推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)系统对证据质量进行评分。采用亚组分析检验结果的一致性,并采用敏感性分析评估其稳健性。质量评估显示,大多数研究充分处理了不完整的数据和选择性报告。然而,我们发现了一些方法学上的局限性:只有4项研究显示了低风险的分配隐藏,26项研究实现了低风险的结果评估偏倚,9项研究具有高风险的随机化偏倚。此外,在参与者盲法和其他方法学方面存在不明确的风险。GRADE评估将12个结果评为中等质量,6个为低质量。电针治疗缺血性脑卒中的机制可分为5个主要途径:(1)电针可显著降低缺血性脑卒中模型的梗死面积和凋亡细胞死亡(P < 0.01);(2)电针能显著降低促炎因子水平(P < 0.01),提高抗炎因子水平(P = 0.02);(3)电针可降低氧化应激指标水平(P < 0.01),提高抗氧化酶表达(P < 0.01);(4)电针显著促进神经再生(P < 0.01);(5)电针对血流重构(P < 0.01)和血管生成(P < 0.01)有影响。亚组分析结果显示,电针治疗在短暂性大脑中动脉闭塞模型(P < 0.01)和大脑中动脉闭塞后干预(P < 0.01)中最有效。在神经保护和抗炎作用方面,散波优于连续波(P < 0.01),头皮穴位优于身体穴位(P < 0.01)。纳入研究的异质性很小,敏感性分析显示结果稳定。他们的方法质量总体上令人满意。综上所述,电针通过调节细胞凋亡、氧化应激、炎症、脑卒中诱导的神经再生、血流重塑和血管生成,有效治疗脑缺血。电针治疗的疗效可能受到大脑中动脉闭塞模型、干预时间、波形、穴位选择等因素的影响。尽管证据质量中等到较低,但这些发现表明电针具有改善缺血性卒中预后的临床潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neural Regeneration Research
Neural Regeneration Research CELL BIOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
515
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Neural Regeneration Research (NRR) is the Open Access journal specializing in neural regeneration and indexed by SCI-E and PubMed. The journal is committed to publishing articles on basic pathobiology of injury, repair and protection to the nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving traumatically injuried patients and patients with neurodegenerative diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信