Analysis of comprehensive genomic profiling of solid tumors with a novel assay for broad analysis in clinical diagnostics.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Molecular Oncology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1002/1878-0261.13812
Guy Froyen, Pieter-Jan Volders, Ellen Geerdens, Severine Berden, Joni Van der Meulen, Aaron De Cock, Stefanie Vermeire, Jacques Van Huysse, Marie de Barsy, Gabriela Beniuga, Wendy W J de Leng, Anne M L Jansen, Imke Demers, Zeliha Ozgur, Hendrikus Jan Dubbink, Ernst-Jan M Speel, Wilfred F J van IJcken, Brigitte Maes
{"title":"Analysis of comprehensive genomic profiling of solid tumors with a novel assay for broad analysis in clinical diagnostics.","authors":"Guy Froyen, Pieter-Jan Volders, Ellen Geerdens, Severine Berden, Joni Van der Meulen, Aaron De Cock, Stefanie Vermeire, Jacques Van Huysse, Marie de Barsy, Gabriela Beniuga, Wendy W J de Leng, Anne M L Jansen, Imke Demers, Zeliha Ozgur, Hendrikus Jan Dubbink, Ernst-Jan M Speel, Wilfred F J van IJcken, Brigitte Maes","doi":"10.1002/1878-0261.13812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Somatic multigene analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is routinely integrated in medical oncology for clinical decision-making. However, with the fast-growing number of recommended and required genes as well as pan-cancer biomarkers, small panels have become vastly insufficient. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is, thus, required to screen for clinically relevant markers. In this multicentric study, we report on an extensive analysis across seven centers comparing the results of the novel OncoDEEP CGP assay with the diagnostically validated TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500) kit on 250 samples. Overall concordance was 90% for clinically relevant gene variants and >96% for more complex biomarkers. Agreement for fusion detection was 94% for the 11 overlapping clinically actionable driver genes. The higher coverage uniformity of OncoDEEP compared to TSO500 allows users to pool more samples per sequencing run. Tertiary data analysis, including reporting, is integrated in the OncoDEEP solution, whereas this is an add-on for TSO500. Finally, we showed that, analytically, the OncoDEEP panel performs well, thereby advocating its use for CGP of solid tumors in diagnostic laboratories, providing an all-in-one solution for optimal patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":18764,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1797-1810"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Somatic multigene analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is routinely integrated in medical oncology for clinical decision-making. However, with the fast-growing number of recommended and required genes as well as pan-cancer biomarkers, small panels have become vastly insufficient. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is, thus, required to screen for clinically relevant markers. In this multicentric study, we report on an extensive analysis across seven centers comparing the results of the novel OncoDEEP CGP assay with the diagnostically validated TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500) kit on 250 samples. Overall concordance was 90% for clinically relevant gene variants and >96% for more complex biomarkers. Agreement for fusion detection was 94% for the 11 overlapping clinically actionable driver genes. The higher coverage uniformity of OncoDEEP compared to TSO500 allows users to pool more samples per sequencing run. Tertiary data analysis, including reporting, is integrated in the OncoDEEP solution, whereas this is an add-on for TSO500. Finally, we showed that, analytically, the OncoDEEP panel performs well, thereby advocating its use for CGP of solid tumors in diagnostic laboratories, providing an all-in-one solution for optimal patient management.

实体肿瘤的综合基因组谱分析与临床诊断广泛分析的新分析。
通过下一代测序(NGS)进行体细胞多基因分析是医学肿瘤学临床决策的常规集成。然而,随着推荐和需要的基因以及泛癌症生物标志物数量的快速增长,小型小组已经变得非常不足。因此,需要综合基因组谱(CGP)来筛选临床相关的标记物。在这项多中心研究中,我们报告了一项跨7个中心的广泛分析,将新型OncoDEEP CGP检测结果与经过诊断验证的TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500)试剂盒在250个样本上的结果进行了比较。临床相关基因变异的总体一致性为90%,更复杂的生物标志物的总体一致性为96%。对于11个重叠的临床可操作驱动基因,融合检测的一致性为94%。与TSO500相比,OncoDEEP的覆盖均匀性更高,允许用户每次测序运行时汇集更多样本。三级数据分析(包括报告)集成在OncoDEEP解决方案中,而这是TSO500的附加组件。最后,我们分析表明,OncoDEEP面板表现良好,因此提倡在诊断实验室中使用实体肿瘤的CGP,为最佳患者管理提供一体化解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Oncology
Molecular Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
203
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Oncology highlights new discoveries, approaches, and technical developments, in basic, clinical and discovery-driven translational cancer research. It publishes research articles, reviews (by invitation only), and timely science policy articles. The journal is now fully Open Access with all articles published over the past 10 years freely available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信